Assertions about Stefanoni from posters instead may well be based on nothing. There isn't a denial from a direct source. There is no document reporting an alleged false statement by Stefanoni, there is no official source about any alleged Stefanoni's lie or improper conduct. There is no document about any defence request, which would be the equivalent of an official denial.
Nice, but irrelevant. We aren't talking about 'official documents' - indeed, if the allegations were true, there would be no 'official documents' as the supression of such documents is part of the allegations.
It's almost as if you don't actually understand what is being alleged.
What expressed about Stefanoni in this thread is not criticism.
Criticism is an opinion expressed upon facts.
These are false allegations. They are unfounded and obviously false statements, which just allege events and facts that did not take place.
Then point to the official documents of the process that proved that these are false statements.
You can't, obviously, as they've yet to be tested 'officially'. But the most important point that you're missing is that you cannot deny them using the same criteria that you are requesting be used to substantiate them.
Under your own parameters of what you will and will not accept, you cannot deny the allegations or make any statement calling them false.
You've essentially argued that your own opinion has no validity. You've trapped yourself in your own pedantry.
This is otherwise known as 'cutting off your nose to spite your face' , or 'shooting yourself in the foot'.
As you have no official documents that you can use to deny the allegations, I expect you will stop denying the allegations.
You won't, of course, you'll find some slimy way to say that you actually meant something else (that you just happened to have made up just now) and that it was what you always meant from the beginning - just like you always do.
What a waste of time.
