You-Tube: FBI Attempts Cover Up for TWA Flight 800
No. You made the claim, you provide the evidence. And no just silly CT videos.
Chris Emery has a good grasp of this. He says 23 naval vessels participated in the exercise.
I'm sure we all share an interest in Navy coming forth with the relief of duty information according to the great sunshine democracy we live in.
Given that a sizable percentage of people here aren't USAian, no.
Now we're up to 23 naval vessels? Wouldn't that represent a significant fraction of the Navy's assets along the US East Coast?
ETA: In 1996 the Navy had 375 total active ships. So this would mean over 5% of the Navy's worldwide fleet strength involved in this one exercise. That's some exercise.
And there's have been a huge paper trail. Which the CT'ers have singularly failed to show.
I think you're bluffing and if we did a test of a US drone missile passing through a 747 we would find PETN residue sprayed on the seats in an identical pattern with a reddish purple stain.
No you wouldn't. For the numerous reasons already given.
The official explanation is nonsense.
No, it fits the facts, far better than the nonsensical ramblings of the nutters.
The surface temperature was 71 degrees that evening off Long Island. Subtract 3 degrees for every 1000 feet of altitude and the outside temperature was right around 32 degrees when Flight 800 reached 13,000 feet with a wind chill of nearly 400mph on the fuselage. There's no way you could spark a fuel tank explosion in those conditions with the scenario the official investigation described.
Wrong.
Still waiting to hear the Long Island Coroner's exact words or read his report, and to discover the identity of this all-important submarine captain who was relieved of duty.
Don't hold your breath.
You wrote a lot but you never really answered the unidirectional ejecta plume clearly caught on radar.
Answered several times, you just don't like the facts as they invalidate your fantasy.
Government screwed-up because 3 KH-11 satellites were in position to observe the crash.
Untrue. As you'd know if you back-tracked the orbits.
Interestingly, and as further evidence that the CT peddlers are not only liars but incompetent ones at that; the US NRO only had two KH-11's in orbit in July 1996, USA-86 and USA-116. USA-33 de-orbited earlier that year and NROL-2/USA-129 wasn't launched until December.
They said all three "failed". What are the odds of all three failing at the same time? They screwed-up because they admitted elsewhere that one of the satellites captured the naval ships in the area (which means they were working).
As I've pointed out, you are either lying yourself or parroting someone else's lies without bothering to check. Either way you're talking utter crap.
It is also rather amusing how even superficial research shows your claims to be rubbish.
: a form of light mental exercise to relax after work and before bed. Like deconstructing and episode of CSI and finding all the scientific errors.
