• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Markets, Trading & Charts Thread

incidentally, does anybody have any good links to Bitcoin charts?

interactive so I can drill in preferably? it will be interesting to see if the phenomena is evident in pretty much the only non-bank monopolized market out there wont it. I genuinely haven't looked yet.
 
The Central Scrutinizer said:
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool." - Richard P. Feynman
Click to expand...

does anybody else think this poster might actually be a spambot?

we have used text spinning software that makes more sense, and the mechanical post rate of 10 posts a day for 10 years plus of incomprehensible one line nonsense? :)

I would assign a reasonable probability to that and bet a 10% position size on it.
 
seriously, I would really like to leave this now, but it seems as if the market is allowing me to school you to a briefly perfect script, by doing what I am telling you, daily, the next day. cant help but chuckle. have you ever considered you might be facing the wrong way? :)

Apple Open - 3rd gap in a row in the direction I am expecting. 3/3. chance? really? :) yea ok. its not like its also present in Boeing first looked at this morning either is it?

please note once again the selling to Rubes (in the trading sense, no offence blah blah blah) at inflated spreads before pushing up, selling down hard and gapping down from there today.

so if you bought yesterdays dip (BTFD! BTFD!) they might even be straight past your stoploss now and into your unprotected account. THAT is what is going on, IMO.

1376055284-clip-40kb.png


edit, not third day in a row, third time in this cycle.

nope edit again, 4th time in a row, including at the top. anybody want to see close up or do you trust me that much yet? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
kevsta said:
JREF $1m demo account @ 200 leverage x exact same process & software = game over is how I see it. I think you are being unreasonable, but preconceptions do that.

and actually the demo/real distinction is ridiculous, because if you dont think the algorithms are proven on demo prior to, you are delusional. the difference is an account number through with which you log into the same platform.
Click to expand...
Now you are being *really* silly. If you don't know what the massive gulf is between paper trades and real (levered) money, then *please* stick with the paper ones.
 
Francesca R said:
Now you are being *really* silly. If you don't know what the massive gulf is between paper trades and real (levered) money, then *please* stick with the paper ones.
Click to expand...

please elaborate Francesca? a while back I asked for help on the theoretical mathematical leverage limits. <tumbleweed>

I am, as I have stated an 18 months in newb. however there is zero doubt in my mind I can see something significant here. I could be wrong, of course, however I have replicated it on small scale at 100% leverage live.

obviously however I have never hit the button on 200 currency contracts in a live scenario. apologies I had to start basically trolling with the facts to get attention, but this is a genuine request for independent and hopefully knowledgable or insightful thoughts or knowledge.

So, please, if you know, tell me, what is the difference ? If someone transfers $1m into alive account at 200 leverage, and I play the exact same games, what would happen? or not?

Im aware of slippage and spreads (lol, acutely aware), but that is entirely inconsequential if you are trading at up to 5 or 10: risk reward?

I have never said I am an expert, but I am certain I now have a better chance than the other 90%. once again, I dont know how else to say it.

<ResortTolaughingDog>
 
The Central Scrutinizer said:
I had a 267,000% return on my demo account last month.
Click to expand...

so presumably you can show us screenshots of the trades, and balances as I have?

o.n.g.o.i.n.g.f.o.r.m.o.n.t.h.s.a.n.d.g.e.t.t.i.n.g.s.h.a.r.p.e.r.e.v.e.r.y.d.a.y?

if only you would actually try it, don't you want me to have to send you a cheque for $50? what have you got to lose? :) metatrader 4, 20 trades, stll be positive, fifty bucks is yours. do it. go on.

i.t.s.d.e.f.i.n.i.t.e.l.y.a.s.p.a.m.b.o.t.o.f.o.n.e.s.o.r.t.o.r.a.n.o.t.h.e.r
 
Last edited:
So try walking along a narrow wall 0.25m off the ground. Then do the same thing along the top of a 50m high wall. Should be completely no different right?
 
Francesca R said:
So try walking along a narrow wall 0.25m off the ground. Then do the same thing along the top of a 50m high wall. Should be completely no different right?
Click to expand...

personally, yes of course. technically?

I never thought I'd have children, but have been presented with one anyway, so say he has an advanced learning capacity for games and I start drilling him on this from 3 years onwards, and say I am actually right about the probability of playing my game this way, and he overtakes me at 5, and is an emotionately dispassionate manipulation trading machine hitting the market turning points exactly as the algos do..

what stops him being a quasanti-quillionaire by the age of 14 and the threshold of entire world ownership being suddenly crossed around 2022? :)

technically? anything? we'll be on billion x leverage by then easily..

so, what (other than the fact none of it is actually real, obviously) are the limits? :D
 
Apple floor failing at 455.44 by looks of it currently. some of you guys could have lightened up when I announced it as an imminent short at the weekend. or you could always buy the dip now, it *could* bounce here..? (in reality, always, anyhting is always possible) :)

whether you take my advice or not, I would be pretty confident now that not a single one of you would want to take the opposite side of my trades for long with no stoplosses in place, or say I can even gap straight past it whenever I wanted, hows that sound? ;)
 
seriously, the combination of what Im doing here and CNBC is just the most surreal.

the analysts are just a tragic joke.
 
kevsta said:
whether you take my advice or not, I would be pretty confident now that not a single one of you would want to take the opposite side of my trades for long with no stoplosses in place, or say I can even gap straight past it whenever I wanted, hows that sound? ;)
Click to expand...

Sounds great!! Will that put you over $1 million? No? I didn't think so. But please, do write when it finally happens. If the forum still exists, that is. ;)
 
kevsta said:
seriously, the combination of what Im doing here and CNBC is just the most surreal.

the analysts are just a tragic joke.
Click to expand...


You ought to take up palm reading.

My guess is you'd be good at it.
 
AdMan said:
You ought to take up palm reading.

My guess is you'd be good at it.
Click to expand...

thank you. I'd prefer we address the subject than the person, but any input other than endless looped combinations of
"I have no clue about anything on the subject but I know you're wrong"
Click to expand...

is good at this stage. funnily enough, I end up quite good at whatever I focus on generally.

but I genuinely dont know what you mean.
 
kevsta said:
thank you. I'd prefer we address the subject than the person, but any input other than endless looped combinations of


is good at this stage. funnily enough, I end up quite good at whatever I focus on generally.

but I genuinely dont know what you mean.
Click to expand...


It requires a good imagination, and the ability to see patterns where none exist.
 
AdMan said:
It requires a good imagination, and the ability to see patterns where none exist.
Click to expand...

heh. ok thx for clarification, at least. so is the general concensus that there is no 3 wave pattern visible at all? is that really how it looks to you?

one should consider, that these charts have time along the X axis and can be drilled into in great depth. and interestingly enough the 3 wave cycles are visible (to me and many others) in every timescale you look at. in the same way the whole weekly cycle from Level 3 to Level 3 appears (to us) as 3 distinct thrusts, and (nearly) always breaks prior lows before going (one exception, the straighaway trade, search it in this thread)

so does each individual primary push consist of 3 waves at 15 minute chart level. and 10. and 5. and 1minute.

these lower levels are where retail traders tend to get run over by the juggernaut every time they press the button most often.

I can tell if I have cycle right by whether I merely get stopped out and it goes anyway, (execution trade fail) or the whole trend goes the other way again and again. (system trade fail) - that used to happen a lot, and hardly ever any more.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom