He didn't say he was looking for a sign, he said he was looking for an address.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=X_2NeMrGCvg#t=497s
There are addresses on every house. He didn't even need to get out of his truck.
How many times must we have this discussion. A street address is not useful without a street name.
YET AGAIN:
https://www.txantimedia.com/?p=1025
Singleton: Then does, do you say he ran?
Zimmerman: Yes.
Singleton: Then you get out of your car and run after him.
Zimmerman: I didn’t run after him, no. I walked to find the street name, or a street sign. And he had already run, cut out between the houses. So I knew that, if I walked straight through that little sidewalk, I knew that that was my street that I lived on.
He had more than sufficient time to have gotten over to the other street and read the address while the dispatcher was still on the phone. The claim that he was looking for an address is thus demonstraitably bogus.
I don't see how your simply claiming "he had sufficient time" demonstrates it was bogus.
Did he immediately walk over there ?
How fast did he walk ?
Did he stop while he was walking ?
Should I likewise assert that JRs claim that TM was walking back from 7/11 is demonstrably bogus, he had more than sufficient time to make it home form 7/11, yet never did ?
The cut-through is a wide open space. If George was there he would be able to see that there was no one in earshot to overhear him giving his address to the dispatcher if he talked softly. George therefore was in another place where someone could be hiding close by like walking south on RVC where there are parked cars.
George is walking south on RVC as evidenced by the wind.
So now the wind somehow lets you know where GZ is ?
Your assumptions are just that, assumptions. And not very good ones.
If GZ was able to see,
where was TM when GZ was initially walking down toward and past the TEE ?
How is it GZ walked by without seeing him ?
Trayvon saying "now he's behind me" Implying a switch in orientation.
Your assumption is just that, an assumption. And not even based on the actual dialogue RJ relayed:
BDLR: OK..um…and then what happened?
Dee Dee: And then he told me like the guy was getting close..like..and he told me the guy was
getting real close to him. The next I hear, “What are you following me for?
BTW, do you really think, months later, she remembered word-for-word what TM said ?
Her excuse of not telling crump everything is preposterous. "The wasn't the law, so I didn't have to tell them" is a bunch of crap. Then when she was supposed to tell the truth, she lied about things anyway.
Her credibility is completely suspect. Her statements are just as self-serving as GZ.
The location of Trayvon's phone and George's flashlight marking the start of the confrontation well south of the tee.
So, in your mind, GZ, criminal mastermind,
planted his small key and flashlight back at the TEE after he shot TM, so he could then lie about where the fight happened.
And all the witnesses who say the altercation started at the Tee, they are lying or mistaken ?
That makes no difference.
In your mind the fact that you had to change the dialogue to fit your version of events makes no difference ?
Trayvon cannot tell us who was calling for help. It's possible that they both were. George of course must say that he was the only one calling for help. Any sign that trayvon was seeking help wouldd break George's story.
Tracy Martin said it wasn't his son crying for help, then lied about it. Javharis Fulton said he didn't know who it was. John good said he thought it was GZ yelling.
Awfully lucky for GZ that no one else really seemed to think it was TM yelling.
And good thing TM didn't actually turn around and say anything to John Good like "he attacked me" or anything, so that didn't blow GZ secret plan.
The jury found that GZ shooting was justified. That means TM was at fault.
All I can say is WOW! Total logic fail on your part.
Please do not simply assert, explain. GZ shooting was justified, Because if it was not, he would have been found guilty. If ti was Justified, it was because he had to defend himself from TM. That means TM was at fault. Even juror B37 said:
"I believe he played a huge role in his death," she said about the teenager.