• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Chick Tracts

You think that's bad? Check out this play. (Warning, get the barf bags ready.)



That's just part 1. You can find the rest linked in the Related Videos. I had the displeasure of watching this garbage in a live performance 4 years ago. This was my reaction at the time.

Jesus didn't die for me or anyone else. I prefer to think that it was the life of Jesus, not his death, that happened for the sake of those who would follow his example, and you don't need to be a Christian to do so.
 
Last edited:
Wowbagger said:
The sequel is a LOT better:
Click to expand...
Agreed. I forgot to mention that, going into the play without any idea what it was, I assumed it was simply a gospel music performance. Now that, I would have enjoyed a hell of a lot more.

Incidentally, one of the related videos depicts the kind of Jesus I grew up with:

 
Latest tract here.

Kind of retro, both in art style and its straightforwardness; not too much hate in this one. It's more or less limited to the "sin" panel, where all the sinful people are Jews/Asians/Muslims/etc.

Lots of Fang, too, which is the reason I read them. In Panel 2, Fang seems to be taking a crap on the lawn, which I take to be his review of the banal dialog. Halfway down or so, he's barking up a tree at his old nemesis The Cat Whose Name I Don't Know. In the "wash away our sins" panel, he displays a heretofore undisclosed talent; the ability to sleep standing up. And three panels later, he has been mounted by the cat, who is clearly trying to rape him while he runs. (I hereby dub him Rapey Cat.) Oh, Fang, will you ever win?

I give the Fang story a 10/10; clearly the best one in years. The overall strip is a 2; a couple of points for glurgy stuff like "it made my hair fly away," but not enough to really get worked up about.
 
Last edited:
poblob14 said:
Latest tract here.

Kind of retro, both in art style and its straightforwardness; not too much hate in this one. It's more or less limited to the "sin" panel, where all the sinful people are Jews/Asians/Muslims/etc.

Lots of Fang, too, which is the reason I read them. In Panel 2, Fang seems to be taking a crap on the lawn, which I take to be his review of the banal dialog. Halfway down or so, he's barking up a tree at his old nemesis The Cat Whose Name I Don't Know. In the "wash away our sins" panel, he displays a heretofore undisclosed talent; the ability to sleep standing up. And three panels later, he has been mounted by the cat, who is clearly trying to rape him while he runs. (I hereby dub him Rapey Cat.) Oh, Fang, will you ever win?

I give the Fang story a 10/10; clearly the best one in years. The overall strip is a 2; a couple of points for glurgy stuff like "it made my hair fly away," but not enough to really get worked up about.
Click to expand...

Hilarious review. I completely missed all that stuff with Fang and TCWNIDK.
 
poblob14 said:
Latest tract here.

Kind of retro, both in art style and its straightforwardness; not too much hate in this one. It's more or less limited to the "sin" panel, where all the sinful people are Jews/Asians/Muslims/etc.
Click to expand...
There's one attractive-looking Jewish person in the story. So much so, indeed, that "the Holy Ghost came upon" her - Naughty Holy Ghost! "and put a baby inside her."
 
Last edited:
Paul2 said:
Hilarious review. I completely missed all that stuff with Fang and TCWNIDK.
Click to expand...

Same here but now I'm a Fang Fan. Will Fang make it to doggy heaven or will he be overcome by unnatural cat love?
 
I've said for years that if I could draw at all, I would make a Fang spinoff comic. The very first strip would have Fang biting Jack Chick himself in the balls, probably in retaliation for one of those strips where Fang just appears as a picture on the wall or something.
 
CORed said:
Well, that is, after all, the usual way of putting a baby inside a woman.
Click to expand...
As I said earlier in this thread when reacting to a similar frame of a different tract... "upon" instead of "into" really isn't the usual way, but it does seem to be what the illustration actually showed in that case.

Compare the old one to the new one:
attachment.php
1084_11.gif


The old one was removed from the tract in which it originally appeared and deleted from Chick's website, presumably because they noticed it was being viewed/downloaded more than the rest of the same tract's images and figured out why. The new one looks redesigned to avoid the messy comparison and sticky implication... but if you figure the direction of the light indicates the direction of the Holy Spirit, you could still say that the position she's in doesn't say "praying" so much as it says "Fang style"...
 
Last edited:
Delvo said:
As I said earlier in this thread when reacting to a similar frame of a different tract... "upon" instead of "into" really isn't the usual way, but it does seem to be what the illustration actually showed in that case.

Compare the old one to the new one:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=27396&stc=1&thumb=1&d=1357343457[/qimg][qimg]http://media.chick.com/tractimages67491/1084/1084_11.gif[/qimg]

The old one was removed from the tract in which it originally appeared and deleted from Chick's website, presumably because they noticed it was being viewed/downloaded more than the rest of the same tract's images and figured out why. The new one looks redesigned to avoid the messy comparison and sticky implication... but if you figure the direction of the light indicates the direction of the Holy Spirit, you could still say that the position she's in doesn't say "praying" so much as it says "Fang style"...
Click to expand...

Damn. Mary has a nice ass.
 
I bet Jack Chick has spawned more than one doctorate thesis in the psychiatric fields. It's a startlingly clear window into madness itself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom