That's one of the reason the comparative DNA test would be an interesting
thing to do. If I was able to prove that my dust samples contain the remains
of, say, half dozen 9/11 victims, then it would be hard to make any sort of
argument that the samples didn't come from the WTC.
Now, since many lines of evidence have convinced me, the principal
researcher on this project, that the dust is, in fact, WTC dust, this
whole line of experimentation is rather uninteresting, because it's not
a scientific breakthrough. It's a control experiment, intended only to
satisfy the masses.
Remember, I've convinced myself pretty well that it is WTC dust, even
though I might be mistaken and proved mistaken in the future.
Proving that my samples are WTC dust to the masses would be very
expensive to do it the way I envision it, resulting in OJ Simpson trial
type of proof. I don't have that kind of cash to throw away on a
control experiment, even though it could and probably should be done.
If I "prove" that the dust is from the WTC, big whup. That's step one.
It's not unique. Other people have WTC dust. Nobody has done my
material analysis of the dust, and nobody has come to what I think are
amazing conclusions, that the WTC was turned into metallic foam at
low temperature.
Oh, yeah. The DNA comparative test would prove that the samples were
never hot, because DNA degrades quickly at high temperatures.
So there is that additional reason to do the DNA work, but I still don't
have the money for that.
