RoboTimbo
Hostile Nanobacon
What is your evidence those civilizations survived the flood?
What an inane question. Did you not read what I wrote and you quoted?
What is your evidence those civilizations survived the flood?
What is your evidence those civilizations survived the flood?
What is your evidence those civilizations survived the flood?
...Here's a listing of cities that are older than this flood date
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_time_of_continuous_habitation
No signs of flooding here. ...
So what do you call the fallacy where your judgement of information is not based on the accuracy of the information presented but strictly on your opinion of the source where the information came from?
And in related news some scientists believe Jonah's and the whale's earliest ancestor was the same one celled creature, who ultimately caused Jonah and the whale by unintelligent forces.
So what do you call the fallacy where your judgement of information is not based on the accuracy of the information presented but strictly on your opinion of the source where the information came from?
Biblical literalism.
Are you saying that Pangea was still one land mass 6000 years ago? And everything moved to where it is since then?
It's a possibility since it would seem the entire earth being under water 150 days and "fountains of the deep" (mentioned in Genesis) shooting out water, could have loosened things up quite a bit for a subsequent sudden shift of land masses.
And in related news some scientists believe Jonah's and the whale's earliest ancestor was the same one celled creature, who ultimately caused Jonah and the whale by unintelligent forces.
Not really? Sounds like the Soviet and Chinese scientists who had to tailor their experiments and results to fit orthodox Marxism/Leninism.There is no fallacy involved in pointing out that a source that claims, evidently seriously, that "...E-MC2 is liberal claptrap..." is, at best, an untrustworthy source.
Very cool - thanks for posting this.Simple, Brother!
Jonah was eaten by a pakicetid.
It was either a giant pakicetid or Jonah was a very small man.
Praise the Lord, Brother, praise the Lord!
Pakicetids: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakicetid
Why aren't there any whale fossils in amongst the fish, squid and shrimp fossils in the mountains of Lebanon and Peru?
Not really? Sounds like the Soviet and Chinese scientists who had to tailor their experiments and results to fit orthodox Marxism/Leninism.
How can an equation be liberal or conservative? That's like saying that it's chocolate.
ETA: OMG, I just looked and it really does say exactly that. doc is keeping great company there.
...Here's a listing of cities that are older than this flood date
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_time_of_continuous_habitation...
Here is the second and third sentences of your link:
"The age claims listed are generally disputed and may indeed be obsolete. Differences in opinion can result from different definitions of "city" as well as "continuously inhabited" and historical evidence is often disputed."
____
Also there are differences of opinion between Christians as to the age of the flood. The bible has gaps in genealogy at other places in the bible so there could be gaps in the genealogical record before Noah. Because of those gaps some believe it could have been 10,000 years ago, and some believe much longer.
Mere quibbling.Here is the second and third sentences of your link:
"The age claims listed are generally disputed and may indeed be obsolete. Differences in opinion can result from different definitions of "city" as well as "continuously inhabited" and historical evidence is often disputed."
Well, naturally. When you make it up as you go along the dates will be "mushy" at best.____
Also there are differences of opinion between Christians as to the age of the flood. The bible has gaps in genealogy at other places in the bible so there could be gaps in the genealogical record before Noah. Because of those gaps some believe it could have been 10,000 years ago, and some believe much longer.
In the interest of balance of whackiness, feminist Luce Irigaray has suggested that E=MC2 is a "sexed equation."