You know of all the crap that site puts out the bottom summary is actually tolerable...outlandish as it is...but tolerable.
No, it's still intolerable, and just a stupid CT, because of this line:
In real police work, they’re called “evidence,” and the people in these photos should be persons of interest.
Infowhores isn't "Real police work" that defines who should be "persons of interest" for the actual investigation. The real police probably took one look at these photos and said, "Yeah, that's Bob. He's standing over there talking to the Chief, if you want to interview him".
It's a CT, because they assume there's no possible way these guys could legitimately have been hired to work security for the marathon, and that their presence is thus automatically suspicious. They conclude that the only reason the police aren't putting out bulletins indicating that they're looking for these guys is that there's a conspiracy to hide their presence at the event. They don't even consider the possibility that the people in charge already knew exactly who they were, why they were there, and what they were doing, and so didn't have any reason to be looking for them.
It's just one more example of one of the fundamental flaws with the CT mindset: the assumption that if the CTist doesn't know or understand something,
no one knows or understands it, and that this
automatically makes something "suspect", and that if you don't agree with this, it automatically makes
you suspect as well.
Couple that with their typical ridiculous analyses ("Gee, one black bag sort of looks similar to the
exploded remains of another!"), and you see why anything Infowhores says should be dismissed out of hand.
