Merged The Origin of Two Different Colors of WTC Dust

[Dash80]

And destroy the evidence!?

I suggest taking lot of photos. Then spam them around the net, claiming some kind of imaginary weapon caused your house to get dusty.

 

[tsig]

I suggest taking lot of photos. Then spam them around the net, claiming some kind of imaginary weapon caused your house to get dusty.

So it was micro engineered nano dust mites that did it. The MENDM's ate the steel and the foam is their excrement, the smell speaks for itself.

WTC Dust, check your sample for dead MENDM's quickly lest they reanimate and wreak gread havoc.

 

[leftysergeant]

Here is a zero magnification view and a 100X magnification view of some WTC dust.

The top one looks like an ordinary clinker out of a coal-fired furnace.

 

[WTC Dust]

It's 100ft across.

Dusty is such an amateur that she doesn't realise that the convention is to put a steel rule next the sample so the reader can gage size.

I'm not a photographer! I didn't take these images, and I didn't pay for these images to be taken. When you ask someone to take images as a favor, you sort of have to accept what you get.

It shows the point. Foamed metallic WTC dust made up (largely) of iron fragments. If I had some funding (aside from my own income), I'd have better pics, but those that I have still tell the story.

 

[WTC Dust]

The top one looks like an ordinary clinker out of a coal-fired furnace.

Do you see the two colors?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Do you see the two colors?

I did. I saw two different layers with two different shades. One darker than the other. You scraped this off a ledge, right?


I have an initial suggestion: One layer is typical city grit and grime, built up over many years. The other layer is dissimilar because of an event which threw into the air a lot of dust and dirt of a different consistency than typical, and built up a thick layer in a short time.

There's a hypothesis. How would you use your science skills to go about confirming or refuting it?

 

[Dash80]

I'm not a photographer! I didn't take these images, and I didn't pay for these images to be taken. When you ask someone to take images as a favor, you sort of have to accept what you get.

It shows the point. Foamed metallic WTC dust made up (largely) of iron fragments. If I had some funding (aside from my own income), I'd have better pics, but those that I have still tell the story.

Foamed metallic dust...

 

[WTC Dust]

I did. I saw two different layers with two different shades. One darker than the other. You scraped this off a ledge, right?


I have an initial suggestion: One layer is typical city grit and grime, built up over many years. The other layer is dissimilar because of an event which threw into the air a lot of dust and dirt of a different consistency than typical, and built up a thick layer in a short time.

There's a hypothesis. How would you use your science skills to go about confirming or refuting it?

Been done already. Street dust samples collected, analyzed, compared. Nope. It ain't street dust.

 

[WTC Dust]

Foamed metallic dust...

You laugh, but I'm serious.

The material ended up a foam because of the nature of the iron fragments. They have sharp edges. They don't compact as well as smooth, round crystals might.

 

[carlitos]

You laugh, but I'm serious.

A perfect summary of the JREF 9/11 subforum, circa 2013.

 

[LSSBB]

A perfect summary of the JREF 9/11 subforum, circa 2013.

+1

 

[NoahFence]

I'm not a photographer! I didn't take these images, and I didn't pay for these images to be taken. When you ask someone to take images as a favor, you sort of have to accept what you get.

It shows the point. Foamed metallic WTC dust made up (largely) of iron fragments. If I had some funding (aside from my own income), I'd have better pics, but those that I have still tell the story.

Why didn't you take the images? You're the frickin scientist.

Or are you a liar?

 

[Dash80]

You laugh, but I'm serious.

The material ended up a foam because of the nature of the iron fragments. They have sharp edges. They don't compact as well as smooth, round crystals might.

Sharp edged iron foamed metallic dust..

x1000

Pffft...

I've recently found foamed leprechun dung gold dust, prove me wrong.

 

[Skibum]

I'm not a photographer! I didn't take these images, and I didn't pay for these images to be taken. When you ask someone to take images as a favor, you sort of have to accept what you get.

It shows the point. Foamed metallic WTC dust made up (largely) of iron fragments. If I had some funding (aside from my own income), I'd have better pics, but those that I have still tell the story.

So your friend doesn't accept McDonald's gift cards in exchange for favors?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

Been done already. Street dust samples collected, analyzed, compared. Nope. It ain't street dust.

Why did you compare dirt you scraped off a high ledge with dirt from the street? Do streets remain uncleaned from decade to decade in your neighbourhood?

 

[Jack by the hedge]

You laugh, but I'm serious.

The material ended up a foam because of the nature of the iron fragments. They have sharp edges. They don't compact as well as smooth, round crystals might.

In all these years, have you ever looked up the definition of the term "foam"?

 

[Resume]

Anyone? Beuller?

He called. He wants you to know everyone has moved on because no one in possession of their faculties believes that the towers were dustified (foamified) by a sooper-seekrit directed energy doohickey.

 

[tsig]

Why didn't you take the images? You're the frickin scientist.

Or are you a liar?

If she's a scientist then by truther logic she is a liar because all scientists lie about 911 to protect their jobs.

 

[tsig]

He called. He wants you to know everyone has moved on because no one in possession of their faculties believes that the towers were dustified (foamified) by a sooper-seekrit directed energy doohickey.

Surely you mean doughickey 'cause I have visual graphic evidence that the towers were sucked down by the Pillsbury Doughboy.

Here's a link:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...=vSFm6AwIuC9paO8rEZ29QQ&bvm=bv.44342787,d.b2I

 

[Dash80]

Do you see the two colors?

Yep, I do.

There were cigarette butts nearby right?

See the two different colors in this "dust?"