A question for Jedi Knight

gnome

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Aug 5, 2001
Messages
14,870
From this thread:
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16378

Originally posted by Jedi Knight:
The entire women's movement is a scam and an extortionist shakedown against men. There are no "battered" women in America, only men.

I really cannot let you go without asking you to respond to this preposterous statement. The first sentence is an opinion, one that I disagree with but which you are entitled to. The second, however, is a blatant falsehood. I invited you multiple times to rephrase it (or to affirm that you mean it literally) and you chose to move on to other threads instead.

No, you do not have to answer to me. Feel free to continue to ignore it. But I think that will say something about your debating integrity that you will drop a bomb like that and then run away from it, because you know it to be indefensible.

On the other hand, you could come back and back up your words, clarify what you meant, admit that you were exaggerating, or even perhaps that you were a bit riled up and said something untrue.

The increase in your credibility would be astounding.
 
gnome said:
From this thread:
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16378



I invited you multiple times to rephrase it (or to affirm that you mean it literally) and you chose to move on to other threads instead.

No, you do not have to answer to me. Feel free to continue to ignore it.

JK does this often. I have challenged him recently on a claim he made and the challenge has been met with silence.
 
gnome said:
From this thread:
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=16378



I really cannot let you go without asking you to respond to this preposterous statement. The first sentence is an opinion, one that I disagree with but which you are entitled to. The second, however, is a blatant falsehood. I invited you multiple times to rephrase it (or to affirm that you mean it literally) and you chose to move on to other threads instead.

No, you do not have to answer to me. Feel free to continue to ignore it. But I think that will say something about your debating integrity that you will drop a bomb like that and then run away from it, because you know it to be indefensible.

On the other hand, you could come back and back up your words, clarify what you meant, admit that you were exaggerating, or even perhaps that you were a bit riled up and said something untrue.

The increase in your credibility would be astounding.

OK, let me rephrase it.

There are no "battered" women in America. The myth of battered women in America is due to the noisy matriarchal terrorists, the American Medina Matriarchal Totalitarian Feminazi Brigades. Men are the true victims and the "battered" in America.

JK
 
Re: Re: A question for Jedi Knight

Jedi Knight said:


OK, let me rephrase it.

There are no "battered" women in America. The myth of battered women in America is due to the noisy matriarchal terrorists, the American Medina Matriarchal Totalitarian Feminazi Brigades. Men are the true victims and the "battered" in America.

JK

Do you really believe that Jedi? Or are you just trying to get a rise out of people.

There are many services to help battered women and their children get out of relationships. I could see how you might think that some women enjoy the relationships because they do not avail themselves of those services. Sometimes that is the case, but I think you are painting the problem with too broad a brush IF that is what you think. That's a big if in there if you didn't notice it.
 
Re: Re: A question for Jedi Knight

Jedi Knight said:

There are no "battered" women in America. The myth of battered women in America is due to the noisy matriarchal terrorists, the American Medina Matriarchal Totalitarian Feminazi Brigades. Men are the true victims and the "battered" in America.

JK

Ok, I'm really trying to give you every chance here. Perhaps we're disagreeing on terms? By "battery" I mean a nonconsensual physical striking of someone. By most reports this happens to men and women. Are you actually saying that this never happens to women?

Everyone that's ever reported, witnessed, or treated a case like this is telling a lie?
 
Re: Re: Re: A question for Jedi Knight

gnome said:


Ok, I'm really trying to give you every chance here. Perhaps we're disagreeing on terms? By "battery" I mean a nonconsensual physical striking of someone. By most reports this happens to men and women. Are you actually saying that this never happens to women?

Everyone that's ever reported, witnessed, or treated a case like this is telling a lie?

Batter (in terms of women's reality in America)--1. Mixture of flour, milk, etc. For baking a cake.

Batter (in terms of men's reality in America as the true victims)--1. Strike Repeatedly 2. Injure by hard use (by women and the matriarchal terror apparatus)

JK
 
Re: Re: Re: A question for Jedi Knight

Denise said:


Do you really believe that Jedi? Or are you just trying to get a rise out of people.

There are many services to help battered women and their children get out of relationships. I could see how you might think that some women enjoy the relationships because they do not avail themselves of those services. Sometimes that is the case, but I think you are painting the problem with too broad a brush IF that is what you think. That's a big if in there if you didn't notice it.

Hi Denise. ;)

JK
 
Re: Re: A question for Jedi Knight

Jedi Knight said:
There are no "battered" women in America. The myth of battered women in America is due to the noisy matriarchal terrorists, the American Medina Matriarchal Totalitarian Feminazi Brigades. Men are the true victims and the "battered" in America.

HAHAHAHA! Oh, you make my sides hurt! So, is true? The female in America whips the poor men?

Maybe America should send the women to Baghdad to kick my ass, eh?

I will be waiting. :cool:
 
So when my first husband drank a bottle of Scotch, tried to break my arms, sending me to the emergency room, I just misunderstood?
 
Lisa said:
So when my first husband drank a bottle of Scotch, tried to break my arms, sending me to the emergency room, I just misunderstood?

Lisa, you just don't understand. Your real (and disgustingly offensive, not due to you) experience doesn't count, because it's part of the "leftism" that Jedi wishes to lie out of existance. :mad:

I think Jedi is half troll, and half male supremicist, anti-gay apologist. I'm not sure (yet) what his position on race is, not having stumbled upon, or stepped into, it.

As you may have guessed, this is not a positive assesement of him in my personal opinion.

Btw, I hope Mr. Creep is looking at some big iron bars?
 
Dunno. I handed him his walking papers, put in for an assignment to Korea and left. Told him he could have all the stuff that was in storage, just never contact me again.
 
He's a delusional misogynist who justifies violence against women. Don't know why any one puts up with him.
 
Clearly JK is half troll. And it also looks like he has some issues with women. Did a girlfriend beat him up and now he is ashamed of it? JK, there are groups you could attend that might help you with your problem.

Lurker
 

Back
Top Bottom