Nessie
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2012
- Messages
- 16,202
Compulsory for what purpose?
There is no law requiring home insurance. However, no lender will give you a mortgage without it, and letting your insurance lapse is grounds for forclosure, so unless you don't have a mortgage, then you need insurance. And if you don't have a mortgage (ie, you own your house outright), then you'd be a fool not to protect it with insurance. So the rate of insurance among homeowners is certainly close to 100%. But no laws were required to make it so.
OK, thanks for that. Is vehicle insurance compulsory?
Home insurance covers accidents on your property, even ones caused by negligence. The accident you described is not excluded from most insurance plans, so therefore it would be covered.
Can you evidence that please. (A much nicer way of doing things than WildCats abusive reaction to claims about UK car insurance and what is covered)
The incentive won't work. We've already been over that. And I note that you failed to answer my question in any way. What is the scope of the problem you think this will solve? How many third party victims of lawfully owned firearm accidents are unable to recover damages from the responsible party?
I don't know, do you? If it turns out home insurance is already covers gun owners when they shoot someone and is paying out, then AFAIAK this has become a resolved issue.