• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
JayUtah said:
Not quite. When Robert says "fact," what he is in fact presenting (lately) is stuff he's cribbed from Jim Marrs' book. As I said earlier, Robert long ago left off attaching the names of his authors to the claims he borrowed from them. I surmise initially he thought citing his sources would give him some sort of authority. Now he's changed his tack to accuse his critics of mindlessly following the herd, so it doesn't do well for him to admit he's just copying out of books. He did tacitly admit to this a few pages back, when he characterized his authors not as the "authorities" they are (what does he think the words "author" and "authority" mean?), but as some kind of transparent conduit of truth.

So when Robert is told to believe something by an author, there's nothing wrong with that in his mind. That's what makes him the pinnacle of erudition. But when people point out the simple, obvious flaws in those borrowed claims, and apply their own skill and knowledge, then to Robert it's just an "amen chorus" of "low information sheeple."

Robert's gibberish isn't even original.
Click to expand...



Oh no you're not saying its previously pwned fringe gibberish are you?
 
Lee Harvey Oswald = John Patler
- Born: October 18, 1939 = January 6, 1938
- Parents separated when 5 years-old = ditto (father killed mother)
- Born in: New Orleans, grew up there, Ft. Worth and NYC (inc. East Harlem and the Bronx) = Born in NYC lived in East Harlem and the Bronx.
- Siblings: 1brother, 1 half brother (no sisters) = 1brother (no sisters)
- Detained Youth House (NYC): April – May 1953 = “a little over 2 weeks” 1953/4 ?
- USMC: 1956 – 9 = 1958 – 60,
- Dishonorable Discharge* = ditto
- Married: 19 year-old girlfriend 1961 (separated 1963) = 17 year old girlfriend 1960 (divorced 1964)
- Communist but had right-wing friends = Neo-Nazi, expelled for "Bolshevikleanings."
- Believed to have shot and killed US President JFK in his car from the 6th floor of a building 1963
= Shot and killed US Nazi party president George Lincoln Rockwell in his car from roof of building 1967
- Used a European gun (Carcano rifle) = ditto (Mauser pistol)
- Arrested on the street: by patrolmen (previously took bus) = arrested at a bus stop by patrolman
- JFK shot twice (according to WC etc.) = Rockwell shot twice
- JFK born 1917 studied at Harvard = Rockwell born 1918 studied at Brown
- JFK was a USN officer in the Pacific = ditto Rockwell
- JFK worked and lived in DC 1950s – 60s = ditto Rockwell (OK Arlington VA)

* Originally given hardship discharge, but it was changed to dishonorable after his defection

Sources: Wikipedia and http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=80317 , note the latter is a White Supremacist site some may find the content offensive


So does anybody believe these were all 'just' coincidences?
 
Last edited:
jargon buster said:
By "coincidences" do you mean different things happened to different people at different times?
Click to expand...

No I meant same/similar things happening at same similar times to two 1960s political assassins. But I do think they were just coincidences, Jefferson and Adams died hours apart on July 4, 1826, the 50th anniversary of signing of the Declaration of Independence.
 
Lenbrazil said:
No I meant same/similar things happening at same similar times to two 1960s political assassins. But I do think they were just coincidences, Jefferson and Adams died hours apart on July 4, 1826, the 50th anniversary of signing of the Declaration of Independence.
Click to expand...

So in other words people to whose past have passing similarities may take actions with passing similarities?

How about you give us an alternate explanation then offer evidence for it other than passing semblance that aren't all that simaler at all.
 
JayUtah said:
Yeah, that was your parting shot in the Birther thread, where you didn't understand any of the technical argument there either. Other people seem to understand me just fine (both there and here), so what's your problem? By all means keep professing your ignorance. Other people are quite able to decide for themselves which of us makes more sense, and they don't need you desperately trying to make them believe your critics are confused.
Click to expand...

Oh your gibberish is baby simple to understand since it is completely and totally devoid of any substance whatever. That's why it's gibberish.
 
Robert Prey said:
Oh your gibberish is baby simple to understand since it is completely and totally devoid of any substance whatever. That's why it's gibberish.
Click to expand...

His post was not gibberish. JFK conspiracy theories involving everyone in sight and out of sight at the time are gibberish. Perhaps you should watch the Red Dwarf ''Tikka To Ride'' episode. The best JFK conspiracy theory ever, even more entertaining than all the other JFK assassination theories.
 
Last edited:
dafydd said:
His post was not gibberish. JFK conspiracy theories involving everyone in sight and out of sight at the time are gibberish.
Click to expand...

But my singular contention has always been "more than one". More than one equals conspiracy. Everyone in sight? that's a low information Lone Nutter's poor attempt at sarcasm and hyperbole. Jay's posts are indeed gibberish -- a substitute for substance of which he has none. Zero, and of which you also have none. Birds of a feather flock together.
 
aggle-rithm said:
Originally Posted by JayUtah
And how do you make a latent print with a corpse?
Especially since:

Originally Posted by Robert Prey

Latona then processed the complete weapon but developed no identifiable prints. He stated that the poor quality of the wood and the metal would cause the rifle to absorb moisture from the skin, thereby making a clear print unlikely.______________
Click to expand...

Who says the fake print was a legitimate print? Warren Counsel Lee Rankin questioned it's authenticity in the previously referred to memo:


"Mr. Rankin advised because of the circumstances that now exist there was
a serious question in the minds of the Commission as to whether or not the palm impression that has been obtained from the Dallas Police Department is a legitimate latent palm impression removed from the rifle barrel or whether it was obtained from some other source and that for this reason this matter needs to be resolved."

http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weis... FBI Records From 1-8-78 Releases/Item 39.pdf
 
Last edited:
Robert Prey said:
But my singular contention has always been "more than one". More than one equals conspiracy. Everyone in sight? that's a low information Lone Nutter's poor attempt at sarcasm and hyperbole. Jay's posts are indeed gibberish -- a substitute for substance of which he has none. Zero, and of which you also have none. Birds of a feather flock together.
Click to expand...

I'm glad that you have found a lifelong hobby. Will there still be JFK conspiracy fans around in a hundred years time?
 
Last edited:
Robert Prey said:
But my singular contention has always been "more than one". More than one equals conspiracy. Everyone in sight? that's a low information Lone Nutter's poor attempt at sarcasm and hyperbole. Jay's posts are indeed gibberish -- a substitute for substance of which he has none. Zero, and of which you also have none. Birds of a feather flock together.
Click to expand...

Nope. You lose. :wink:
 
I wonder what the JFK CT fans will do if they are proved right? (It's not going to happen, but bear with me.) Will they dig up LBJ's and the other conspirators remains and put them on trial?
 
I wonder what the JFK CT fans will do if they are proved right?
Click to expand...
Thats simple, they wont believe it, they will think its a story to throw them off what "really" happened and they will come up with another conspiracy to allow them that "Im in on something you're not" air of authority.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom