I'm still practicing but I find myself constantly still saying style of cause instead of title of proceedings. And a whole bunch of the other 'old' terms.
Anyway, I couldn't upload these to docstoc properly so I took a shot at adding them to the WordPress thing I thought about starting recently. Let's see if you can read them here:
http://legaltainment.wordpress.com/menard/
Apparently, you posting this was "playing right into [Menard's] hands," and now he's going to send you a Norwich Order, because you're an admin. Or so he says on Facebook.


Pretty much correct. The only caveat would be that it looks like Menard was trying to get disclosure from a non-party, which is certainly available and quite common (I did it lots of times during my 11-year legal career) but typically requires that the non-party be served with the application and given an opportunity to speak to it. If Menard didn't do that, it might be why he didn't get a real order (if he didn't) and bluffed the community centre.
I posted to a WordPress site a public document that he authored and filed with a court - tell him good luck with that.
The fellow clearly doesn't have a clue.
Robert Menard on Facebook said:LashL, I am more than ok with that... I actually appreciate it.
It is not about you posting documents at all. It is about you revealing your identity to the courts. They have that now. Now you may ask why that is important, when you have done nothing wrong.
Finding out your identity is simply a matter of looking at the records the court holds. Then I know who you are. Then I know exactly who to send the court order to. When you receive one forcing you to give the information you have revealing the identity and IP address of D'rok, arayder and JB, will you still be laughing?
It's not about punishing you for posting public documents, you silly twit. It is about knowing who you are, and forcing you to reveal information you have.
Assuming that the centre's counsel aren't idiots and that Menard doesn't have a signed order, surely something odd must be going on.Menard said:[8] The Plaintiff was informed that on the advice of counsel, Kate Longpre would not release the defamatory email, which would identify the Defendant, unless presented with a court order to do so.
Damages in the amount of $50,000.
Lol, I was going to look that up and send him a Christmas card.Oh, in case anyone's interested, Rob's address for service is HOC Patients Society, some form of holistic health provider.
Menard claims to have received the smoking email from Kate Longpre but also claims, on form 1, under Claim of the Plaintiff; Part 1: STATEMENT OF FACTS, thatAssuming that the centre's counsel aren't idiots and that Menard doesn't have a signed order, surely something odd must be going on.
If you discount the genuine possibility of flat out lying on Menard's part, that is.
He never had one.Surely he should be made to hand back his Freeman membership card or something...?
.... How does knowing the name of a forum administrator provide anything new to the process that is already available.
that should be added to his freeman namefailing so badly.
He never had one.
All he has ever had is a "silver tongue" and a halfwitted plan designed to separate idiots from their money.
It's only ever been about money, all his bleating about "little Elizabeth" as his justification for his chosen path were lies.
His whole existence is based on lies, it's so bad I'm convinced if he told the truth he would actually disappear.