General Israel/Palestine discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Palestinians wanted their own state, the Zionists wanted a state right where the Palestinians did.

And the British were nice enough to liberate it from the Turks and split it between them.

The Likud extremists are still intent on a Greater Israel, which means settlements, which they are in the process of expanding.

And the likes of Hamas are still intent on a greater Palestine and are willing to fire missiles and kill people to achieve it.

Once again, it could have been Indonesians seeking to create a state there

Sorry this is just silly. No one argues that the area was the traditional home of Israel and the Jewish people long before it was controlled by Islam and the Arabs and that the Jewish people have a link to it because of that. Exactly what link do the Indonesians have to it?

the Palestinians didn't pick on Jews specifically, it was the Zionists who thought it would be a good idea
.

The Zionists thought it was a good idea for the Palestinians to pick on the Jews?
 
But what if Israel just developed a missile shield so the rockets wouldn't be a problem in the first place? What if they built a wall along the border to funnel traffic through checkpoints so that HAMAS couldn't import weapons? What if they sent massive amounts of aid for the Palestinians to live better lives? What if they gave up land, even territories given to them by the UN?

Oh, wait, that's right -- Israel does all these things, and the world either turns a blind eye or calls it "terrorism".
:(

The West Bank has plenty of checkpoints that serve no purpose at all, their existence serves to strangle the social cohesion of the community, impeded business, humiliate.
The Palestinians don't want aid, they want what they see as justice, their own state.

Oh. Let's get up to date, then. Here's what HAMAS has to say on the matter:

http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/3657.htm

You watched these films when they were uploaded, right, since they're so important to understanding the conflict and all?

Oh. Guess you didn't.

I don't recall ever defending Hamas. What are you trying to convince me of? The recent conflict has just reinforced the fact that they pose no existential threat to Israel.

But if today's campaigns to kill Jews is about them building houses to live in (the nerve!), what about the Jews who faced threats and violence in the area before Israel was even founded? Or the six million who died in the Holocaust? Or the untold Jews who were persecuted and killed before then?

Building houses is not all this is about. You still don't seem to grasp that idea. This is about taking land from the Palestinians. Wars have started over similar acts. Internationally, this is seen as illegal, the US included, Israel's biggest ally.

To pretend that Israelis are hated today because of something they've done recently is to ignore most of European and Middle-Eastern history.

History is full of wars and hatred. I don't hate Israel, Bob Carr doesn't hate Israel. The vote in the UN wasn't about hatred.

What an odd statement to make. Israel is building "settlements" (strange how that word seems to never be used for any building project elsewhere in the world, such as Russian housing in occupied Finnish areas:confused:) in areas they intend to hold onto. They're not "expanding" anything, they're making use of land they won't ever give up anyway, as anyone else would.

See, that's the thing. If that land that is being settled now is land that Israel under Likud is never going to give up, it makes pretty well most of the West Bank the same. Which is what Israel's friends don't want to see it doing. The settlements is a term that is widely used, nothing strange about it. That is what they are.

The Arabs started a war to wipe Israel off the map, and they were defeated, and lost territory in the process. Sad for them, but that's how the world goes. Lots of other countries have gained and lost land in the meantime (such as Germany to Poland and Finland to Russia), but funnily enough, it seems most of them manage to move on and let bygones be bygones.

The Israeli's knew that war would start, for the same reason any similar war starts.

Europe has had enough of war for a while, after WWII and the Cold war. Polling suggests the majority of Israeli's and Palestinians also think the same.

Might be because Finland, say, isn't ruled by a bunch of crazed terrorists who swear to wipe Russia off the map...

It doesn't.

As they have, countless times. They make recessions, they give up land, they make peace proposals, they build infrastructure in Gaza, they send massive amounts of aid...

What concession. Netanyahu has boasted how he made sure Oslo would not work. He never made any concession, now he is the Israeli PM.

They're rewarded by hatred and murder.

Can you read minds now?
I can see actions, just as the allies of Israel can.

I don't know who Bob Carr is, and I don't give a damn what he says.
Sure. What does your Government say? They voted in favour of the motion, Australia just abstained.


Malnutrition is a huge problem in Gaza. It functions now as a huge concentration camp. Due to it's 'artificial' borders, there is a population there that is much larger than any farming can support. It's borders are closed off, so Israel can either feed the Gazan's, or watch them starve. Other Israeli leaders have noted the problem in the past, by keeping them in that state, Israel becomes responsible for them.
How are settlements in Israel making life harder in Palestine? I don't understand.

The settlements take land that is necessary for a viable state. They create a huge criss cross series of settlements, checkpoints, roads and barriers that make a normal civil life very difficult. They tell Palestinians that their home may be next. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Westbankjan06.jpg
 
Last edited:
Abbas does want to negotiate a Palestinian State. However, the last time a negotiation was done with the Israeli PM, he deliberately made sure the negotiations were not made in good faith, as he has said himself. IIRC, Abbas wants a negotiation to be short and to the point. Any protracted process or complex outcome is not going to be good enough. The result has to be pretty well understood by both parties when they begin that they are going to have a result.

Expanding settlements is just another sign of bad faith of any intention to negotiate. That is why the rest of the world, including many long time Israeli allies and friends, want it to commit to something tangible itself.

Sorry, but rhetoric like "not in good faith" doesn't fly unless we're living in the world of BS. What they insist upon is that all their demands are met BEFORE they negotiate. Which is no different than saying they refuse to negotiate as it defeats the purpose of negotiating. If all their demands are first met, what exactly would they negotiate? Right, nothing.

Refusing to negotiate unless all demands are first met is not only a refusal to negotiate, it's a sign of bad intention and as bad a faith as it gets. It demonstrates absolutely NO intention to negotiate. So until the rest of the world starts acknowledging this and not playing to this bigoted rhetoric, there will be no negotiations. Until PA decides it's time to act like adults and sit down to negotiate, there will be no peace no matter how much you dishonestly try to put the blame all on one side.
 
The West Bank has plenty of checkpoints that serve no purpose at all, their existence serves to strangle the social cohesion of the community, impeded business, humiliate.
The Palestinians don't want aid, they want what they see as justice, their own state.

Tell that to all the people who died from suicide bombings. Those check points are a result of that. If they didn't want check points, they should have thought of that before they decided to use such tactics. Those check points have greatly reduced those attacks and without Israel having to strike back. The alternative would mean a lot more Palestinian deaths. Israel took the high road in defending against these vicious attacks.

They don't want justice. They could have everything they wanted. It's in their hands. They need to simply stop attacking the Jews and negotiate the borders. So long as they continue to keep attacking and refusing to negotiate, there will be no peace. No matter how much you dishonestly blame only one side.


Building houses is not all this is about. You still don't seem to grasp that idea. This is about taking land from the Palestinians. Wars have started over similar acts. Internationally, this is seen as illegal, the US included, Israel's biggest ally.

But they didn't take land from them. It's a dispute. Dishonestly calling it stealing doesn't help the situation when you're debating people who aren't gullible. It's only seen as illegal by the UN who makes up their own rules based on their opinions. The UN has no right to make such claims and they cannot back those claims up.


History is full of wars and hatred. I don't hate Israel, Bob Carr doesn't hate Israel. The vote in the UN wasn't about hatred.

Oh it most certainly was. The UN has a well known history of hatred and dishonesty. Don't insult us by pretending the UN has good intentions.


See, that's the thing. If that land that is being settled now is land that Israel under Likud is never going to give up, it makes pretty well most of the West Bank the same. Which is what Israel's friends don't want to see it doing. The settlements is a term that is widely used, nothing strange about it. That is what they are.

Then perhaps the PA should have gone forward with negotiations instead of refusing to negotiate unless their demands were met as a precondition? Their actions are the same as saying they will never give up their claim to all of the land, so why should Israel continue to wait around for them if they have no intention of negotiating the borders?

Malnutrition is a huge problem in Gaza. It functions now as a huge concentration camp. Due to it's 'artificial' borders, there is a population there that is much larger than any farming can support. It's borders are closed off, so Israel can either feed the Gazan's, or watch them starve. Other Israeli leaders have noted the problem in the past, by keeping them in that state, Israel becomes responsible for them.

I am sure the people in their many luxury shopping malls are in agony. It's not a concentration camp at all. They get plenty of aid. They don't prosper as much as they could though because they elected a government who spends their money on wastefully launching rockets on the Jews instead of investing it in their own people.


The settlements take land that is necessary for a viable state. They create a huge criss cross series of settlements, checkpoints, roads and barriers that make a normal civil life very difficult. They tell Palestinians that their home may be next. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Westbankjan06.jpg

Nonesense. This notion that they cannot prosper unless they have specific pieces of land? How can I take such a statement seriously? And when other countries controlled that land and didn't start a Palestinian state, why no complaints then? Right, because this is not what it's really about. Israel is just an excuse to use to avoid taking responsibility for themselves.
 
(from another thread Craig derailed)

Yes. In particular I was talking about illegally annexed territory, and its illegal settlement following the sequestration of lands left by the legal owners fleeing war. If you can't understand these concepts (and I am sorry to hear that) then look at this BBC report on the area to which I was alluding. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-14724842 After that, may we get back on topic please?
Israel wouldn't have annexed any territory at all if the Arabs hadn't launched their wars to genocide the Jews. Gaza would be amuch better place if the peole there didn't elect yet another Arab party promising a Jewish genocide.

Do you think there's anything at all the Palestinians could do for peace Craig? Like maybe not support genocidal terrorist groups? Stop with the ridiculous demand that 6 million "refugees" be allowed to "return" to Israel? Not launching artillery attacks on civilians?

As for Golan it would still be Syria if they hadn't repeatedly launched attacks from it to destroy the Jews. Just what was Syria's interest in the Israel-Palestine conflict anyway, other than they just really really hate Jews? They certainly have no love for Palestinians, in fact they have no rights whatsoever in Syria, yet for some reason you aren't concerned about that.
 
Malnutrition is a huge problem in Gaza.
Possibly, but how is this Israel's fault? If you want to complain about lack of food, shouldn't you blame either

a) Countries that don't give them ungodly amounts of aid, or
b) HAMAS, which, as Johnny pointed out, spends all of their money on their ongoing terrorism campaign, and basically uses its own civilians as propaganda props and refuses to care for them?
 
Last edited:
The West Bank has plenty of checkpoints that serve no purpose at all, their existence serves to strangle the social cohesion of the community, impeded business, humiliate.
The Palestinians don't want aid, they want what they see as justice, their own state.

I don't recall ever defending Hamas. What are you trying to convince me of? The recent conflict has just reinforced the fact that they pose no existential threat to Israel.

Building houses is not all this is about. You still don't seem to grasp that idea. This is about taking land from the Palestinians. Wars have started over similar acts. Internationally, this is seen as illegal, the US included, Israel's biggest ally.

History is full of wars and hatred. I don't hate Israel, Bob Carr doesn't hate Israel. The vote in the UN wasn't about hatred.

See, that's the thing. If that land that is being settled now is land that Israel under Likud is never going to give up, it makes pretty well most of the West Bank the same. Which is what Israel's friends don't want to see it doing. The settlements is a term that is widely used, nothing strange about it. That is what they are.

You seem to be missing/ignoring the main point here.

The only reason that there is no real Palestinian state today is because most of Israel's neighbors who attacked them before, as well as Hamas today will not accept a Palestinian state with any living Israeli as a neighbor.

Hamas has said that they would not accept a Palestinian state regardless of whatever concessions Israel makes.
 
This is about taking land from the Palestinians. Wars have started over similar acts. Internationally, this is seen as illegal, the US included, Israel's biggest ally.
Now you're putting words into HAMAS' mouth. As I already pointed out to you, they fight not to "defend their country" (which is not at threat in the first place) but to bring about the destruction of the State of Israel and the death of the Israeli people. This is the official stance of HAMAS, as repeated on their 25th anniversary just, oh, a week ago.

Either way, since the Arabs in Israel and Palestine have only lived there for 100-200 years and the very idea of "Palestinian people" (as opposed to "Arabs who happen to live in that particular area" only originated in about 1967, it's not as if Israel is contesting borders that have existed for thousands of years. Before 1947, there was no Palestine as a separate entity, there was a British colony with state-owned land on which Arabs and Jews settled. Before that, it was part of the Ottoman Empire.

Oh, and there's the fact that the Jordanians "illegally occupy" far larger parts of Palestine than does Israel, yet funnily enough we never hear cries for "boycott of Jordanian goods" or people supporting the right of Palestinians to blow themselves up on Jordanian buses.

The settlements is a term that is widely used, nothing strange about it. That is what they are.
Funny, a Google search for "Russian settlement"+Finland yielded precisely zero hits.
 
Last edited:
For your listening pleasure...

The Hamas Theme Song

Fixed link.

Note the part at the 55 second mark where the kid playing the terrorist role even has a doll to represent his baby human shield.
 
Last edited:
You seem to be missing/ignoring the main point here.

The only reason that there is no real Palestinian state today is because most of Israel's neighbors who attacked them before, as well as Hamas today will not accept a Palestinian state with any living Israeli as a neighbor.

Hamas has said that they would not accept a Palestinian state regardless of whatever concessions Israel makes.

No, the the Israeli PM has made it clear, he wants the West Bank to be assimilated into Israel, and never intended to honour the Oslo agreement. This is not a one sided issue. On the other hand, polls indicate the majority of Israelis and Palestinians want peace and a two state solution.
 
No, the the Israeli PM has made it clear, he wants the West Bank to be assimilated into Israel, and never intended to honour the Oslo agreement. This is not a one sided issue. On the other hand, polls indicate the majority of Israelis and Palestinians want peace and a two state solution.

“We remain committed, as you said, to a negotiated settlement between us and our Palestinian neighbors,” Netanyahu continued, “That solution is a two-state solution for two peoples, a peace in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the one and only Jewish State of Israel. Unfortunately, on Thursday, the Palestinians asked the world to give them a state without providing Israel with peace and security in return.”
-Cite (12/5/12)
 
And just in case people think this is a new position by Netanyahu...
"In my vision of peace," he said, "in this small land of ours, two peoples live freely, side-by-side, in amity and mutual respect, each with its own flag and national anthem."
-ABC News, June 14, 2009
 
“We remain committed, as you said, to a negotiated settlement between us and our Palestinian neighbors,” Netanyahu continued, “That solution is a two-state solution for two peoples, a peace in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the one and only Jewish State of Israel. Unfortunately, on Thursday, the Palestinians asked the world to give them a state without providing Israel with peace and security in return.”
-Cite (12/5/12)

And just in case people think this is a new position by Netanyahu...
"In my vision of peace," he said, "in this small land of ours, two peoples live freely, side-by-side, in amity and mutual respect, each with its own flag and national anthem."
-ABC News, June 14, 2009
Excellent posts, therefore a_u_p will ignore them.

Compare/contrast to what Meshaal said last week in his triumphant return to Gaza.
 
Oh I am pretty sure what his reaction will be. The settlements are making a two state solution untenable. I disagree. I think settlements mean the West Bank is losing whatever leverage they may have to negotiate. Eventually Israel will simply declare some borders and will only negotiate security issues and cash payments, deeming the borders established by fiat.

If the Palestinians want some actual say in the borders they have to sit down at the table in earnest and soon. Else they will find opportunity has passed them by and all the UN recognition in the world will not enable them to rewrite the borders.
 
No, the the Israeli PM has made it clear, he wants the West Bank to be assimilated into Israel
...after Israel offered up the West Bank to Palestine in 2001 and 2008... and they declined.

HAMAS is free to decline any offer of peace that comes their way. They do not, however, have the right to sit there and whine afterwards when they don't get what they said no too.
 
Speaking of the West Bank:
The Islamic militant group Hamas staged on Thursday its first public demonstration in the West Bank since 2007, illustrating its improving ties with the rival Fatah movement after a five-year rift.

The show of force by Hamas reflected the group's popularity in Palestinian society following an eight-day battle against Israel last month and its rising influence as Islamists rise to power across the region.

Hamas said about 5,000 supporters of the Islamic militant group took to the streets in Nablus after prayers Thursday.

Marchers chanted, "Hamas -- you are the guns; we are the bullets," and, "Hamas, fire more rockets on Tel Aviv." Some women held models of the rockets Gaza militants fired at Israeli cities in last month's fighting.

Fatah can't claim they are working for a 2 state solution while at the same time courting a party whose goal is a one state solution following a Jewish genocide.

No wonder they can't find the time to amend that Covenant!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom