Mister Oystein. Enough already. I am well aware of your contention. Of your conclusions.
Of your wit and charm.
...but have no facts and arguments to counter them. Understood.
Now it is time to formalize it. Write it up, present your case with your name on it so that it can be properly tested against the Bentham paper.
I have much of it written, rather formally:
http://oystein-debate.blogspot.de/
The name doesn't matter - the arguments do.
My understanding is Bentham must be replied to in the literature. After-which, your contention becomes open to further peer review in an on-going process.
Your understaning is incorrect. Scientific debate can progress in many venues. Bentham was a poor choice - no scientists with integrity respects it. No one is required to go there. Nothing has come of this paper - it is an ongoing embarrassment for its authors.
Steven Jones is personally aware of my contentions, and you saw him run away from them, didn't you?
AE911Truth is aware of Millette's data and main conclusion, told their member base they would reply - but we saw them run away from it, didn't we?
You have to set it out so it can be presented alongside the Bentham paper, in argument, cross-referenced, right there and then; open for expert appraisal.
The actual experts don't care. None of the autors - not Jones, not Farrer, not Harrit, not Ryan - is an expert in the relevant fields, and no experts read that vanity jpurnal. The paper has had zero impact among the experts.
Oh, until James Millkette came along. Guess what - Millette puts Harrit e.al. ti bed - will you be the last to notice?
A matter as important as this ...
Wrong.
The matter is very unimportant. Paint in dust? Yawn.
must go through serious professional yin-yang before you get to call the numbers.
Wrong. Serious professionals have much more important things to do. For example James Millette, he has a serious forensic lab to run, actual litigations to settle, actual crimes to solve - not the fantasy role games that Truthers play.
It's up to amateurs like myself, with a weird fascination for some morbid theme on the fringe of society, to hold up the mirror to the deluded.
Something other than jet fuel and gravity brought those buildings down,
No.
Can you point to any professional publication that says this?
and Bentham is the only paper to date tried to tell us anything other than the same old bull.
No. Bentham cashed a cheque and wrote a thank-you note.
You produce your case in a way that a Professional can understand it.
Already done. The professional in question - Prof Jones, who needs to admit to having committed this folly - ran away.
So that I or anyone else can lay your contention on a Professors desk and not have to find out you are as big a dick as you suggest the authors of Bentham are.
You did lay it on a professors desk, remember? Said professor ran away.
Because this isn't about me. And this isn't about you. This is about the spooks of 9 1 1 .
No, it is about a bunch of deluded, sometimes dishonest, fringers.
