• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Bigfoot: The Patterson Gimlin Film - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
SweatyYeti said:
Patty's cheekbone becomes lit-up by the sunlight in Frame 348, LT. Therefore...the direct sunlight could very well also be shining in her eyes.

Hence...the lowering of her eyebrow. :)
Click to expand...

She's winking at the boys, just doing a little flirty footing.
 
SweatyYeti said:
Why couldn't it be a combination of thick skin and hair that is moving up and down, William??
Click to expand...

Because bone is moving, not skin.

Patty's cheekbone becomes lit-up by the sunlight in Frame 348, LT. Therefore...the direct sunlight could very well also be shining in her eyes.

Hence...the lowering of her eyebrow.
Click to expand...

You have it backwards. The browridge bone rises when hit by the sunlight.

Why did she do that, Sweaty?
 
Sweaty, for the moment just ignore the clown picture. I have a question for you...

The two Patty pics are the two frames of your "sun becomes too bright for her" animated gif.

Which one is when Patty is all fine and normal, and which one is when the sun hits her eyes and she drops her brows (as you say)???


bisrt.png
 
William Parcher said:
Sweaty, for the moment just ignore the clown picture. I have a question for you...

The two Patty pics are the two frames of your "sun becomes too bright for her" animated gif.

Which one is when Patty is all fine and normal, and which one is when the sun hits her eyes and she drops her brows (as you say)???


[qimg]http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w310/william_parcher/bisrt.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...


I'm just impressed by the way not just her eyebrows, but her ENTIRE HEAD, gets 3 inches taller. That Patty is a magical creature for sure.....
 
comment 2834, at the BFF.

Two guys in patio chairs on a porch swing, under a helicopter, at Bluff Creek in the winter? what could POSSIBLY go wrong?

And for what?

Someone needs to take a step back here. Boobology foolishness is one thing, but this is quite another.
 
Dang parn. That does seem a wee bit overzealous. Couldn't they do it on the ground a hell of a lot easier? Seems like a lot of error in your position as well might be possible depending on how your data collection is done.

Just seems like a weird and possibly dangerous way (expensive?) to go about gathering that data set. ..... especially considering the circumstances and results. (45 year old film sight near a creek bed for a hoax) Sure makes for dramatic TV though......
 
Last edited:
William Parcher said:
Because bone is moving, not skin.
Click to expand...


In the video I posted of the dog moving it's eyebrows...is part of the dog's skull moving, also?

Also...what do you think is the likelihood that a 'suit mask' would show that degree of 'eyebrow movement'?


You have it backwards. The browridge bone rises when hit by the sunlight.

Why did she do that, Sweaty?
Click to expand...
That is incorrect, William.

Frame 348 is the first, or second Frame which shows direct sunlight lighting-up the cheekbone...(as Patty is turning to look back at Roger)....and the eyebrow appears lower in that Frame, than it does in the surrounding Frames.


Edited to add:

Cryptomundo has a new, short article about the Patterson Film....and included a 2-Frame 'mouth movement' animation of mine, that I had sent to Loren last year...

http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/data-p-g/


Those two Frames are the start of Patty's turning her head away from Roger...and, opening her jaw somewhat. Quite possibly...a soft vocalization directed at Roger, as she was turning away from him.

Patty shows apparent eyebrow movement...and apparent jaw/mouth movement....just like a real, live animal. :)
 
Last edited:
parnassus said:
comment 2834, at the BFF.

Two guys in patio chairs on a porch swing, under a helicopter, at Bluff Creek in the winter? what could POSSIBLY go wrong?

And for what?

Someone needs to take a step back here. Boobology foolishness is one thing, but this is quite another.
Click to expand...

I agree. I mean we all know that female sasquatches have much less defined eyebrows than males and that they groom them for each other on tuesdays ! Or in some cases like in New Jersey on Thursday afternoon.. so..
 
SweatyYeti said:
Those two Frames are the start of Patty's turning her head away from Roger...and, opening her jaw somewhat. Quite possibly...a soft vocalization directed at Roger, as she was turning away from him.
Click to expand...

And she's saying . . . .

"Actually I'm a guy in a suit."
 
SweatyYeti said:
Cryptomundo has a new, short article about the Patterson Film....and included a 2-Frame 'mouth movement' animation of mine, that I had sent to Loren last year...
Click to expand...

Do you have any animations showing a clear and continuous movement for longer than a frame or two? Or is Patty so twitchy that her facial movements only last for a fraction of a second?
 
I thought it was " Do you have it Roger ?" At that point he gave him a thumbs up and smacked the horse and well.. the rest is for the next 100 years or so it appears.

Of course in 100 years people will be arguing on some sort of a site about the merits of Pokemon.
 
parnassus said:
comment 2834, at the BFF.

Two guys in patio chairs on a porch swing, under a helicopter, at Bluff Creek in the winter? what could POSSIBLY go wrong?

And for what?

Someone needs to take a step back here. Boobology foolishness is one thing, but this is quite another.
Click to expand...

Boobfootery aside that is just about the stupidest idea one could think up, better stick with the balloon gadget, at least that has less potential to get people killed.
 
Slocie's said:
Boobfootery aside that is just about the stupidest idea one could think up, better stick with the balloon gadget, at least that has less potential to get people killed.
Click to expand...
Don't worry for their safety, they will certainly have the idea of bringing parachutes or umbrellas, or something like that.
 

Attachments

  • UmbrellaParachute_Bridgeman.jpg
    UmbrellaParachute_Bridgeman.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Kilaak Kommander said:
Do you have any animations showing a clear and continuous movement for longer than a frame or two? Or is Patty so twitchy that her facial movements only last for a fraction of a second?
Click to expand...


For the most part, Kilaak...Patty's mouth movements last for about 2-3 Frames of the Film.

Here are 3 Frames...the two in the animation on Cryptomundo's site....with the next consecutive Frame added....(Frames F370-F372).....first Patty's jaw lowers, and then her mouth/lips project forward...

C8F370-372MouthAG2Small.gif
 
Last edited:
it's all scam, you are wasting our time, please stop with the dadburn frames over and over and over. THERE IS NOTHING TO SEE THERE!!!!
 
This may be a silly question, but what was the frame rate of the PGF?
How much time passes to allow for the alleged movements of the face? And muscles for that matter?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom