• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cylindrical UFO videotaped by Kentucky Amateur Astronomer

Yep, looks like clear plastic bag of some sort.

How does the guy know what altitude it was at if it was a perfectly clear sky with no other objects around it to guage the distance? I think it's a well established fact that humans suck at being able to actually tell how far away or close something is in those conditions...
 
Yep, looks like clear plastic bag of some sort.

How does the guy know what altitude it was at if it was a perfectly clear sky with no other objects around it to guage the distance? I think it's a well established fact that humans suck at being able to actually tell how far away or close something is in those conditions...

This is what I was going to say.

He added that his sighting "was with clear, cloudless skies, no aircraft in sight, altitude unknown but definitely above airliner cruising altitude."

That is just nonsensical.

I wonder if this isn't another of those videos filming the reflection of a light bulb, florescent in this case, through a window?
 
"...if it's a balloon, how could it maintain its structure at that altitude?"

He's not aware of how high even a toy latex party balloon filled with helium can go before bursting?

2000 to 6000 meters.

Or.

10 km.

Depends on who you ask and how much helium the balloon has in it. But I think that "pretty high up" would just about cover it, much higher up than what he's got there.

If you assume that you're looking at a balloon at 1000 meters, and not an alien spacecraft at 10 km, that is.
 
Yep, looks like clear plastic bag of some sort.

How does the guy know what altitude it was at if it was a perfectly clear sky with no other objects around it to guage the distance? I think it's a well established fact that humans suck at being able to actually tell how far away or close something is in those conditions...

Yes, I wondered that too. I think it is too easy for a brain to say, "hmm.. looks kind of like the size of an airplane contrail, therefore it must be at the altitude of contrails" or some similar not very good logic.
 
He added that his sighting "was with clear, cloudless skies, no aircraft in sight, altitude unknown but definitely above airliner cruising altitude."
"I don't know what it was, how big it was or how high up it was, but it was definitely this high up." Moron.
 
Oh dear! I found this in the comments.

Does anyone know how he could possibly have known it was "above airliner cruising altitude" if there was nothing else to measure against?

The response is,

He probably figured that since he had to use a telescope to video the object it was pretty high up. The article didn't say how powerful his telescope was, so it's left up to him to determine the height. I'm not going to question his judgement.

What about the size of the object?
 
I wonder if this isn't another of those videos filming the reflection of a light bulb, florescent in this case, through a window?

When I first saw it, I thought the same thing. But the article said "Several eyewitnesses in different areas of eastern Kentucky reported seeing a strange, cylindrical UFO hover for two hours in clear skies last week,.. "

so, I don't think it's possible for several people in different areas to see the same light bulb reflection or lens flare.
 
When I first saw it, I thought the same thing. But the article said "Several eyewitnesses in different areas of eastern Kentucky reported seeing a strange, cylindrical UFO hover for two hours in clear skies last week,.. "

so, I don't think it's possible for several people in different areas to see the same light bulb reflection or lens flare.

But it is possible for someone to hear these claims and then hoax a similar video.

Can we say for certain this was filmed at the same time as the other reports?
 
Definitely aliens. Invisible aliens, with invisible propulsion technology, invisible means of life support, invisible decks, invisible bulkheads, invisible weaponry, invisible observation equipment, and a transparent but somewhat reflective hull that resembles an inflated plastic hot dog.

Definitely.
 
Last edited:
But it is possible for someone to hear these claims and then hoax a similar video.

Can we say for certain this was filmed at the same time as the other reports?

Good point Biscuit. It could be a hoax.

I tend to lean toward Akhenaten's balloon explanation, though. That does seem to look quite similar. Before seeing that video, I was just thinking it was some semi deflated weather balloon, sort of like the one pictured here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/1583094...t/t/warming-experts-stick-their-heads-clouds/
 
This is a still taken from the video I linked earlier with an inset of the object in the OP.


SolarBalloon.jpg
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom