• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The crucifixion of Jesus Christ

... the August 17 crucifixion of Jesus which I myself have proven to be true and correct.

No. You have not proven this. You keep claiming you have proven it, but every time you try to explain how, you merely return to a handwaving circular argument which relies on quoting your proven-to-be-false prophet.

If you have a proof which does not require anyone to believe anything 'Ka Apaz' says, then by all means let's have it.
 
Ama said that it is easier for man to accept what is wrong than what is correct, like the August 17 crucifixion of Jesus which I myself have proven to be true and correct.
Based on a search of this thread, you have mentioned "August 17" 53 times in this thread. Could you please find it in your soul to quit beating this dead horse?
 
I should like to point out that I have just returned from dinner and a long walk after. As it happens, I passed 221B Baker Street on my way back to my hotel on Edgeware Road. Parked in front was an Aston Martin Virage, which proves two things: not only does Sherlock Holmes exist, he shares the same taste in cars as me!
 
I should like to point out that I have just returned from dinner and a long walk after. As it happens, I passed 221B Baker Street on my way back to my hotel on Edgeware Road. Parked in front was an Aston Martin Virage, which proves two things: not only does Sherlock Holmes exist, he shares the same taste in cars as me!
your logic is flawed: it could be that james bond was paying a visit to holmes, or that holmes is in the body of james bond. the only thing that we can be sure of is certainly that the two cited above exist for real.
 
Ama said that it is easier for man to accept what is wrong than what is correct, like the August 17 crucifixion of Jesus which I myself have proven to be true and correct.

But it's a rather unsatisfactory form of proof for most of us. The "proof" is that Ama told you it was true.

However, you have some very, very, odd statements, some of which are demonstrably false, but which seem connected to this date.

I understand that there is modern day divine revelation involved with God telling Ama all sorts of things, but surely you are close enough to mainstream Christianity to accept that the Bible is sort of the granddaddy of all divine revelations, and that further revelation may complete what is told in the Bible, but not contradict it.

Given that, it's very hard to reconcile any calendrical claims that put Passover and Rosh Hashanah so close together. Leviticus 23 says that Passover is in the first month, and Rosh Hashanah et al are in the seventh month. It would be very odd, and very un-Jewish, if the Jews were to have set the date of one of those holidays based on one calendar, and the other based on a different calendar.

Furthermore, you assert that the date of Passover was fixed in Nisan only during the calendar reform of 358 AD. However, the Mishnah places it in Nisan, and that set of works was completed no later than AD 200. I would be very surprised to learn that it was ever in any month other than Nisan, ever, but I must admit that the only definitive documents I could find were in the Torah, and they all said "the first month". The Mishnah have generally been accepted as being written during the period of 200 BC to 200 AD, so it is conceivable that the date of Passover was not fixed in Nisan until after the time of Christ, but I think you will find no source outside of divine revelation via Ama that agrees witht that idea.

Purim, on the other hand, is an entirely different matter. It is now and always has been in the month of Adar. This is established firmly in the Bible itself, in the Book of Esther. Of that, there can be no doubt unless you assert that the Bible is just plain wrong. If you were to make such an assertion, I'm sure you would find much support for it here, but it might undermine your other positions.

Finally Dedication (Hanukkah) appears to always have been on 25th Kislev. I say "appears" because there is some tiny bit of wiggle room on that point. The festival is only known from the time of the Maccabees, and at that time it was fixed at 25 Kislev. You have asserted that there was an earlier festival that celebrates the original dedication of the first temple. There's no documentary evidence for this that I am aware of, but perhaps Ama has said it is so? Who am I to argue with a prophet of such standing?

In summary, many of your calendrical assertions appear to be in direct contradiction to the Bible. Given that, I think you would find it difficult to convince Christians that Ama could possibly have given a more accurate version of the various timelines than the widely accepted version of events.
 
Last edited:
So I have to scrutinize what have been presented.

You keep repeating again and again that you have carefully scrutinized what "Ama" told you in order to separate the logical and good from the bad or evil, and reject the latter. But can you tell us whether you have rejected even ONE thing as evil or incorrect or illogical from what "Ama" has told you over all these years? If so, what was it?

Since you've been posting here, it's clear you don't reject even plainly failed predictions. If even those, absurd to most if not all other observers here, aren't illogical to you, has there been anything else you've rejected? If not, how can we take your claim of careful scrutiny seriously?
 
Last edited:
... There are those that I find logically correct that I accept them as true and which you and the others claim to be “utterly ridiculous”. ...

PC, I understand you believe that via these seances your medium has channeled Jesus.

But seriously, Pontius PIlate was a golem?
5,455 lashes?
Passover isn't celebrated the fist full moon after the Spring Equinox?

@pakeha, #241

I just found on page 153 in “Pasiong Mahal” the following:
1. That Simon of Cyrene was hired to carry the cross;
2. That Simon of Cyrene was the father of Alexander and Rufa (Mark 15:21); and
3. That Alexander and Rufa were disciples of Jesus (page 153, “Pasiong Mahal”)

If Alexander and Rufa were disciples of Jesus and their father was Simon of Cyrene, then I maybe correct in saying that Simon of Cyrene “must have visited some relatives”. I do not know why Simon was in Cyrene (migrant worker?), or if he was a native of Cyrene, his children Alexander and Rufa must have moved to Jerusalem.

Why were the names of Alexander and Rufa in the Holy Bible? The book “Pasiong Mahal” answers that and tells us that they were disciples of Jesus.

Thanks for the information, PC.
I find your reliance on the "Pasiong" as a source of information charming and I've certainly learned a great deal from investigating those claims.
I'll be back after I heave several casks of mead into the sea for those who deserve them.

ETA:
It's Rufus, not Rufa, by the way.
 
Last edited:
@Pixel42, #255

The reason why I present to you what I heard and learned from the spirit of Ama is to get the other side of the story.


The other side of a bronze age fairytale is still a bronze age fairytale. The only difference is that the story we're more familiar with from the Bible at least had a few bits and pieces in it that were marginally believable, something that your bizarre tale seems to have dispensed with completely.


It will be me who makes the final decision whether to accept it or not. There are those that I find logically correct that I accept them as true and which you and the others claim to be “utterly ridiculous”.


What about the things that you admit that you find yourself to be utterly ridiculous?


@Blue Mountain, #242

Yes, Blue Mountain, 5,455 lashes is “utterly ridiculous” but that is what I heard in several sessions and I am sharing this info to you.

Being utterly ridiculous is apparently no barrier to your belief in this nonsense.


Ama said that it is easier for man to accept what is wrong than what is correct, like the August 17 crucifixion of Jesus which I myself have proven to be true and correct.


Whatever your spook has to say about it, you've proven nothing whatsoever.


So I cannot totally ignore the spirit of Ama as many of you suggested.


Not even partially. If the old crone told you that you could grow chooks by planting feathers you'd do it and then profess bewilderment that it didn't work.


I am responsible for my soul where I want it to live in the hereafter. So I have to scrutinize what have been presented.


Well, the good news is that you don't have a soul and there's no hereafter. The bad news of course is that you appear to have wasted a good part of your life in pursuit of a fantasy, but it's too late now to be worried about that.

It might be nice to think you could come to your senses and enjoy what little time is left to you without this delusion, but alas! It ain't going to happen, is it?
 
@pakeha, #241

I just found on page 153 in “Pasiong Mahal” the following:
1. That Simon of Cyrene was hired to carry the cross;


That's not what it says in the Bible.


2. That Simon of Cyrene was the father of Alexander and Rufa (Mark 15:21);


That's not what it says in the Bible either.


and
3. That Alexander and Rufa were disciples of Jesus (page 153, “Pasiong Mahal”)


And where, pray tell, did the author of that illustrious work get this information from?


If Alexander and Rufa were disciples of Jesus and their father was Simon of Cyrene, then I maybe correct in saying that Simon of Cyrene “must have visited some relatives”. I do not know why Simon was in Cyrene (migrant worker?), or if he was a native of Cyrene, his children Alexander and Rufa must have moved to Jerusalem.


I'm pretty sure I've spotted a couple of problems.


Why were the names of Alexander and Rufa in the Holy Bible?


They aren't.


The book “Pasiong Mahal” answers that and tells us that they were disciples of Jesus.


And "The Hobbit" tells us that Gandalf was a wizard and that Smaug was a dragon. This is not only at least as believable as your story, it's just as relevant and a damned sight more interesting.
 
Do you know where Golgotha or Calvary
was where Jesus was crucified?


No, and neither do you and neither does anyone else.


It says in John 19:21-22, “Now in the place where he was crucified there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulcher, wherein was never man yet laid. There laid they Jesus therefore because of the Jews’ preparation day; for the sepulcher was nigh at hand.”


No it doesn't.

John 19:21-22 says:

21Then said the chief priests of the Jews to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews; but that he said, I am King of the Jews.

22Pilate answered, What I have written I have written.
and even if you weren't out by 20 verses, the description of the sepulchre is completely at odds with actual burial practices at that time and place.

The idea of a conveniently located, dual-purpose garden in which the Romans were crucifying miscreants and the Jews were burying their well-to-do dead is ludicrous.

Although I'll bet you have an explanation that tops it.


I would like to answer your other points but we will be off-track.


Why worry? We're already off the bloody planet.
 
Last edited:
Obviously, God created a special sort of tree with exactly these dimensions, to make it easier for the Romans to kill His son, and then magicked it away so that there was no inconvenient evidence floating around.

I have researched this and found it to be logically correct.

D'oh! For some strange reason that didn't occur to me.
 
Did you know that Quercus crucifera is an oak species with only two branches that form a cross with the trunk? Ka Apaz confirmed it, they have no leaves and are only 7ft tall, just enough to pin down on it a 6'8" godly guy

Thanks. If Ka Apaz confirmed it, then it definitely doesn't exist.
 
Oh no - not more nails?

Of course more nails. How many "true nails of the cross" have been found? 10? 20? 50? Easilly enough to nail the cross together and then nail him to it.

Unless, of course, the Romans invented flatpack furniture and the cross came as a kit of parts, with blurred diagrams, badly translated instructions and a few spare nails.

:D
 
But it's a rather unsatisfactory form of proof for most of us. The "proof" is that Ama told you it was true.

However, you have some very, very, odd statements, some of which are demonstrably false, but which seem connected to this date.

I understand that there is modern day divine revelation involved with God telling Ama all sorts of things, but surely you are close enough to mainstream Christianity to accept that the Bible is sort of the granddaddy of all divine revelations, and that further revelation may complete what is told in the Bible, but not contradict it.

Given that, it's very hard to reconcile any calendrical claims that put Passover and Rosh Hashanah so close together. Leviticus 23 says that Passover is in the first month, and Rosh Hashanah et al are in the seventh month. It would be very odd, and very un-Jewish, if the Jews were to have set the date of one of those holidays based on one calendar, and the other based on a different calendar.

Furthermore, you assert that the date of Passover was fixed in Nisan only during the calendar reform of 358 AD. However, the Mishnah places it in Nisan, and that set of works was completed no later than AD 200. I would be very surprised to learn that it was ever in any month other than Nisan, ever, but I must admit that the only definitive documents I could find were in the Torah, and they all said "the first month". The Mishnah have generally been accepted as being written during the period of 200 BC to 200 AD, so it is conceivable that the date of Passover was not fixed in Nisan until after the time of Christ, but I think you will find no source outside of divine revelation via Ama that agrees witht that idea.

Purim, on the other hand, is an entirely different matter. It is now and always has been in the month of Adar. This is established firmly in the Bible itself, in the Book of Esther. Of that, there can be no doubt unless you assert that the Bible is just plain wrong. If you were to make such an assertion, I'm sure you would find much support for it here, but it might undermine your other positions.

Finally Dedication (Hanukkah) appears to always have been on 25th Kislev. I say "appears" because there is some tiny bit of wiggle room on that point. The festival is only known from the time of the Maccabees, and at that time it was fixed at 25 Kislev. You have asserted that there was an earlier festival that celebrates the original dedication of the first temple. There's no documentary evidence for this that I am aware of, but perhaps Ama has said it is so? Who am I to argue with a prophet of such standing?

In summary, many of your calendrical assertions appear to be in direct contradiction to the Bible. Given that, I think you would find it difficult to convince Christians that Ama could possibly have given a more accurate version of the various timelines than the widely accepted version of events.


@Meadmaker, #285

Ama just gave the August 17 crucifixion and May 23 birth dates, without year, to older listeners. I learned about them in 1983 when I first went to the session hall in Metro Manila. It was only in 1999 when we connected to the Internet that I checked if there is any ring of truth in them.

Yes, Meadmaker, the August 17 crucifixion date is odd because since I was a child, we have been observing the crucifixion of Jesus on Good Friday sometime in March or April, but not in August. In my study from 1999 to 2003, I mainly used the Holy Bible.

The Holy Bible is not only the “granddaddy of all divine revelations” but it is the only one that came from the only true God.

As I said, the Israelites were using two kinds of calendars when Jesus was crucified. Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and Feast of the Dedication were in the purely lunar calendar, whereas Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, and Sukkoth were in the lunisolar calendar.

Actually, during the lifetime of Jesus from 33 BC to 1 BC, the years when Passover was in the month of Tishri (the seventh month) were in 8 BC, 7 BC, and 6 BC.

Did you know that the Egyptians used at least two calendars: a civil solar calendar and a religious lunar calendar? They did not use any lunisolar calendar.

The Israelites learned only about the lunisolar calendar from the Babylonians during their exile in Babylon in the seventh century BC. From Encyclopaedia Britannica, Volume 15, page 465, column 2: “There is no reference to the New Year’s day in the Bible. After the conquest of Jerusalem (587 BC), the Babylonians introduced their cyclic calendar and the reckoning of their regnal years from Nisanu 1, about the spring equinox. The Jews now had a finite calendar year with a New Year’s day, and they adopted the Babylonian month names, which they continue to use.”

Later, when we discuss the nativity of Jesus, we will touch on Purim.

The Feast of the Dedication was in the lunar calendar. It was celebrated on the 15th day of the seventh month. Prior to the crucifixion of Jesus, it was held on the following dates: Adar 15, 3757 (March 11, 4 BC), Adar 15, 3758 (March 1, 3 BC), Adar 15, 3759 (February 19, 2 BC), and Shevat 15, 3760 (February 8, 1 BC). John 10:22-23 state: “And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter. And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon’s porch.” This happened on February 8, 1 BC.
 
PC, I understand you believe that via these seances your medium has channeled Jesus.

But seriously, Pontius PIlate was a golem?
5,455 lashes?
Passover isn't celebrated the fist full moon after the Spring Equinox?


Thanks for the information, PC.
I find your reliance on the "Pasiong" as a source of information charming and I've certainly learned a great deal from investigating those claims.
I'll be back after I heave several casks of mead into the sea for those who deserve them.

ETA:
It's Rufus, not Rufa, by the way.


@pakeha, #287

Thank you, pakeha, for your correction. Yes, in Mark 15:21 of the King James Version (KJV) of the Holy Bible, the names of the children of Simon of Cyrene are Alexander and Rufus. On page 153 of the “Pasiong Mahal”, they are Alejandro and Rufo. Not Rufa.

Ama recommended that we use the KJV and “Awit at Salaysay ng Pasiong Mahal ni Hesukristong Panginoon Natin” (Song and Narration of the Holy Passion of our Lord Jesus Christ) or “Pasiong Mahal” or “Pasyon” for short. The latter book in Filipino is mainly about the crucifixion of Jesus. It is more detailed than those found in the Bible.

Ama told us that when Jesus was twelve years old, He created Pontius Pilate from clay called “pila” who was exactly like Him to be adopted by the Roman Emperor Tiberius Caesar. That is why he was called Pilato or “pila ito” (this is pila). We know that Pontius Pilate was the Prefect of Judea who ordered the crucifixion of Jesus. Why?

Ama revealed that Jesus received 5,455 lashes. Incredible. That is why the three kilometer route to the crucifixion site took them three days to negotiate, aided by Simon of Cyrene of the third day.

I found in my study that Jesus was crucified after the Passover Festival (Pesach) on August 17, 1 BC (proleptic Gregorian calendar), a summer’s day, equivalent to Av 30, 3760 (Jewish calendar). It could not be in spring but in summer based on three accounts in the Bible (http://aristean.org/wp110.htm titled “Bible stories indicate crucifixion in summer”). I found the third account only recently.
 
Unless, of course, the Romans invented flatpack furniture and the cross came as a kit of parts, with blurred diagrams, badly translated instructions and a few spare nails.

:D

And, of course, "a totally unidentifiable little metal object with flanges at both ends and a sort of ridge and a sort of a hole for a screw."
THGTG, vol iii

...Ama told us that when Jesus was twelve years old, He created Pontius Pilate from clay called “pila” who was exactly like Him to be adopted by the Roman Emperor Tiberius Caesar. That is why he was called Pilato or “pila ito” (this is pila). We know that Pontius Pilate was the Prefect of Judea who ordered the crucifixion of Jesus. Why?...

PC, do you really believe this?
 
@pakeha, #287

Thank you, pakeha, for your correction. Yes, in Mark 15:21 of the King James Version (KJV) of the Holy Bible, the names of the children of Simon of Cyrene are Alexander and Rufus. On page 153 of the “Pasiong Mahal”, they are Alejandro and Rufo. Not Rufa.


Whatever their bloody names are, so what?


Ama recommended that we use the KJV and “Awit at Salaysay ng Pasiong Mahal ni Hesukristong Panginoon Natin” (Song and Narration of the Holy Passion of our Lord Jesus Christ) or “Pasiong Mahal” or “Pasyon” for short. The latter book in Filipino is mainly about the crucifixion of Jesus.


Because 17th century English and Tagalog go together so well that there could never possibly be any conflicts or misunderstandings.


It is more detailed than those found in the Bible.


So are the ridiculous stories that you tell but when the additional details have the appearance of being added solely to make the tale become more and more outrageously unlikely they don't actually add any value.


Ama told us that when Jesus was twelve years old, He created Pontius Pilate from clay called “pila” who was exactly like Him to be adopted by the Roman Emperor Tiberius Caesar. That is why he was called Pilato or “pila ito” (this is pila). We know that Pontius Pilate was the Prefect of Judea who ordered the crucifixion of Jesus. Why?


Drivel.


Ama revealed that Jesus received 5,455 lashes. Incredible.


Exactly. And yet you lap it up.


That is why the three kilometer route to the crucifixion site took them three days to negotiate, aided by Simon of Cyrene of the third day.


Rubbish. My studies have revealed that it was 17 kilometres but it only took 20 minutes because Simon had brought his truck over from Cyrene at the request of the Officer in Charge of Crucifixions, Domicus O'Reillicus.


I found in my study that Jesus was crucified after the Passover Festival (Pesach) on August 17, 1 BC (proleptic Gregorian calendar), a summer’s day, equivalent to Av 30, 3760 (Jewish calendar). It could not be in spring but in summer based on three accounts in the Bible (http://aristean.org/wp110.htm titled “Bible stories indicate crucifixion in summer”).


No, you've clearly forgotten to carry the one and then take away the number you first thought of.

Common mistake.


I found the third account only recently.


Of course you did. In a box of corn flakes, was it?
 
Last edited:
@Meadmaker, #285

Ama just gave the August 17 crucifixion and May 23 birth dates, without year, to older listeners. I learned about them in 1983 when I first went to the session hall in Metro Manila. It was only in 1999 when we connected to the Internet that I checked if there is any ring of truth in them.

Yes, Meadmaker, the August 17 crucifixion date is odd because since I was a child, we have been observing the crucifixion of Jesus on Good Friday sometime in March or April, but not in August. In my study from 1999 to 2003, I mainly used the Holy Bible.
The currently celebrated dates were deliberately chosen to rival various pagan festivals by the early christian church, so as better to supplant those earlier pagan beliefs. It matters not what ill justified dates you imagine.

The Holy Bible is not only the “granddaddy of all divine revelations” but it is the only one that came from the only true God.
You do not believe this at all. You believe Ama trumps the bible.
You are what is described in the bible as a heretic.

As I said, the Israelites were using two kinds of calendars when Jesus was crucified. Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and Feast of the Dedication were in the purely lunar calendar, whereas Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, and Sukkoth were in the lunisolar calendar.
You got the date wrong by 33 years, so no.

Actually, during the lifetime of Jesus from 33 BC to 1 BC, the years when Passover was in the month of Tishri (the seventh month) were in 8 BC, 7 BC, and 6 BC.
What months did you omit again?

Did you know that the Egyptians used at least two calendars: a civil solar calendar and a religious lunar calendar? They did not use any lunisolar calendar.
Good for them. Relevance?


The Israelites learned only about the lunisolar calendar from the Babylonians during their exile in Babylon in the seventh century BC. From Encyclopaedia Britannica, Volume 15, page 465, column 2: “There is no reference to the New Year’s day in the Bible. After the conquest of Jerusalem (587 BC), the Babylonians introduced their cyclic calendar and the reckoning of their regnal years from Nisanu 1, about the spring equinox. The Jews now had a finite calendar year with a New Year’s day, and they adopted the Babylonian month names, which they continue to use.”
Relevance?

Later, when we discuss the nativity of Jesus, we will touch on Purim.
The account that the gospels cannot agree on? That will be fun.

The Feast of the Dedication was in the lunar calendar. It was celebrated on the 15th day of the seventh month. Prior to the crucifixion of Jesus, it was held on the following dates: Adar 15, 3757 (March 11, 4 BC), Adar 15, 3758 (March 1, 3 BC), Adar 15, 3759 (February 19, 2 BC), and Shevat 15, 3760 (February 8, 1 BC). John 10:22-23 state: “And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter. And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon’s porch.” This happened on February 8, 1 BC.
Many claims, no evidence.
 
The Holy Bible is not only the “granddaddy of all divine revelations” but it is the only one that came from the only true God.

If this were so, Aristeo, you have with these very words asserted that every single word Ama/Ka Apaz has uttered can not possibly be from "the only true god."

You have painted yourself into a corner from which there is no escape. Every time you quote Ama/Ka Apaz, you slander "the one true god" by associating it with a mendacious fraud artist who takes advantage of gullible people.

If you believe that you have a soul, and that this soul can be jeopardized by not discarding what is evil, you have a lot of 'splaining to do.

Later, when we discuss the nativity of Jesus, we will touch on Purim.

Nothing to discuss, Aristeo. If there was a Jesus, he was born and is now dead. Dead people don't come back to life, no matter what your book of myths says on the matter. Purim is a Jewish holiday that's still being celebrated, but Jesus isn't around to play with dreidels any more.
 
@Meadmaker, #285
The Holy Bible is not only the “granddaddy of all divine revelations” but it is the only one that came from the only true God.

Keep that in mind.

As I said, the Israelites were using two kinds of calendars when Jesus was crucified. Passover, the Feast of Unleavened Bread, and Feast of the Dedication were in the purely lunar calendar, whereas Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, and Sukkoth were in the lunisolar calendar.

But this directly contradicts the instructions given by God to the Israelites in Leviticus 23. At the time of Leviticus 23, God directed them to celebrate Pasover and Feast of Unleavened Bread in the first month, and Rosh Hashanah (I think it was called the Feast of Trumpets, but I'm not sure) Yom Kippur and Sukkoth in the seventh month.

How did those holidays end up in two separate calendars?

Is there any source for this bizarre switching of half of the holidays into a new calendar? Does Ama have any backup?


Later, when we discuss the nativity of Jesus, we will touch on Purim.

Well, when you do, you had best discuss it as being in Adar, because the Bible says it's in Adar, and it says so by name. The first one was in Adar, and every one after has been in Adar. That's not some calendar reform. That's straight from the One True God.

The Feast of the Dedication was in the lunar calendar.

Again, is there a source other than Ama? All of the writings say 25th Kislev. Those writings aren't in the Bible (unless you are Catholic), so we'll assume they weren't inerrant, but all the avaible evidence from any source other than Ama says that it's 25th Kislev, which would make it lunisolar.

This in no way contradicts John 10: 22-23. All he says is that it was "in winter". Last time I checked it was cold in Kislev.
 

Back
Top Bottom