Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
mikeyman said:
From Rob Menard`s Face Book page today: :)

Robert Menard

about an hour ago.



Tonight we make history! A bunch of us are going to a restaurant and with the consent of the owner, will be signing for our meals using the CONSUMER PURCHASE rights expressed in the Bills of Exchange Act. If it works, we are styling!


.facebook.com/robert.menard.52

Put the usual at the front of the url


A success ?:D
Click to expand...

Please can you explain what "Put the usual at the front of the url"
means? I can't find anything.

Thanks
 
Yep tried that but just get
"The page you requested was not found
You may have clicked an expired link or mistyped the address. Some web addresses are case sensitive.
Return home
Go back to the previous page"

Is it cos I'm the UK, maybe?
 
Oh dear and I thought we getting on so well, but now I'm not even a friend. And he's such a charmer with us girls, if I'd been in that Windsor bar, I'd have been all over him :boggled:
 
if I'd been in that Windsor bar, I'd have been all over him
Click to expand...

icon_vomit.gif
 
BritPunk said:
Oh dear and I thought we getting on so well, but now I'm not even a friend. And he's such a charmer with us girls, if I'd been in that Windsor bar, I'd have been all over him :boggled:
Click to expand...

And his camera would have been all over your chest.
 
The Rooke decision makes mention of the consumer purchases scheme having already been tried and failed:

2. Bill Consumer Purchases

[544] Recently the Ontario Court of Appeal has, in Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Di Iorio, 2011
ONCA 792 a paras. 2-3, rejected what seems to be a new ‘money for nothing’ scheme, where the
applicants claimed that documents called “Bill-Consumer Purchases” would discharge a debt:

2 The appellants contend that the motion judge erred by not accepting that
the documents they submitted to the respondent, namely, so-called
"Bill-Consumer Purchases" were legal tender for their debts.

3 We disagree. The appellants' documents have no commercial value
whatsoever. Accordingly, the appellants' debts to T-D Bank remain
unpaid.

[545] The trial judgment is not reported, and the Court of Appeal offers little detail on the
theoretical basis of this scheme. My assumption is that this concept in some manner relates to the
“consumer bills and notes” component of the Bills of Exchange Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-4, ss. 188-
192.
Click to expand...
 
BritPunk said:
Please can you explain what "Put the usual at the front of the url"
means? I can't find anything.

Thanks
Click to expand...

Hi. The Face Book page is still there.

No mention yet of THE BIG SUCCESS :jaw-dropp
Maybe Rob hopes it`s all been forgotten.

Lots of other postings though !
 
It's hilarious that he thinks either of those make him look like someone you would take seriously.
 
So this is a "chilish dare beneath a proper judge":

[674] If you believe what you teach is true, then do not encourage others to be the ones to execute those concepts in the courts. Present your ideas and concepts yourselves. You will get a fair hearing, and as detailed a response as your ideas warrant. The caselaw cited in these Reasons make that very clear. Canadian courts will hear you and will consider whether what you claim is or is not correct.
Click to expand...

Obviously a "proper judge" would know better than to ask you to present a legal argument in court.
 
Stacey Grove said:
So this is a "chilish dare beneath a proper judge":



Obviously a "proper judge" would know better than to ask you to present a legal argument in court.
Click to expand...

Well, Rob knows he's safe so long as he stays on YouTube. The real world demands that things work, so as long as he stays away from that his pretty sounding tripe doesn't have to be proven.

Looking at Rob's studio he's not able to tap into the "consumer purchase" bit for his place.
 
Menard bites back -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFNiY...layer_embedded

I love this reply:-
"Mr.Menard, Great video sir.
I really wish you would build a school already !
I would gladly pay to attend.
Good luck with this fellow. He has attacked you out of fear.
Lowfun 5 hours ago"

There really is one born every minute.
Click to expand...

Nice subliminal message with the hunting knife Rob, that may get a reaction from the Police.

As for the comment to his video above, that will be a Menard sockpuppet, a sort of stooge in the crowd as it were, all snake oil salesmen have one.
 
BritPunk said:
Menard bites back -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFNiYHlk_3E&feature=player_embedded

I love this reply:-
"Mr.Menard, Great video sir.
I really wish you would build a school already !
I would gladly pay to attend.
Good luck with this fellow. He has attacked you out of fear.
Lowfun 5 hours ago"

There really is one born every minute.
Click to expand...

I wonder who's garage he broke into to make that video.

Notice how he points to his peace offerings with a knife. :boggled:
 
Menard bites back -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFNiY...layer_embedded
Click to expand...
The most amusing part of this lunacy by Menard is that he actually seems to believe that his opinions and crackpot theories warrant an actual discussion with the judiciary to talk over the salient points.
The judgement has already explained in great detail how wrong he is yet he believes he can somehow change the judges mind.

Delusional isn't the word.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom