hgc
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2002
- Messages
- 15,892
What better describes Scientology, 100,000 pages or one, perhaps two?
Less is more.
What better describes Scientology, 100,000 pages or one, perhaps two?
So the answer is that there is no scientific studies backing any of the claims in Dianetics? Shocker.
Of course, e-meters are worthless pieces of junk. It is part of the scam. How much does the "church" charge for them? Thousands I am sure. They don't do anything. The only reason you fools think they do is because you want and expect them to. If you could actually prove that they work the way that you claim they do, you could probably win the million dollar challenge. But you don't want a million dollars, right?Is that going to be your excuse?
Go into the church and get a pinch test.
It's free.
I had a friend that tested the Emeter at grad school. He said it didn't work. He got it wrong. He just didn't know how to use it. All auditors have gotten fantastic results with it. With us it's as real as 2 + 2 = 4. I don't care how many degrees a person has, I'm not going to believe that 2 + 2 = 5. It's that simple and obvious to me. It's so obvious that it's boring to argue. The emeter works - but it isn't a lie detector.
That's nice.
Can you direct me to the scientific journals in which the papers which test the claims that L. Ron Hubbard makes in Dianetics were published, please?
If it's so simple and obvious, then explain what it does in a simple and obvious way.
Go into the church and get a pinch test.
It's free.
Could you explain just what those problems are, please?
According to his record, LRH was never wounded.
How can healing a non-existent wound be plausible?
I'm familiar with the pinch test and it is explainable in non-Scientology terms. It's similar to the tests used in the Power Band commercials.
What do you think is happening during the pinch test?
Once again:
1) The cost.
2) The regging (high pressure sales)
3) The Sec Checks (not auditing - just stealing your money for no gain)
The Sec Checks in the Church of Miscavige produce no gain. They aren't even supposed to produce gain. The church regges you for a few thousand for auditing and then uses your money to give you a session that is designed to make you feel ill.
The Freezone doesn't give Sec Checks, sells and delivers sessions at 1/10 th to 1/5th the price, does not reg (high pressure sales).
The church under Hubbard was different. At Hubbard's church a female auditor pulled my withholds so hard for so long that after a couple of hours of session she saw a meter read and said "What's that?" I had to tell her it was my erection. She asked "What's that again" and I replied "I love you". That was the end of the session. My mind was in a happy place and my face was flushed.
What do you expect? $cientology is based on a lie.
Is it possible for someone who is suspicious of the validity of your religion to skeptically try the programs out and have them function without being labeled an SP for trying to specifically seek out lies and falsifiable claims? You make it sound like only flawed people think it is a scam, and only those who are open (as in those with faith) see the benefits.Once again:
1) The cost.
2) The regging (high pressure sales)
3) The Sec Checks (not auditing - just stealing your money for no gain)
The Sec Checks in the Church of Miscavige produce no gain. They aren't even supposed to produce gain. The church regges you for a few thousand for auditing and then uses your money to give you a session that is designed to make you feel ill.
The Freezone doesn't give Sec Checks, sells and delivers sessions at 1/10 th to 1/5th the price, does not reg (high pressure sales).
The church under Hubbard was different. At Hubbard's church a female auditor pulled my withholds so hard for so long that after a couple of hours of session she saw a meter read and said "What's that?" I had to tell her it was my erection. She asked "What's that again" and I replied "I love you". That was the end of the session. My mind was in a happy place and my face was flushed.
What do you expect Dafydd? Scientology is based on a lie, so of course it would be based on a lie, so you would expect it to be based on a lie, so of course it is based on a lie. What do you expect if it's based on a lie? Of course it's based on a lie.
Is it possible for someone who is suspicious of the validity of your religion to skeptically try the programs out and have them function without being labeled an SP for trying to specifically seek out lies and falsifiable claims? You make it sound like only flawed people think it is a scam, and only those who are open (as in those with faith) see the benefits.
Go into the church and get a pinch test.
It's free.
Maybe I will. As a goodwill gesture first, could you direct me to the scientific journals in which the papers which test the claims made in Dianetics are published, please?
Is it possible for someone who is suspicious of the validity of your religion to skeptically try the programs out and have them function without being labeled an SP for trying to specifically seek out lies and falsifiable claims? You make it sound like only flawed people think it is a scam, and only those who are open (as in those with faith) see the benefits.