ponderingturtle
Orthogonal Vector
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- Messages
- 54,796
In the real world, causality is multifactorial. 'Post hoc, ergo propter hoc' is a great concept to apply to simple cause and effect, things like 'I kicked it, therefore it broke' but not so applicable to things like how much of a certain meat product sells in a certain year which depend on thousands of interrelated (and unrelated) factors. For Watson, the question is not if he's the direct cause, but rather if he can plausibly claim to be part of the cause. Since he's TRYING to be part of the cause, and there was an effect, I'm more likely to give him some credit.
So the main effect was that they can claim responsibility for the doubling of the quota, but now they don't reach it?