Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

atavisms said:
actually there were no firefighters in the building (as per FDNY Capt. whose name escapes me atm- they were pulled out at 11am) they had been told not to go in supposedly because of a broken water main -so it definitely wasn't firefighters. Besides no one would call firefighters the impersonal 'it' -we would say, 'pull them out' and LS would have nothing to do with it.
I don't get how ANYONE can look at wtc7 imploding and not see that is a controlled demolition. How could asymmetrical fires cause such a rapid symmetrical collapse? The evidence is overwhelming and more than conclusive: 9-11 = Controlled Demolitions. Sad but true.
Click to expand...

Maybe you could present some actual evidence and not just personal incredulity?

Maybe?
 
atavisms said:
Mine too.. but that is disinformation and not part of the large body of well documented facts that prove (beyond any shadow of a doubt that) wtc 1 2 & 7 were brought down with explosives.
Click to expand...

Nuh-uh. YOU'RE the disinfo. YOU'RE the secret government agent deliberately coming up with stupid conspiracy theories, in order to make real Truthers look bad.

You also beat your wife.
 
atavisms said:
actually there were no firefighters in the building (as per FDNY Capt. whose name escapes me atm- they were pulled out at 11am) they had been told not to go in supposedly because of a broken water main -so it definitely wasn't firefighters. Besides no one would call firefighters the impersonal 'it' -we would say, 'pull them out' and LS would have nothing to do with it.
Click to expand...

Go look up what Chief Nigro said about 'pull'. After all, LS was talking to an FDNY Chief, wasn't he? Does it not make sense to corroborate what LS said with someone else whose job it was to make decisions? Or not...

I don't get how ANYONE can look at wtc7 imploding and not see that is a controlled demolition. How could asymmetrical fires cause such a rapid symmetrical collapse?
Click to expand...

Your lack of understanding noted. Thanks for your input. If you don't 'get' that there were no explosions as the building fell, and that there were no explosive squibs, then you don't understand what a controlled demolition is, in real life. I don't get how ANYONE can form an intelligent opinion on the matter if you don't understand that. I really don't.

If you don't get that part, you won't get the other. That's the way understanding works - you have to master important concepts first or you'll fail. Mind you, even my cat finally figured out what a mirror was, but he didn't understand it for a while. Eventually instead of freaking out he took to admiring himself in it.

Once you understand, you will be able to relieve some of your anxiety, realizing that it was mucha do about nothing. I hope that day arrives sooner than later. My cat did it, so can you. :)

.
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
Long past time to get your squib spectacles prescription checked.
SQUIB ALERT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsJQKpnkZ10&feature=endscreen&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=972ETepp4GI&NR=1&feature=fvwp
Click to expand...

My glasses work fine, I don't see things that are not there. Try using your eyes to watch this comparison between a real CD and the collapse of WTC 7.
And remember, you can't have 'explosive squibs' without explosions, and explosions make loud booms. But that's not what happened when WTC 7 fell. So something you're claiming doesn't add up.... it's not that difficult to figure out. :)

 
alienentity said:
My glasses work fine, I don't see things that are not there. Try using your eyes to watch this comparison between a real CD and the collapse of WTC 7.
And remember, you can't have 'explosive squibs' without explosions, and explosions make loud booms. But that's not what happened when WTC 7 fell. So something you're claiming doesn't add up.... it's not that difficult to figure out. :)

Click to expand...

:dl:


Yet you can have a looks like controlled demolition, results like a controlled demolition, and faster than the ordinary controlled demolition WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES.


There were plenty of explosions reported by firemen, witnesses and TV reporters.
 
Clayton Moore said:
:dl:

Yet you can have a looks like controlled demolition, results like a controlled demolition, and faster than the ordinary controlled demolition WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES.

There were plenty of explosions reported by firemen, witnesses and TV reporters.
Click to expand...

Did you post this from 2006?

Explosions != explosives
 
Clayton method of rebuttal:

State claim --> Get debunked --> Don't admit, switch claim --> Get debunked --> Bring up old debunked claim like it's new information --> Rinse and Repeat.
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
:dl:


Yet you can have a looks like controlled demolition, results like a controlled demolition, and faster than the ordinary controlled demolition WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES.


There were plenty of explosions reported by firemen, witnesses and TV reporters.
Click to expand...

So you're saying that in some aspects it resembled a CD, in some ways it was not like a CD, therefore it was a CD?
 
000063 said:
So you're saying that in some aspects it resembled a CD, in some ways it was not like a CD, therefore it was a CD?
Click to expand...

I think Chris Mohr put it best, (referring to Gage's claim) that the world trade centers showed all the signs of a controlled demolition, except when it doesn't.
 
Clayton Moore said:
:dl:


Yet you can have a looks like controlled demolition, results like a controlled demolition, and faster than the ordinary controlled demolition WITHOUT EXPLOSIVES.


There were plenty of explosions reported by firemen, witnesses and TV reporters.
Click to expand...
Do you know what a steel frame building collapsing due to fire looks like?

Ever heard an explosion that was not caused by expolsives? Happens a lot, you know, especially when things are on fire.

Consider yourself debunked.
 
000063 said:
So you're saying that in some aspects it resembled a CD, in some ways it was not like a CD, therefore it was a CD?
Click to expand...

I'm saying it looks like, cooks like, and collapses faster than any cd I've ever seen. And


There were plenty of explosions reported by firemen, witnesses and TV reporters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom