• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

911Blogger - Fading Away?

Orphia Nay

Penguilicious Spodmaster
Tagger
Orphia Nay
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
52,463
Location
Australia
On the main page of 911Blogger the stories garner very few comments these days.

Currently, the story with the most comments has just 12 comments, and those are mostly about how few truthers there are posting replies to another story on the web. :)

Truthers, do you post at 911Blogger?

If not, why not?

Is this lack of comment a sign that 9/11 Truth is declining?
 
ozeco41 said:
The whole 9/11 thing is declining in interest.

If the trend continues I don't think I will still be posting in 40 years time.

:boxedin:
Click to expand...

D'oh! You'll have to find another hobby. Blowing up rocks with Vegemite perhaps?:duck:
 
RedIbis said:
What's a Truther?
Click to expand...

Didn't we go through this before where we decided you're only Truther who doesn't know.

911-Truther-1.jpg

TRUTHER+button+1.jpg


There's more, but you'll have to find the original post for these or you can check out the conspiracy cite www.truther.org. Good luck Truthers. Change the world and make us free.
 
Last edited:
911Blogger is practicing heavy-handed censorship.

When you sign up, you automatically get a status where your contributions must be accepted by an admin before they appear. If you don't toe the party line, your contributions are doomed.

If you have shown you're an obedient little Twoofy, always saying "wonderful, Mr. Jones" and "thank you, Mr. Ryan" and "more, more, Mr. Keogh" they might promote you such that you can post comments without delayed approval. But woe unto you if you dare to voice criticsm more than once!! Remember the responses to the Millette study (also here) or Kevin Ryan's sell-out to terrorists? Those were the most recent that generated debate with almost 100 comments. The critical participants there have since been silenced.
 
If you compare new pages with old pages then you will find that the old pages have more comments. However not all forums are reducing in size. abovetopsecret is still a bigger forum than Randi.org
 
rjh01 said:
If you compare new pages with old pages then you will find that the old pages have more comments. However not all forums are reducing in size. abovetopsecret is still a bigger forum than Randi.org
Click to expand...

Yes, but ATS and the JREF cover all sorts of topics. 911Blogger is devoted solely to the 9/11 Truth movement.
 
Actually I was invited to post there a few years ago. Then I learned they had a "screening" policy where they had to approve posts and comments before they appeared. Told them no thank you. I understand it was due to the CIT/P4T gang internet behavior. They don't want no-plane silliness to tarnish their image.

So I imagine a lot of truthers simply stay away these days because they can't express their opinions freely.
 
BCR said:
Actually I was invited to post there a few years ago. Then I learned they had a "screening" policy where they had to approve posts and comments before they appeared. Told them no thank you. I understand it was due to the CIT/P4T gang internet behavior. They don't want no-plane silliness to tarnish their image.

So I imagine a lot of truthers simply stay away these days because they can't express their opinions freely.
Click to expand...

That, and they can't agree on a cohesive story.
 
ozeco41 said:
The whole 9/11 thing is declining in interest.
Click to expand...

Which is a shame because the most important discussion the public needed to have about 9/11 never happened - and it had absolutely nothing to do with conspiracy theories.
 
dannyb said:
Which is a shame because the most important discussion the public needed to have about 9/11 never happened - and it had absolutely nothing to do with conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...
I haven't a clue what you refer to.

My own concern about the 9/11 discussion is that it has focused strongly on the big 4 (or 5) technical issues and given little effort into discussing the actions of the US Government and it's agencies. Label them "MIHOP", "LIHOP" or "LIHOOI" is you wish.

The classic example being AE911 truth which premises an alleged (alleged because I don't accept that they are genuine) -- an alleged need for a "new investigation" premised on a claim of demolition at WTC. And they started that initiative in 2007 by which time no honest person could accept CD at WTC as a viable hypothesis.

So I think the socio-political side of 9/11 conspiracies has been neglected whilst the false claims in the technical arena have taken all the focused energy.

The cynic in me says this is exactly what a Government would want. People concentrating on false technical claims which therefore will go no-where. Meanwhile no call for inquiry into political actions. That is a guaranteed "all parties' winning strategy which few politicians could resist.

So what is the aspect you think needs public discussion but "had absolutely nothing to do with conspiracy theories."?
 
dannyb said:
Which is a shame because the most important discussion the public needed to have about 9/11 never happened - and it had absolutely nothing to do with conspiracy theories.
Click to expand...

What would this discussion be about?
 
ozeco41 said:
I haven't a clue what you refer to.

My own concern about the 9/11 discussion is that it has focused strongly on the big 4 (or 5) technical issues and given little effort into discussing the actions of the US Government and it's agencies. Label them "MIHOP", "LIHOP" or "LIHOOI" is you wish.

The classic example being AE911 truth which premises an alleged (alleged because I don't accept that they are genuine) -- an alleged need for a "new investigation" premised on a claim of demolition at WTC. And they started that initiative in 2007 by which time no honest person could accept CD at WTC as a viable hypothesis.

So I think the socio-political side of 9/11 conspiracies has been neglected whilst the false claims in the technical arena have taken all the focused energy.

The cynic in me says this is exactly what a Government would want. People concentrating on false technical claims which therefore will go no-where. Meanwhile no call for inquiry into political actions. That is a guaranteed "all parties' winning strategy which few politicians could resist.

So what is the aspect you think needs public discussion but "had absolutely nothing to do with conspiracy theories."?
Click to expand...

The motive. Why did 19 men hijack planes and fly them into buildings? I know what I think; but that would be a discussion for the politics forum.
 
dannyb said:
The motive. Why did 19 men hijack planes and fly them into buildings? I know what I think; but that would be a discussion for the politics forum.
Click to expand...

I'd be interested in a discussion about that, if you'd like to explain further. Could you please start a thread in the General Politics forum, rather than let this thread get derailed? Thanks.

To re-rail, I've assumed for a long while that 911Blogger was the hub of 9/11 Truth news. If it's been superceded, by what?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom