• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

General Holocaust Denial Discussion Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's interesting that instead of going and looking for such an example yourself, you basically offload the burden of doing any hard work onto everyone else. If you think this is a valid comparison, prove it. Until then, fail.



Your link appears to have vanished, or did you just make this up?



No, the only photo that the slideshow dates is that photo. That doesn't mean the other photos are from 1942.



Fail.

Neither of the pics I highlighted are in your trio. I frankly doubt that the 'Sonderkommando' pic really is from 1942, but would note that another scan of the same photo, submitted from the Imperial War Museum to YV, says 'probably kapos', which makes sense since there are men with armbands in the picture. The entire scene does not amount to a depiction of ordinary Polish Jews, so is useless for your apparent argument.



Your wrongness regarding food economies in occupied Poland is so profound that there isn't anything to say until you show some signs of mastering the basics. Are you ever going to do that? No, thought not.



I think at this moment, the most appropriate response is 'que?'



That's your strawman.



No we're not. Freakishly small would be men below 5 foot tall.



Under-nourished, malnourished, forced to go without. Starvation = famine, which kills. Peasants go hungry in lean years, and small town dwellers who are shut off from their normal opportunities to trade and sell their wares, robbed of their communal wealth and forced to compete with others on a black market are not going to eat as much as they did in normal times.



And there's your strawman again. Look, if you say 'dwarf' then it's quite likely someone is going to think of this creature, which in fantasy-land averaged 4 feet in height. Which is waaaay under what has been discussed.

'Emaciated' is also a strawman; Belsen survivors were emaciated, and weighed quite a few kg less than the averages under discussion here. Emaciation or anorexia would be a step short of death. You can certainly find quite a few pics of emaciated Jews in the Warsaw ghetto and other localities where actual starvation broke out. They weighed even less than the averages proposed, and didn't even need to be deported because they were dying well before deportations even started.



Clearly, you haven't been following the discussion. Presumably you switched off when your comrade-in-belief started spewing out pretend quadratic equations but it seems to have escaped your notice that even Snakey accepted the Provan experiment.

Now you're backing off and trying to throw poo at it because the results don't suit your incredulity. Well, tough cookies.

Instead of simply casting doubt on everything in a vain attempt to conjure up a gotcha, please present your sourced, scientifically validated figures and tell us how it really was.

Oh wait, you never do that. Silly me.



LOL. It would take a great deal more than dumping other bodies or even coversoil to cut off the oxygen supply. The bodies weren't wrapped in polythene. Decomposition occurs in all burials. It just takes place more slowly than if a body is left above ground. Quicklime isn't some sort of bodybuilding solution which can magically prevent changes from taking place in multi-corpse layered mass graves over the course of days, weeks, months.



This isn't a 'latest one', but has been pointed out several times before. You're simply too incompetent to respond coherently to points under discussion.

It shouldn't need to be explained to someone who is supposedly familiar with this history. Belzec was the first of the AR camps. It had a smaller acreage than the other camps. When the graves were obviously overflowing, the killing stopped and the camp went over to exhuming and cremating the bodies, which was evidently deemed to be a full-time task, preventing the camp from continuing to operate. Moreover, there were other potential killing sites in close reach. Jews surviving in Lublin area could be killed at Majdanek or Sobibor, Jews in the Krakow district could be and were sent west to Auschwitz.

Treblinka and Sobibor were built later on than Belzec, and allotted more space since they were not pilot facilities like Belzec had been. They had enough space that they could continue to operate on a lower scale in 1943 while the bodies were being cremated.



And here we have Dogzilla engaging in yet more projection. It's deniers - including you - who seem to believe that you can prove something was 'impossible', therefore an event didn't happen. Nobody is arguing the converse, they are simply disagreeing with the claim of impossibility by a tiny handful of ideologically motivated axe-grinders.

By all conventional standards of historical proof, Belzec happened, end of story - we have multiple contemporary sources identifying it as a death camp, many other sources which only make any sense if that was true, a fair number of witnesses, mainly German, Ukrainian and Polish, saying it was a death camp, and the evidence of physical investigations in 1945 and the 1990s which identified mass graves and masses of human remains.

The deniers spent decades attacking one piece of evidence only - a single witness, Gerstein, and thinking that doing so would not only handwave Belzec away but would cause all the other camps to vanish in a puff of smoke. Then an Italian doofus named Mattogno came up with the mass-graves-aren't-big-enough argument. Until that doofus advanced the argument, nobody was discussing whether Belzec was "possible" or not. Indeed after that doofus came up with the argument, nobody outside the internet was discussing whether Belzec was possible.

Mattogno's argument was countered in 2006, to which he tried to reply, which has led to the current spiral of is-too/is-not nonsense, propagated effectively by about 10 people on the internet - Mattogno, some of his sidekicks, SnakeTongue, and you, countered by an even smaller number of people who disagree with such tosspottery. I don't even notice many chimps at CODOH trying the mass-graves-are-too-small line on. Not that long ago, the chimps at CODOH were denying there were any graves at Belzec at all.

And no, the Holocaust is far from the only event where pseudoscientific discussions are started by ideologically motivated axe grinders; just look next door to the 9/11 forum, or at the JFK conspiracy theories thread; or god help you, the Moon Hoax thread. If you read Russian, you could have a whale of a time reading crankery about Katyn, too.

The denier argument basically amounts to the same nonsense as Daniken and other loonies saying, the pyramids were too big to be built by mere mortals, therefore aliens.

Could someone please post that History Channel gif to underscore this analogy, and keep on posting it every time this nonsense comes up.

Another nonsensical word salad. And you gotta love the spam request.
 
Good to see that you continue to add nothing Clay. No substantive refutation, nothing other than an, "I don't believe it and you can't make me!"

Way to stay in character
 
Good to see that you continue to add nothing Clay. No substantive refutation, nothing other than an, "I don't believe it and you can't make me!"

Way to stay in character

Good luck with that. The Zionists are arch liars who have the Christian world choking on their own ethics.

If you don't realize the Zionists are profiting from the Holocaust too bad.

At least I have the satisfaction of the high road. I know that the German people were not on a Final Solution mission to exterminate the Jewish people of Europe.

It's pathetic that scummy people demand the Jewish people in the camps helped kill women and children and babies to live another day.

http://collections.yadvashem.org/photosarchive/en-us/102719.html

Poland, Belzec, 1942, Sonderkommando personnel in the camp
 
And now we know that you "know", why don't you do this JREF thread a massive favour and leave it? You can return to your absolute final position there. By telling people about how you also "know" that Al Quaida didn't blow up the twin towers and find that satisfying.

Exasperating pests rarely are missed.

Find that satisfying, do you?
 
Last edited:
Another nonsensical word salad. And you gotta love the spam request.

Another hand-waving one-liner post by Clayton that doesn't actually address the content of the post.

You don't understand it != "nonsensical". It just means its Greek to you.
 
Good luck with that. The Zionists are arch liars who have the Christian world choking on their own ethics.

If you don't realize the Zionists are profiting from the Holocaust too bad.

At least I have the satisfaction of the high road. I know that the German people were not on a Final Solution mission to exterminate the Jewish people of Europe.

It's pathetic that scummy people demand the Jewish people in the camps helped kill women and children and babies to live another day.

http://collections.yadvashem.org/photosarchive/en-us/102719.html

Wow. You actually got something right! What happened? Who slipped up? Could there be a tiny sliver of actual humanity breaking through the sneering facade?

The Nazi High Command sought the Final Solution. And not all of them, either; some disagreed on moral grounds, and more disagreed on practical grounds.

The rank and file of the German military, and most certainly the base of the German civilian population may have been (like so much of Europe was and has been for centuries) anti-Semitic, and up for various measures against the perceived "Jewish Problem" up to mass deportation. But they were not a part of, were not required to take part in, may not have even generally aware of, and would likely have been horrified by the Final Solution.

I find it particularly amusing that you leap so hard in defense of the poor German people, when several posters on this thread (myself included) have expressed an admiration for that same people and an eagerness to return (and live and work) in that country.
 
I was just reminded of one of my favourite self-goals of probably the most famous denier of all, the distorian David Irving.

He was speaking at the Eleventh IHR Conference in October 1992 (which transcript is available from the ironically named CODOH) about the Eichmann memoirs, in which Eichmann relates a conversation with Reinhard Heydrich, in which the latter states "The Führer has given the order for the physical destruction of the Jews (Der Führer hat den Befehl zur physischen Vernichtung der Juden gegeben.)" Which of course, completely trashes Irving's thesis that if something bad happened to the Jews, Hitler was not aware. Face with this fatal flaw, does Irving admit the Hitler knew?

No.

He states "Well, if we look just at that sentence, we can say that you've only got to change one or two words and you get a completely different meaning."

That change being that it was actually an order for "die Ausrottung des Judentums" -- Judaism, not Jews.

Never mind that "changing just one or two words" in primary sources is not what real historians *do*.

Never mind that Irving's pet thesis, that Hitler wanted to do away with Judaism, not Jews is further trashed later in the same document (of which, remember, Irving has stipulated the authenticity) when it goes on to discuss the use of Russian anti-tank trenches for the purpose -- how *does* one bury a religion in trenches?

How do our resident deniers conform Eichmann's memoirs with the idea that the Holocaust never happened?

Specifically, CM: you *claim* to be against lies being told for profit regarding the Holocaust. Do you deny that Irving is the most financially successful denier? Do you endorse "just changing a word or two" in a primary source to support a lie?

Why have we never seen you whining about the lies of Irving?

PM'd to DZ and CM so that they cannot pretend they didn't see it, and done so with the clear assertion that any private responses will be posted here, verbatim.
 
Last edited:
Wow. You actually got something right! What happened? Who slipped up? Could there be a tiny sliver of actual humanity breaking through the sneering facade?

The Nazi High Command sought the Final Solution. And not all of them, either; some disagreed on moral grounds, and more disagreed on practical grounds.

The rank and file of the German military, and most certainly the base of the German civilian population may have been (like so much of Europe was and has been for centuries) anti-Semitic, and up for various measures against the perceived "Jewish Problem" up to mass deportation. But they were not a part of, were not required to take part in, may not have even generally aware of, and would likely have been horrified by the Final Solution.

I find it particularly amusing that you leap so hard in defense of the poor German people, when several posters on this thread (myself included) have expressed an admiration for that same people and an eagerness to return (and live and work) in that country.

If you noticed I also defended the Jewish people in the camps by saying they would not have assisted with any genocide in the alleged gas chambers or clean up or burials from alleged gas chambers. I also said the Jewish people wouldn't and the guards themselves wouldn't abide by a policy of atrocities against children and babies.

In the past I've cited that Ike, Winnie and de Gaulle never mentioned the alleged gas chambers and that the Red Cross of that time said there was no genocide against Jewish people going on in the camps.

I know the score. I can't be convinced by a plethora of outrageous war trial lies about atrocities and mythical steam chambers, electric chambers, gas chambers and gas vans. Or bodies incinerated in pits without fuel. Or extraneous facts and numbers and statics that have absolutely nothing to do with an unwritten Final Solution order issued down the ranks with a series of head nods.
 
Team Holocaust??? There's a team for that? What's the uniform? Is it Nazi Armbands or Yarmulkes? What's the score?
 
If you noticed I also defended the Jewish people in the camps by saying they would not have assisted with any genocide in the alleged gas chambers or clean up or burials from alleged gas chambers. I also said the Jewish people wouldn't and the guards themselves wouldn't abide by a policy of atrocities against children and babies..

Your frequent argument from ignorance (as noted many times in the past) aside, it's interesting how readily you defend Jews when it helps paint Nazis in a positive light and slander them when it doesn't.
 
Your frequent argument from ignorance (as noted many times in the past) aside, it's interesting how readily you defend Jews when it helps paint Nazis in a positive light and slander them when it doesn't.
Fact is I'm certain that I never slandered the Jewish people who were assigned to the concentration camps.
 
In the past I've cited that Ike, Winnie and de Gaulle never mentioned the alleged gas chambers and that the Red Cross of that time said there was no genocide against Jewish people going on in the camps.

Welcome to Realpolitik. It was hard enough getting the American People behind the war, and it was a tough job to roll back the Germans (AND take care of business in the Pacific). General Eisenhower was a pragmatist and a planner. Not for him, the long chances and flamboyant strategies of a Patton or a MacArthur. He had a plan to push through Europe, and the last thing he needed was to be pressured into a race into Poland. Especially since, back home, not all Americans would be strongly in favor of risking American lives to save foreign Jews.

Really, it takes very little reading in history to learn about this stuff.

For most people, their reaction on hearing the details of what had taken place at the camps was shock; they had heard rumors, and they knew things were bad, but they had not imagined quite HOW bad they were. For the highly-placed Allies, even if they had better intelligence -- even if they had clear and unimpeachable evidence of exactly what was happening at Treblinka -- they could not afford to admit it just yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom