• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Trayvon Martin, Vigilante Justice

Status
Not open for further replies.
crimresearch said:
Fell for it, did you? Even after the facts were posted?
Click to expand...

crimresearch said:
NBC has statements from attorneys confirming that www.zimmermandefense.com is him.



http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/George...nse-in-Trayvon-Martin-Shooting-146418425.html
Click to expand...

johnny karate said:
That "facts" confirm the website in question is genuine. Other than that, I have no idea what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2...o-raise-money-for-legal-costs-lawyers-confirm
 
Dan O. said:
Is that your claim? How dies the notice of the next neighborhood watch meeting scheduled for March 29th affect that claim? How does Zimmerman's previous 911 call referencing the neighborhood watch meeting with a police officer the previous day affect the claim?
Click to expand...
Why are you asking questions that were answered the last time, and the time before that?

The Neighborhood Watch has disavowed Zimmerman and his actions in being armed, The police liason remembers telling him specifically that he couldn't do such things at the initial meeting, he told the police he was in a personal errand, the media has been calling him 'self appointed' since page one, there is no such rank as 'Captain' because NW isn't a para-military group. Links to all of this have been posted repeatedly.

On the self defense claim, anyone who is able to get away with lying about a shooting, whether they claim it was an accident or self defense, benefits the same as someone who is telling the truth about it being an accident or self defense.

You have no psychic powers, you certainly weren't there, and you've provided no proof that he was lying, or telling the truth.

As pointed out, there isn't enough to be certain one way or the other.

Do you have a point?
 
Dan O. said:
It seams that George can make up any story he wants to say he was in fear for his life now that he's killed the one witness that had the best view of what was hapening.
Click to expand...

Which is exactly why I never disagreed with investigating the initial investigation.
 
Beerina said:
Not any story -- it must be consistent with data from the limited eyewitnesses and the forensic facts.
Click to expand...


That would be why George's lawyer is waiting for that information before making any statements that would limit his options.
 
Dan O. said:
That would be why George's lawyer is waiting for that information before making any statements that would limit his options.
Click to expand...
What statements made to the media limit courtroom options? Do you have a link to a Supreme Court ruling on that?
 
Dan O. said:
Is that your claim? How dies the notice of the next neighborhood watch meeting scheduled for March 29th affect that claim? How does Zimmerman's previous 911 call referencing the neighborhood watch meeting with a police officer the previous day affect the claim?
Click to expand...

I said the claim and I was careful about that. The truth is, I don't know if there was an official neighborhood watch or if they just called it neighborhood watch.
 
sgtbaker said:
I said the claim and I was careful about that. The truth is, I don't know if there was an official neighborhood watch or if they just called it neighborhood watch.
Click to expand...
Bingo. Note that those official looking signs can be purchased online, and not just from the official NW..
 
crimresearch said:
Again, the website that the attorneys were specifically quoted as naming, which was registered with GoDaddy on Friday, is not the same one that the media has seized on.
Click to expand...

Wait, so the one with the graffiti is not his? The link in the news story gives a much different image than the one I saw in another article, last night.
 
sgtbaker said:
Wait, so the one with the graffiti is not his? The link in the news story gives a much different image than the one I saw in another article, last night.
Click to expand...
Why would he put up a website with burned out black churches, Koran burning ralllies and 'Long live George Zimmerman' on it (www.therealgeorgezimmerman.com, which is the one that the media keeps honking about)?
 
Last edited:
crimresearch said:
What statements made to the media limit courtroom options? Do you have a link to a Supreme Court ruling on that?
Click to expand...

When the supreme court holds a session on this board I'll get back to you on that. You seem to have the opinion that the legal result is the only result that matters.
 
crimresearch said:
Why would he put up a website with burned out black churches, Koran burning ralllies and 'Long live George Zimmerman' on it (www.therealgeorgezimmerman.com, which is the one that the media keeps honking about)?
Click to expand...


It has a picture of a vandalized church. Not burned out.

It has a picture of a sign from a rally organized by the pastor who has burned Koran's in the past.

If http://therealgeorgezimmerman.com/ is not his website then his lawyers are exceedingly incompetent as they have had plenty of time to set the record straight on this. And I still think that's the most likely explanation. I just can't believe anybody would be this stupid. If it's his website, then, in my mind, that casts more doubt on his story than anything revealed thus far. If only because the evidence that has come to light so far is too murky to make much of.
 
Dan O. said:
When the supreme court holds a session on this board I'll get back to you on that. You seem to have the opinion that the legal result is the only result that matters.
Click to expand...
When discussing the law, uninformed and factually incorrect opinions are far from useful.

You make these legal pronouncements, and then never back them up with any facts, while questioning facts that have been linked and proven over and over.

Do you have a point???
 
boooeee said:
It has a picture of a vandalized church. Not burned out.

It has a picture of a sign from a rally organized by the pastor who has burned Koran's in the past.

If http://therealgeorgezimmerman.com/ is not his website then his lawyers are exceedingly incompetent as they have had plenty of time to set the record straight on this. And I still think that's the most likely explanation. I just can't believe anybody would be this stupid. If it's his website, then, in my mind, that casts more doubt on his story than anything revealed thus far. If only because the evidence that has come to light so far is too murky to make much of.
Click to expand...
I didn't come up with the claim about churches and rallies, I linked to the direct quote from his attorneys naming an entirely different website.
 
boooeee said:
It has a picture of a vandalized church. Not burned out.

It has a picture of a sign from a rally organized by the pastor who has burned Koran's in the past.

If http://therealgeorgezimmerman.com/ is not his website then his lawyers are exceedingly incompetent as they have had plenty of time to set the record straight on this. And I still think that's the most likely explanation. I just can't believe anybody would be this stupid. If it's his website, then, in my mind, that casts more doubt on his story than anything revealed thus far. If only because the evidence that has come to light so far is too murky to make much of.
Click to expand...

If it is his website (which I am pretty sure it is), his lawyers are incompetent for not yelling at him to take down those pictures or remove the thank you above it. I understand Zimmerman might feel like he has to take support where he can get it, but at this point in the game, I wouldn't think it is wise to align oneself with vandals who've seemed to twist this into making Zimmerman some kind of martyr.
 
crimresearch said:
I didn't come up with the claim about churches and rallies, I linked to the direct quote from his attorneys naming an entirely different website.
Click to expand...


It's not a big deal, but you did. The claims of pictures of "burned out" churches and pictures of Koran burning rallies came from you, most likely based on a mis-reading of the article Puppycow linked to. But if you can show me where the claim did not originate form you, I'll admit I was wrong.

Several news organizations have claimed that Zimmerman's lawyers have confirmed that http://therealgeorgezimmerman.com/ is legit. Are you denying that? Or are you claiming that they are mistaken? This is not a trick question. Just curious what your position is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom