crimresearch
Alumbrado
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Messages
- 10,600
I suspect that Nancy Grace is salivating over it even as we speak.Well that sounds like an insanity-defense. I don't know what will come out if this goes to a trial (disgusting that we have to say "if"), but if Zimmerman may have believed he was in imminent danger due to a racist attitude or drunken state of mind...I don't see how that can justify his behavior when a reasonable person would probably never have believed it and never have taken a gun and chased the boy down. Unless this is the same as claiming you're not guilty by reason of insanity. And if it isn't, it would seem quite clear that if you admit to killing someone, as the affirmative defense states, you would have to prove that those circumstances occurred, which makes perfect sense since otherwise it basically legalizes murder as long as there are no witnesses. Grand Theft Auto 4 is a good video game, but I don't think its punishment system applies in real-life.
Furthermore, what about the issue of Trayvon's perspective? Isn't Trayvon justified in attacking a man who was obstructing his path, wouldn't leave him alone, then left his car, revealing that he had a GUN in a visible holster, and started chasing him down on foot? No matter what Zimmerman may be able to prove about Trayvon attacking him, it may be that Trayvon SHOULD have attacked him under the law.
This may be Amanda Knox II.
Both the shooter's and the victim's behaviors will certainly be portrayed by one side as contributory, and the other as reasonable.
This isn't an insanity defense because Zimmerman's claims of reasonable belief are based on things that apparently did happen.
In what fashion they happened we don't know, but he isn't claiming that he had to shoot the victim because he was a vampire.
I will repeat something I said a while back... in the 4 or so previous incidents where Zimmerman has been involved in allegations of violence, his version of the story has matched the textbook appropriate defense every time.
Which is what we could also expect from an innocent person.
How many coincidences do we believe though?

