• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Southwind17 said:
Please explain what 'evidence', exactly, you are alluding to that does not simply constitute a view or opinion of Jack White. Please identify to us exactly what anomalies you consider Jack White has demonstrated that you believe are irrefutable, and why. The more specific you are in your response the more meaningful the ensuing discussion will be, hopefully.
Click to expand...
Robert - feel free to prioritise this over the definition of 'expert', if you're suffering from writer's block.
 
Southwind17 said:
Look, RK, I've already indicated to you that it's an exit wound, not a moustache. Isn't it obvious to you simply by looking at the photo? It's an area of plain blackness, hence there's surely nothing there. Wouldn't a moutache be ... well ... hairy?!
Click to expand...
Ahem.
 

Attachments

  • GrouchoMarx.jpg
    GrouchoMarx.jpg
    48 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
HSienzant said:
Robert, there are three different poses of Oswald in that backyard, correct?

I think what you need to explain is why conspirators would go to the trouble of creating three separate images when one would suffice to 'frame Oswald in the eyes of the American public'.

Three are harder to create than one, and by creating three, the conspirators might overlook something in one photo that would reveal the conspiracy, correct (you, in fact, claim that things like the apparent different chin shape are indeed evidence of things they overlooked).

But why create three? Couldn't they do a better job on just one, and couldn't one image create the necessary frame-up?

Can you explain this?

And elsewhere, you alleged Marina did take photos of Oswald in the backyard, just NOT THESE PHOTOS. So now you have the conspirators destroying legitimate photos of Oswald, with his rifle, taken by Marina, and substituting not one, not two, BUT THREE DIFFERENT FAKES.

And this makes sense to you? Please explain why they would do all this unnecessary work, when one legitimate image (which you earlier claimed existed) would accomplish the same end.

Thanks,

Hank
Click to expand...
To compound this issue they had to insert an entire body shot, according to Prey. That almost definitely would have been more difficult than, say, simply swap out heads (which is what I would do if I wanted to make someone appear to have done something they did not), oh yeah let's not forget th issue of the chins.

On second thought, let's. That's just a stupid claim.
 
Robert Prey said:
Objective Reality 101. Now boys and girls, are these two chins the same or different????
Click to expand...

The same chin. You see, even long before the advent of photography people have known that lights and shadows can play all sorts of tricks on features. Except for you, apparently.
 
Last edited:
Mudcat said:
The same chin. You see, even long before the advent of photography people have known that lights and shadows can play all sorts of tricks on features. Except for you, apparently.
Click to expand...
Tricks?! Forget it - there are no flies on Robert - No siree! :rolleyes:
 
I dont want to put a dampener on this thread and the fun we are all having at Roberts expense but I was wondering about the backyard photos and all the kerfuffle surrounding their alledged fakery.

Why would they need a patsy at all?
Why didnt they just use the grassy knoll shooter and let him get away with it?
 
jargon buster said:
I dont want to put a dampener on this thread and the fun we are all having at Roberts expense but I was wondering about the backyard photos and all the kerfuffle surrounding their alledged fakery.

Why would they need a patsy at all?
Why didnt they just use the grassy knoll shooter and let him get away with it?
Click to expand...

They need a dead Patsy i order to shut down any clamor for a continued investigation.
 
Hank wrote:


"When did those people (the Hesters) first come forward with the story you now tell of the photos? I believe it was more than a decade after the event. How reliable is memory and in the absence of evidence establishing their story,"

Comment: Evidence to establish their story???
Have you also forgotten about Oswald's Ghost
 
JayUtah said:
Please refrain from putting words in my mouth. Honestly, if you can't make headway in an argument without pretending that people have said things they haven't said, then what good are you?
Click to expand...

Then why don't you put some words in your own mouth??? Take a stand, man. Are the photos legit or not????
 
Mudcat wrote:

"I would ask if you had a citation for the claim about the transparency, but it's very likely they did have that transparency. They suspected Oswald so probably taken a photo of the back yard as part of research (something foreign to you, obviously) before acting."

Comment:
Very likely they had the transparency the night before they "found" the photos in the Paine Garage?????
 
They need a dead Patsy i order to shut down any clamor for a continued investigation.
Click to expand...
Shut down!!!!!
Robert, why didnt it work on you?
'They' dont need a patsy, 'they' are in charge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom