Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

Okay, so how close is "near freefall speeds"? 90% of freefall? 80%? 70%?

It should take a brick from the top of the WTC1 about 9.2 seconds (in the vacuum of space). Adding for air resistance an a terminal velocity of about 150 km/h I'd say 13 seconds. One tower fell in about 16 seconds and the other in about 18 or 20 seconds if not mistaken. So that's roughly 70% I guess.
 
Last edited:
It should take a brick from the top of the WTC1 about 9.2 seconds (on the Moon). Adding for air resistance an a terminal velocity of about 150 km/h I'd say 13 seconds. One tower fell in about 16 seconds and the other in about 18 or 20 seconds if not mistaken. So that's roughly 70% I guess.

The Moon? WTF?!
 
It looks like a pretzel to you because you're looking at it from the presupposition that those charges need to remain intact and functional. When in truth my theory does not require them to survive the impact and subsequent fires. But of course you didn't know that because you labelled me and stereotyped me and worked from there.
I didn't know you from Adam 24 hours ago.

So the charges just teleport themselves into the building right before they need to be detonated? Please, expound upon this theory, in detail.

Remember that you specifically said the charges were in the impact zones. How would they function as explosives if they weren't intact and/or functional?
 
It should take a brick from the top of the WTC1 about 9.2 seconds (on the Moon). Adding for air resistance an a terminal velocity of about 150 km/h I'd say 13 seconds. One tower fell in about 16 seconds and the other in about 18 or 20 seconds if not mistaken. So that's roughly 70% I guess.

I see. Can you find any known CDs (on the Moon) with that margin?
 
What building do you think fell at "near g acceleration"?

You now understand, I hope, that "g" is an acceleration, which is different than a speed.

Yes I understand and it is also a constant. Thus both buildings fall under g(=9.81m/s^2). As both are at sea level. As objects pick up speed they confront air resistance in the form of drag which gives a resulting acceleration of less than g.
 
Remember that you specifically said the charges were in the impact zones. How would they function as explosives if they weren't intact and/or functional?

They didn't function because they were neither intact nor functional.
 
There were no explosives in the towers. Collapse began in the impact zones, and your explosives could not have survived there, let alone for an hour during a massive fire.

To think otherwise is pure, unadulterated stupidity.
 
Really? Please explain?

I really shouldn't be shocked. The thermite reaction is both self heating and self oxidizing. Seriously, if you don;t even understand this then you shouldn't be telling others what to believe. But like most truthers I am sure that in no way impedes you.


ETA: "The thermite reaction".
 
Last edited:
It should take a brick from the top of the WTC1 about 9.2 seconds (in the vacuum of space). Adding for air resistance an a terminal velocity of about 150 km/h I'd say 13 seconds. One tower fell in about 16 seconds and the other in about 18 or 20 seconds if not mistaken. So that's roughly 70% I guess.


JM,

Do you know what REALLY cheeses me off?

When someone completely screws up the analysis ...

... and still comes up with the right answer.


For an object dropped from a zero initial vertical velocity from some height (h):

d = 0.5 a t2
a = 2 d / ( t)2
Now the question is "what is the correct value for d?"

I'll give you a hint: a semi truck is heading for a wall. Do you register the impact as happening when the front bumper hits the wall, or when the rear bumper finally gets there?

___

Background:
The Truthers initially were aghast that debris hit the ground at, essentially free fall acceleration. Well, a bunch of material DID fall at this acceleration: the material that fell outside the footprint of the building and WAS, therefore, in free fall.

Big "Duh".

When people pointed out that there are images of external panes at about the 20th floor height, while the collapse zone is around the 60th floor, it finally occurred to SOME truthers that the acceleration of the material thrown clear of the building was irrelevant to what was happening within the footprint of the building.

Other truthers have never caught on to that concept.

I'll assume that you're in the first group.
___

Regardless, the initial accelerations of the upper blocks of the towers (first 15 stories, until the block disappeared into the cloud of debris) were accurately measured at about 0.7g & 0.75g for the two buildings.

Then, as the buildings accelerated, resistance forces built up until they achieved a fairly constant speed. But this is extremely difficult to measure, because they descended into obscuring clouds of debris.

So, if you do a force diagram, you arrive at the 1st order approximation that the lower portion of the building applied an AVERAGE force to the upper blocks over this initial 15 story drop of about .3 W, where W is the weight of the upper block.

The upper blocks weighed about 50,000 tons (IIRC).

That means that the lower portion of the buildings applied a resisting force, during the initial collapse, of around 15,000 tons.

This is not an "insignificant" amount of force.

This is not "almost no resistance".
 
I really shouldn't be shocked. The thermite reaction is both self heating and self oxidizing. Seriously, if you don;t even understand this then you shouldn't be telling others what to believe. But like most truthers I am sure that in no way impedes you.


ETA: "The thermite reaction".
Classic. Do you think it's worthy of a stundie candidate?

Javaman - please write the chemical equation for the classic thermite reaction.
 
The upper blocks weighed about 50,000 tons (IIRC).

That means that the lower portion of the buildings applied a resisting force, during the initial collapse, of around 15,000 tons.

This is not an "insignificant" amount of force.

This is not "almost no resistance".

Exactly my point. So if a brick falls from the top floor of WTC 1 in 9.2 seconds (in vacuum) and would drop in say 12 seconds with air resistance. Then the NOT "insignificant" amount of force you mention should account for more than the air. Which accounts for 3 second delay or aprox 33% of original drop time in vacuum. Thus it is hard to believe that all that resistance you mention only adds up 4 or 5 seconds to the total drop time of the building. Unless of course said resistance isn't there because it was removed by charges below the impact zone.
 
I really shouldn't be shocked. The thermite reaction is both self heating and self oxidizing. Seriously, if you don;t even understand this then you shouldn't be telling others what to believe. But like most truthers I am sure that in no way impedes you.


ETA: "The thermite reaction".

Oh so you mean to say that in space all I'd need to do is heat up the thermite to its ignition temperature and it would keep burning on its own accord?
 

Back
Top Bottom