Moderated Obama birth certificate CT / SSN CT / Birther discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
:confused: I didn't find many photos of George W. Bush or Bill Clinton as students either. Maybe all U.S. Presidents go to special training camps instead and the claim of them having studied at ordinary universities only being made up fairy tales for the clueless masses.

I have seen no photos of anyone before about 1840... possibly there were people existing at all before the invention of photography.
 
I have seen no photos of anyone before about 1840... possibly there were people existing at all before the invention of photography.

But you see Bill Clinton and George W. Bush didn't live before 1840. Nor did any of their supposed classmates. Don't you think a classmate of a U.S. President would be proud of their school photos with themselves together with a President? Yet barely any such photos can be found on the Internet.
 
Why don't you post the records of YOUR mother's hosipitization when you were born.

Just try and get it, I dare you.

I double dog dare you.

I triple dog dare you!

I just don't think that is very responsive. So I take it no one has established that simple fact???
 
Originally Posted by Robert Prey
Has anyone explained how Obama could have been born in a Hawaii hospital with no record of his mother's hospitalization???



Many times.


Many times.


Great! So where's the proof?
 
Last edited:
Yes?? That's all?

That's all you asked for. And, in fact, someone in between my post that you responded to, and Craig4's post that you responded to, posted the proof itself, which you ignored completely. Which means you were apparently just jealous of the attention Anders Lindmann was getting here and are simply trolling yet another thread.
 
Last edited:
Bob, the State of Hawaii says he was born there and has provided the piece of paper that says so.

The US Constitution says that that piece of paper MUST be accepted as correct by the other states.
 
I just don't think that is very responsive. So I take it no one has established that simple fact???

It is extremely responsive. Consider the issues involved.

1) Medical records are private, and if they DID exist, you would not be entitled to see them.
2) Hospitals don't retain records for 50 years.

'nuff said.
 
It is extremely responsive. Consider the issues involved.

1) Medical records are private, and if they DID exist, you would not be entitled to see them.
2) Hospitals don't retain records for 50 years.

'nuff said.

How dare you confuse the matter with actual facts!!!eleventy!!

It is all about unfounded belief, to which you must succumb.

Oh and call me master and stroke my ego while you are at it.
 
The hospital I was born in doesn't even exist anymore. I guess that makes me a non-citizen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom