Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I was in the forces, I had enrolled under a contract, and was in fact paid to follow lawful orders. Now that I am not, I am not obliged to obey their orders, to say shine my boots and stand at attention, am I? Now compare to a court. If I am not an officer of the court, nor paid by it, am I obliged to follow their orders without recompense? The clerks get paid for following the judges orders, and cannot be compelled to be a clerk without payment. So why should anyone else be so compelled?

So did you have a contract with CBC to use their video on your WFS site? And if so, why did you consent to them using statutory copyright law to remove it? I'm puzzled, old bean :confused::confused:
 
So did you have a contract with CBC to use their video on your WFS site? And if so, why did you consent to them using statutory copyright law to remove it? I'm puzzled, old bean :confused::confused:

Were you ordered to remove it, Rob? How much did you charge them to remove it?
 
..because his cellmate insisted on it. ;)

Thompson mentions the sex abuse he suffered in childhood and links it to his now having dual genders.

Over the months and years that Keith Thompson has been doing his thing one can sense a growing lunacy in his words and deeds. I doubt that during that time a single freeman buddy urged him to get the help of mental health professionals.

Indeed, this kind of lunacy was even encouraged by the folks who put him on underground radio, the WFS and the folks over at the Ickes Forum.
 
So did you have a contract with CBC to use their video on your WFS site? And if so, why did you consent to them using statutory copyright law to remove it? I'm puzzled, old bean :confused::confused:

As far as I am aware, the video is still up. So not sure what you are talking about old bean. And no I do not have a contract, but rules of fair use for educational purposes apply. Old bean.
 
As far as I am aware, the video is still up.
Perhaps you should become aware past the end of your own nose.

"This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Canadian Broadcasting Corporation."​


So not sure what you are talking about old bean. And no I do not have a contract, but rules of fair use for educational purposes apply. Old bean.
Remind us all again, how much time did you spend not understanding any law at all?
 
As far as I am aware, the video is still up. So not sure what you are talking about old bean. And no I do not have a contract, but rules of fair use for educational purposes apply. Old bean.
Video is down. Take 30 seconds and check for yourself. Of course, you can always be the mole in a game of whack-a-mole with the CBC by re-posting it.

And your ignorance of law shows again. Fair use is American law. Fair dealing is Canadian law. They are different, and there is a legal test for fair dealing which you are unlikely to pass given that you simply reposted the entire work (the amount of infringement is part of the test).

Same goes for your pathetic "de-bunking" of the piece. Copying the entire work and embedding some commentary in it is not likely, (but just barely possibly), fair dealing for any reason. And the reason in this case would be criticism, not education.

You should also be aware that parody is not covered by fair dealing.

You would know these simple facts if you were half the law expert you claim to be.
 
Last edited:
Were you ordered to remove it, Rob? How much did you charge them to remove it?

AGAIN. I am not the Admin for the site, they did not 'order' us to remove it, and I am unsure what video you are referring to. The links I saw were active still.
 
Rob,

Still waiting to hear your explanation for the hobo chic for your centre piece on the national broadcaster. Why not a suit to show of your fabulous FMOTL wealth? Hot medium; you squandered a golden opportunity. Surely you must've had your rationale; what was it?

Fitz

I have no desire to discuss fashion with you. My clothes were clean, comfortable, warm, and the sweater has personal significance for me. People who know me know I am no slave to fashion.
 
AGAIN. I am not the Admin for the site
yep, someone elses neck on the line again.

Hey Rob, why dont you just tell the guys at WFS to withdraw consent to the copyright act and keep showing the video, you can school them through the process.

After all Im sure they dont have to front you $250 first.

How about it?
 
As far as I am aware, the video is still up. So not sure what you are talking about old bean. And no I do not have a contract, but rules of fair use for educational purposes apply. Old bean.

Just checked again (18:08 GMT), click the play button, get a message saying "No longer available due to a copyright claim by Canadian Broadcasting Corporation", old chappie.
The Bob Marley stuff is still okay though:)
 
Last edited:
Even worse, in some langauges the TPTB haven't allowed for hypens!!!!

Poor Chinese

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Poor Menard trying so hard to act like a FMOLT while trying to conduct a con-business in the real world
 
Last edited:
It's a bizarre conspiracy of language.

Somehow, TPTB have embedded their nefarious agenda in plain english words. It just takes a little creative hyphenating to reveal it.

I can't imagine what the world must look like to people that think the very language they speak is tool of control against them.

Sorry, is rob of the menard family really claiming homonyms do not exist?
 
AGAIN. I am not the Admin for the site, they did not 'order' us to remove it, and I am unsure what video you are referring to. The links I saw were active still.

But the admin acts under your direction? Where does the buck stop in the WFS site?
And maybe your admin should keep you better informed. What did Sun Tzu say about the importance of communication between troops?
 
Alrighty then, that's just messed up.

WOW... I do not remember making that claim. Nor do I remember empowering D"Rok to speak for me.


But you go ahead, ask questions about me, and accept as truth the lies that others say about me.

Yes I do believe homonyms exist.

Of course, you will prefer to believe D'Rok, or anyone else who attacks me, for expressing ideas you do not hold. Right?
 
I have no desire to discuss fashion with you. My clothes were clean, comfortable, warm, and the sweater has personal significance for me. People who know me know I am no slave to fashion.

In a way Bobby boy might be making a good marketing move by dressing like a beer bloated hobo.

Since so many freemen are living in vans, on their sister’s couch, in powerless and waterless homes in which they have squatted one could easily see where their guru could come off as a stuffed shirt if he cleaning up his act too much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom