The Incredible odds of fulfilled bible prophecy

Then you don't think Isaiah 53 and my other 118 posts in here have any merit?



PRECISELY......


Can you please respond to this post

DOC,

I have a simple question that you can answer simply.

If I foretell that it will rain tomorrow and it does not would you accept my slimy excuses that it ALMOST rained because it was cloudy as an acceptable salvage of my prognosticating abilities.... would you say that my prognosis was correct?​

Please do not obfuscate and wriggle.....just answer the question.
 
Then you don't think Isaiah 53 and my other 118 posts in here have any merit?

Yes. Isaiah and all you posts are completely without merit. Glad we can agree on something for a change.
 
Your fallacy of "argument by post count" has repeatedly been laughed out of the room in various threads. Do you even read the responses?
There's little evidence he reads his own posts, let alone anyone else's.
 
You have to wonder why US life expectancy ranking is going down so fast with the greatest medicine in the world.


No wonder, however, about your desperation to change the subject away from the thread topic which, one suspects, even you are beginning to realise is made from concentrated fail.
 
Then you don't think Isaiah 53 and my other 118 posts in here have any merit?


  1. Isiah 53 has merit as a historical document which provides insights into the thinking of its authors. It also has some value as being the inspiration for a great deal of medieval religious art, although the Christian interpretation of the passage on which this art is based is mere fantasy and has little or no worth in its own right.

  2. None of your posts have any merit, especially the ones in which you refer to your piddling little post count.
 
I've noticed someone's analysis of an alleged failed prophecy (in here) has omitted a very important verse that was in the same chapter. I should get to it by next Wednesday.
 
I've noticed someone's analysis of an alleged failed prophecy (in here) has omitted a very important verse that was in the same chapter. I should get to it by next Wednesday.

We know that you are a slow reader.
 
I've noticed someone's analysis of an alleged failed prophecy (in here) has omitted a very important verse that was in the same chapter. I should get to it by next Wednesday.


That's an unusual way of using parentheses that I've only seen one other poster here use. How strange.

In any case, what's with not just pointing out the problem you claim to have found now? What's going to change in the next 4 or 5 days?

And when will you be acknowledging the failure of the Nebuchadnezzer prophecy?
 
Last edited:
I've noticed someone's analysis of an alleged failed prophecy (in here) has omitted a very important verse that was in the same chapter. I should get to it by next Wednesday.
Stop playing games.
If you had a logically consistent argument to make, you would make it.
Instead, you are trying to be coy about your argument, giving the impression of a highschool girl who doesn't want to admit she forgot her homework.
 
That's an unusual way of using parentheses that I've only seen one other poster here use. How strange.

In any case, what's with not just pointing out the problem you claim to have found now? What's going to change in the next 4 or 5 days?
Nebuchadnezzar will resurrect? :p
 

Back
Top Bottom