February Stundie Nominations

time for another denier Stundie nomination, although past form suggests we need to let them warm up before producing anything truly classic. Here's shyster on RODOH forum:

Negative evidence being positive evidence of a non-event? Can you clarify your point? If no mass graves can be located at Treblinka (i.e. if is the case that there is negative evidence of mass graves), surely it follows that this is positive evidence that c.850,000 people were not in fact murdered and burried in mass graves at Treblinka?

the confusion between positive and negative evidence is profound....
 
Fake fakery by a fake

When viewing the famous Buzz Aldrin punch, what is obvious to the whole world becomes the latest mad theory from Docsocks.....

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8061479&postcount=7504

"The fake punch is far from irrelevant, HUGE find.....insanely significant, proves Apollo Fraudulence from the comfort of my living room. ABSOLUTELY KILLER, HISTORIC FINDING, the bogus Sibrel getting punched out jive is..... "


To summarise, Bart Sibrel actually didn't do this, it is green screen fakery, and NASA employed Sibrel to make a fake hoax film.:covereyes

p.s. probably not stundie material, more AAH forum content.
 
Last edited:
When viewing the famous Buzz Aldrin punch, what is obvious to the whole world becomes the latest mad theory from Docsocks.....

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8061479&postcount=7504

"The fake punch is far from irrelevant, HUGE find.....insanely significant, proves Apollo Fraudulence from the comfort of my living room. ABSOLUTELY KILLER, HISTORIC FINDING, the bogus Sibrel getting punched out jive is..... "


To summarise, Bart Sibrel actually didn't do this, it is green screen fakery, and NASA employed Sibrel to make a fake hoax film.:covereyes

p.s. probably not stundie material, more AAH forum content.


Personally, I'm tentatively classifying Patrick1000 as a prolific troll similar to Anders Lindman. However, where the person behind Anders Lindman chooses a sort of calm and fanciful disconnection from reality, the person behind Patrick1000 chooses raging insanity.

Although, honestly, I don't know if the sheer number of alleged sockpuppets indicates an obsessive dedication to the craft or an actual illness—or if there's even any meaningful difference.
 
Last edited:
Not sure if this is stundie funny, but does seem stupid to me:
It's a subjective opinion. But in your heart you know I'm right.

So somebody has a subjective opinion formed by their own experiences. Which is subject. But not only are they wrong about that opinion is, Robert knows what they REALLY feel?

Does he understand what the first sentence means? And why it negates the second?
 
Personally, I'm tentatively classifying Patrick1000 as a prolific troll similar to Anders Lindman. However, where the person behind Anders Lindman chooses a sort of calm and fanciful disconnection from reality, the person behind Patrick1000 chooses raging insanity.

Although, honestly, I don't know if the sheer number of alleged sockpuppets indicates an obsessive dedication to the craft or an actual illness—or if there's even any meaningful difference.



I had him pegged as a troll early on.
More recently, I'm not so sure. If he's a troll, he wastes a lot of time and effort on typing his posts. I think he may have an unhealthy obsession.
 
I had him pegged as a troll early on.
More recently, I'm not so sure. If he's a troll, he wastes a lot of time and effort on typing his posts. I think he may have an unhealthy obsession.


Note that being a troll doesn't necessarily mean that one doesn't believe what one says (or at least want to spread it around; it's entirely possible that Patrick doesn't believe any of the garbage he posts, but that his purpose in posting is to slander NASA, rather than to wind up the posters here). So he could well be a troll either way.
 
http://forum.davidicke.com/showpost.php?p=1060647293&postcount=17
from ickes goldmine
The op hasn't paid council tax and didn't turn up in court and now has a liability order against her and as such the bailiffs are a knocking.

heres the comment from Jayen4
Well, you could 'greet' them with a couple of shotguns.....and for good measure,station a couple of snipers on the roofs around your house !!
(And I'm only half joking there A.A. !).

I know what it's like to be on the receiving end of these thugs and leeches behaviour ! The problem is that they have no respect or honour whatsoever ! As I've told a couple of judges to their faces ! Grrr !!!

No respect or honour :)
Yep, not paying your council tax is the honourable thing to do.

NB , I did also notice the use of firearms subtly advocated as well, wont be long before we have our first sovereign shooter in the UK.
 
I wonder where s/he will get snipers with a death wish?

Also shooting people with shotguns is honourable apparently.
 
Last edited:
From a Facebook debate on 9/11. Atahan explains why his opinions should take precedence over reality.
Atahan Ganduu: evidence and facts are great tools used in illusionville.
 
Our latest Fluoride crank ejaculated; Take that years of education!!

In the North East of England the Seaport of Hartlepool gets it's water from Artesian Wells, they have a natural high level of FLouride. THey have the lowest incidence of tooth decay in the UK.

Seems that infor is out of date, they get their water from the same source as everyone else in County Durham now, surface reservoirs rather than their artesian wells, only the Camerons Brewery uses them now.
 
Last edited:
More Facebook 9/11 nonsense. Apparently when a 350,000 pound jet moving at 500 mph hits an immovable support, it should just stop and stay there "sticking out" of the building.

Atahan Ganduu: Well the building was not as thin as a road sign it was infinitely more rigid than an airplane
Atahan Ganduu: Let's suppOse the aircraft made it through the wall, after 37 feet when it reaches the core columns nothing else is going in. It was a hoax, nobody crashed into anything on 911
 
Last edited:
A very late* entry from our friends at Nukelies:

http://nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=587

I think they're getting ready to "prove" to themselves that the Blitz didn't really happen and was a propaganda effort on the part of Churchill's government to justify the war against the Nazis.

-------
*I'm not sure if this one shouldn't be moved to the March Stundies, as it was posted very early AM today.
 
A very late* entry from our friends at Nukelies:

http://nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=587

I think they're getting ready to "prove" to themselves that the Blitz didn't really happen and was a propaganda effort on the part of Churchill's government to justify the war against the Nazis.

-------
*I'm not sure if this one shouldn't be moved to the March Stundies, as it was posted very early AM today.

Good God some of the stuff over there would make a Klansman blush.
 
A very late* entry from our friends at Nukelies:

http://nukelies.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=587

I think they're getting ready to "prove" to themselves that the Blitz didn't really happen and was a propaganda effort on the part of Churchill's government to justify the war against the Nazis.

-------
*I'm not sure if this one shouldn't be moved to the March Stundies, as it was posted very early AM today.

he says 'Two views of St Paul's during rebuilding of the surrounding area. Even these look strange!'

Erm, yes, most of the area has been destroyed by bombing!

In fact the last 'bomb site' in the City was just redeveloped a few years ago, it was still an empty lot being used for xar parking up until recently.
 

Back
Top Bottom