Triumph of the Bigoted, Intolerant Left: Buchanan Fired

Biscuit said:
That full letter is a load of nonsense! How is his first amendment right being denied? MSNBC is a business and their customers no longer wish to listen to Pat so MSNBC, as a private company, chooses to no longer have him on the air. Its called business and I guess Pat is bad for it.
Click to expand...

Who references anything about the First Amendment?? Except you? Intolerance, Bigotry, that's the what the firing is all about.
 
Robert Prey said:
Who references anything about the First Amendment?? Except you? Intolerance, Bigotry, that's the what the firing is all about.
Click to expand...

Why good sir unless someone stole your login and password it was you in your second post on this thread. If your account has been hijacked you should report it to a moderator.

Robert Prey said:
Intolerant -- referring to people opposed to free speech for those with whom they disagree. Bigoted -- referring to those who are offended by those who speak in favor of traditional moral values.
Click to expand...

(I highlighted it for you to avoid confusion!)

To avoid further confusion here is the text of the first amendment, again highlighted for your understanding.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Upchurch said:
The problem is, Robert, that the "moral" values you are in favor of are not traditional for everyone nor are they particularly moral. They would be more accurately described, perhaps, as evangelical moral values. (I would argue fanatical or extremist evangelical moral values, but I digress.)

For example, they are not even traditional for the GOP.
Click to expand...

Re; Your example: The GOP has no unified philosophy. Some want to police the world and continue to prosecute dumb wars, like the War on Drugs, Ron Paul wants to stop policing the world and end the War on Drugs. Romney wants to stop the insane spending, Gingrich wants to spend more trillions for a colony on the moon. On the Dem side, it's little more unified. Tax, tax, tax, spend, spend, spend, elect, elect, elect. Multi-trillions in debt? kick it down the road. Most of us will be dead by the time America collapses anyway. Handouts, bailouts, Freebies for everyone. Who cares about the children? I'll take mine now, and let the devil take the hindmost. and Pro-choice means a national holocaust of 30 millions of the unborn. Hey, it's legal ain't it? Supremes said so!!!
 
Last edited:
Upchurch said:
Twelve Pretty Racist Or Just Crazy Quotes From Pat Buchanan’s New Book

Hispanic Americans are incapable of maintaining American values?



Buchanan is delusional if he thinks a little diversity in the workplace is anything approaching what life was like under Jim Crow laws.


"If whites aren't in charge, they will be oppressed." :rolleyes:


Of course before the 1960s, there was little-to-no social, racial, or gender equality.



America is not America if it is not European?


'nuff said.


Apparently, Buchanan's memory does not reach back prior to the 1970s.


This is merely delusional. We were completely separated but we "shared a country and a culture"? We were one nation?

We were Americans, but some Americans were more American than others and that is what Buchanan is regretting the loss of.
Click to expand...

So??? Where's the racism????
 
Tony said:
In the Orwellian world of CONservatives, it is bigoted to be against bigotry, intolerant to be against intolerance and racist to be against racism.
Click to expand...

Lots' of stuff thrown on the wall, but no one has been able to point to any racism, bigotry of intolerance on the part or Pat B.
 
Ladewig said:
Please stop being disingenuous.

Are you honestly going to try to defend the position that nothing in that post was racist?
Click to expand...

I'd just like a little specificity. It's easy to call people names, but if you can't back it up....
 
And THAT is why the left is bigoted and intolerant. Always calling names, never backing it up. For shame, The Bigoted and Intolerant Left.
 
Robert Prey said:
Intolerant -- referring to people opposed to free speech for those with whom they disagree. Bigoted -- referring to those who are offended by those who speak in favor of traditional moral values.
Click to expand...

Quick question. So do the traditional moral (absolute) values include placing the Ten Commandments in courtrooms and classrooms?
 
Biscuit said:
Why good sir unless someone stole your login and password it was you in your second post on this thread. If your account has been hijacked you should report it to a moderator.



(I highlighted it for you to avoid confusion!)

To avoid further confusion here is the text of the first amendment, again highlighted for your understanding.
Click to expand...

If you seek to turn off somebody's micophone, you are against him speaking freely, first amendment or no first amendment. Get it?????
 
Robert Prey said:
If you seek to turn off somebody's micophone, you are against him speaking freely, first amendment or no first amendment. Get it?????
Click to expand...
If that racist piece of crap wants to stand up and say that it is his right right to tell a bunch of insecure, mouth-breathing cretins that they are going to be victims of the brown people unless they rise up and resist people like me, and those mouth-breathing cretins have firearms, he poses a threat to my life.

Why have I then no right, if not the obligation, to shout the slimeball down and discourage corporations from providing him with a venue from which to rally the barbarians?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom