Why did 9/11 need to be so elaborate?

Well, heck, I'll take a shot at answering the OP's question.

Whether this is all that elaborate or not, we'll see. But to get the most shock and awe possible, you would collapse the towers before everyone went to work (maximum viewage), and save 7 for the final exclamation point when they got off after work (maximum viewage). Hope that helps.
 
He copped a plea did he? ...or was he waterboarded and put in a box until he couldn't take it any longer...I've heard of cases like that.

Take it up with Moussaouis defense team. They'll be very interested to hear their client doesn't belong in supermax prison.

But until Moussaoui steps outside the gates of ADX Florence, the official story remains proven beyond reasonable doubt.
 
Well, heck, I'll take a shot at answering the OP's question.

Whether this is all that elaborate or not, we'll see. But to get the most shock and awe possible, you would collapse the towers before everyone went to work (maximum viewage), and save 7 for the final exclamation point when they got off after work (maximum viewage). Hope that helps.

You're probably too young to remember, but the whole world stopped working after the first tower fell.
 
Concerning US time zones, it was good timing. Zimbabwe? I'm not so sure. The world is a pretty big place.
 
Well, heck, I'll take a shot at answering the OP's question.

Whether this is all that elaborate or not, we'll see. But to get the most shock and awe possible, you would collapse the towers before everyone went to work (maximum viewage), and save 7 for the final exclamation point when they got off after work (maximum viewage). Hope that helps.

Weak. Crash a single plane into Yankee or Fenway while the Red Sox & Yankees are playing. (Preferably during the playoffs.) Do it around the 4th or 5th inning so you can get plenty of family shots.

In one blow, Everyman & celebrities get taken out. "They hate us for our freedoms" gets driven home even deeper & even more jump on the war wagon. Plus, far less things for idiots on YouTube to imagine.
 
Well, heck, I'll take a shot at answering the OP's question.

Whether this is all that elaborate or not, we'll see. But to get the most shock and awe possible, you would collapse the towers before everyone went to work (maximum viewage), and save 7 for the final exclamation point when they got off after work (maximum viewage). Hope that helps.

No, it really doesn't add anything of value.
 
Weak. Crash a single plane into Yankee or Fenway while the Red Sox & Yankees are playing. (Preferably during the playoffs.) Do it around the 4th or 5th inning so you can get plenty of family shots.

In one blow, Everyman & celebrities get taken out. "They hate us for our freedoms" gets driven home even deeper & even more jump on the war wagon. Plus, far less things for idiots on YouTube to imagine.

Yet could be attributed to a lone psycho, and not so much any group one wished to blame.
 
Yet could be attributed to a lone psycho, and not so much any group one wished to blame.

If "they" were planning it to go to war, why would they claim a lone psycho?
 
If "they" were planning it to go to war, why would they claim a lone psycho?

I'm always amused by the "9/11 was an excuse to invade Iraq argument". Read Woodward's series of books about 9/11, Afghanistan and Iraq. It's pretty clear that 9/11 disrupted the Administration's plans for Iraq and probably pushed back the start of the war for about a year. If anything 9/11 was an impediment to Iraq.
 
You just bedunked yourself. Saved me the time.
Why are you even bothering?

He copped a plea did he? ...or was he waterboarded and put in a box until he couldn't take it any longer...I've heard of cases like that.
He chose to represent himself and was convicted in open court, after refusing to enter a plea. The court entered a "not guilty" plea on his behalf.


Well, heck, I'll take a shot at answering the OP's question.

Whether this is all that elaborate or not, we'll see.
Wow. Already trying to muddy the waters from the first sentence.

But to get the most shock and awe possible, you would collapse the towers before everyone went to work (maximum viewage), and save 7 for the final exclamation point when they got off after work (maximum viewage). Hope that helps.
You are aware that this was the most watched crime in history, right?

That's not elaborate. That's just timing. A terrorist attack, even a fake one, would seek to kill the most amount of people, and they did. After people got to work, but before lunchtime. People were actually stopping work throughout the world to stare at their TV screens. 7 went almost entirely unregarded, except for engineers, architects, and CT discussions.
 
Osama Bin Laden and Khalid Sheik Mohammed wanted maximum exposure before their target audience.



This highlights the problem with so much of the CT theory of how the world works- it's essentially indistinguishable from how things would be if the "official story" were true.

The argument that the attacks were timed for "maximum shock and awe" works equally well both for the "THEY did it" theory and the "Terrorists did it" theory. Both groups would want maximum exposure to generate maximum public reaction. So this "point" does absolutely nothing to help us determine who was actually responsible.

And yet, it's exactly these sorts of points that the CTists keep harping on.
 
"Both groups would want maximum exposure to generate maximum public reaction. So this "point" does absolutely nothing to help us determine who was actually responsible."

Indeed, except that 000063 (as he stated above) realizes that real terrorists would go for the maximum carnage.
 
"Both groups would want maximum exposure to generate maximum public reaction. So this "point" does absolutely nothing to help us determine who was actually responsible."

Indeed, except that 000063 (as he stated above) realizes that real terrorists would go for the maximum carnage.

Have you contacted Moussaoui's defense team yet? I'm sure they'd be interested
 
Wouldn't this mark the first time they went for maximum exposure instead of maximum fatalities?
Not the "first time" canard again.

"Both groups would want maximum exposure to generate maximum public reaction. So this "point" does absolutely nothing to help us determine who was actually responsible."

Indeed, except that 000063 (as he stated above) realizes that real terrorists would go for the maximum carnage.
And did, I am asserting.

...
That's not elaborate. That's just timing. A terrorist attack, even a fake one, would seek to kill the most amount of people, and they did. After people got to work, but before lunchtime. People were actually stopping work throughout the world to stare at their TV screens. 7 went almost entirely unregarded, except for engineers, architects, and CT discussions.
My point is that using the amount of spectacle as evidence of a 'spiracy is illogical.
 
Last edited:
"Both groups would want maximum exposure to generate maximum public reaction. So this "point" does absolutely nothing to help us determine who was actually responsible."

Indeed, except that 000063 (as he stated above) realizes that real terrorists would go for the maximum carnage.



Maximum exposure and maximum carnage are not mutually exclusive, but thanks for playing.
 
I love how he tried to creatively misunderstand what I said when I am in the thread and able to correct him. That, or he genuinely misunderstood me, thought I cannot see how a reasonable person could do so.
 
Wouldn't this mark the first time they went for maximum exposure instead of maximum fatalities?

There is no "instead" here. Al-Qeada went for both maximum exposure and maximum fatalities on 9/11 and they unfortunately succeeded.
 

Back
Top Bottom