Merged "Iron-rich spheres" - scienctific explanation?

[Christopher7]

Thanks for saving me the time. Let me know when the revolution starts, ok?

What a joke

I have plenty of data. I'm not going to present it until you agree that what I present constitutes data that disproves the thermite claptrap.

Your demand that I agree to abandon all the other evidence of thermite before showing me your evidence was unrealistic and childish.

Someone else provided the evidence from a solid waste plant but in the interim it occurred to me that iron microspheres created this way would be carried away with the smoke. You're an hour late and a dollar short sweetie.

 

[Christopher7]

The EDS of fly ash that I have does not have aluminum and silicone spikes like the thermite EDS.

http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/5...onspectrum.jpg

Sweetie, the trace-level peaks of aluminum and silicon present in the x-ray spectrum come from the particles next to the iron oxide particle. The overscan of the particle used to produce the x-ray data for the chart also excited x-rays from those particles.

I know because I took the data.

Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[NoahFence]

What a joke

Your demand that I agree to abandon all the other evidence of thermite before showing me your evidence was unrealistic and childish.

Someone else provided the evidence from a solid waste plant but in the interim it occurred to me that iron microspheres created this way would be carried away with the smoke. You're an hour late and a dollar short sweetie.

All of them?

 

[sheeplesnshills]

What a joke

Your demand that I agree to abandon all the other evidence of thermite before showing me your evidence was unrealistic and childish.

Someone else provided the evidence from a solid waste plant but in the interim it occurred to me that iron microspheres created this way would be carried away with the smoke. You're an hour late and a dollar short sweetie.

Really? what makes you so sure of that. What experiments have you conducted with large scale office fires that would confirm that hypothesis?

 

[leftysergeant]

Someone else provided the evidence from a solid waste plant but in the interim it occurred to me that iron microspheres created this way would be carried away with the smoke.

You cannot, however, conclude from that that is would be carried away from the towers.

FAIL

 

[Christopher7]

No, they have fed gullible saps like yourself mushroom food.

A gullible sap is someone who believes the NIST reports.

They have not given us any evidence that what they think happened happened.

You mean speculation, not evidence. We all know that that is just a ploy so you can make snotty remarks.

Incorrect. The RJ Lee report is forensic evidence of melted iron and vaporized lead.

How many times need you be told that that is not evidence of thermite?

It most certainly is. How many times do you have to be reminded that you have no viable alternative to the presence of melted iron and vaporized lead?

In order to vaporize lead, the thermite would have to be in contact with it.

In the chaos of the collapse after the computers had been pulverized.

There was lead all over the towers and there were localized spots of intense flames in places where we know there were massive battery arrays.

Source?

IT CAN'T BE BECAUSE:

Nowhere did we see the intense light or white smoke that MUST accompany a thermite reaction.

 

[NoahFence]

It most certainly is. How many times do you have to be reminded that you have no viable alternative to the presence of melted iron and vaporized lead?

There are several alternatives. They've all been presented in a rational, polite manner, yet you ignore them in favor of the single most impossible theory.

Why?

Source?

Why do you people constantly need a source for common knowledge, and fail to provide your own consistently?

 

[Christopher7]

You cannot, however, conclude from that that is would be carried away from the towers.

Microspheres have very little weight. Particulate matter of many types are carried away with the smoke. Do you really think that iron microspheres would not be carried away with the smoke?

 

[DGM]

Microspheres have very little weight. Particulate matter of many types are carried away with the smoke. Do you really think that iron microspheres would not be carried away with the smoke?

So tell us again why the "thermite" ones weren't?.

 

[Christopher7]

There are several alternatives.

There has been speculation but no viable alternatives.

Source?

Why do you people constantly need a source for common knowledge, and fail to provide your own consistently?

The presence of batteries on the floors where the molten steel/iron came from is NOT common knowledge. In fact, there is no source for that.

 

[Christopher7]

So tell us again why the "thermite" ones weren't?.

They were created during the collapse and caught up in the chaos of the distinction.

 

[DGM]

They were created during the collapse and caught up in the chaos of the distinction.

So all the fires were gone at that point?

 

[sheeplesnshills]

A gullible sap is someone who believes the NIST reports.

Really? What part of it do you have a problem with? Lets just go with what you consider to be their biggest error in fact or calculation.........explain what exactly you consider the error to be and show us your math that proves your point.

 

[Christopher7]

All of them?

The vast majority. As Lefty pointed out, some would adhere to things they came in contact with.

 

[Christopher7]

A gullible sap is someone who believes the NIST reports.

Really? What part of it do you have a problem with? Lets just go with what you consider to be their biggest error in fact or calculation.........explain what exactly you consider the error to be and show us your math that proves your point.

http://truthphalanx.com/chris_sarns/

ETA: If you want to debate these points, start another thread.

 

[000063]

Ah, yes, the avoidance of stating what your strongest evidence is. Standard Truther tactic.

 

[Christopher7]

So all the fires were gone at that point?

Do you see any fires after the beginning of the collapse?

 

[Christopher7]

Ah, yes, the avoidance of stating what your strongest evidence is. Standard Truther tactic.

You did not bother to click on the link. The evidence is there.

 

[000063]

Actually I did. There is no single or even a several pieces of evidence that you consider the strongest. Just a mass of stuff.

Chris,

Have you ever encountered a precision controlled demolition, particularly one that used state-of-the-art incendiaries to remove eight stories of structural steel instantly, in which the building was prepped by allowing fires to burn inside the structure for several hours?

Just asking,

Istvan

 

[DGM]

Do you see any fires after the beginning of the collapse?

Not through all the dust and smoke. Do you see "thermite" burning?