Here we have a example of a pretty powerful explosion, that didnt cause any serious injuries to one of the victims:
http://winnipeg.ctv.ca/servlet/an/l...re_explosion_120103/20120103?hub=WinnipegHome
That incident did not involve high explosives
So much for your "knowledge" of explosives. Try thinking before posting.
Barry Jennings is a very good witness.
Yes. He is a perfect witness for the fact that the damage done to WTC 7 was done by gawdawful amounts of debris falling from the north tower.
There is no other logical reason, as to why the firefighters would run away from the rescue operation, besides what Jennigs said, that the other two towers collapsed, so then the explosions cannot be explained by the towers collapsing.
Total ********. The north tower was already down when the fire fighters found out that Jennings and Hess were inside. We have video.
It would be impossible not to recognise the lobby in WTC 7 a little more then an houre before Jennings was rescured, as we can see in this video below, and the firemen would never have told Jennings that quote: "This was the lobby" and they wouldnt haft to exit the lobby trough a hole in the wall:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bADURTAvtgk
The rescue of Jennings and Hess started after the lobby was chewed all to hell by falling debris. what is your point?
The total destruction of the lobby of WTC 7, the walls, escelators, lobby doors, everything beeing destroyed, is very strong evidence of high energy explosives.
Cow cookies. We saw what did that damage. It was pieces of the north tower.
That the cop wanted him to RUN from the building, very strongly indicates that MORE explosions were expected, the reports the police got and mentioned to Jennings, obviously was reports of the explosions that destroyed the lobby and killed fire and policemen, this is the only logical conclusion that can be drawn.
Horse feathers. Both towers were already down. The cops had no reason to believe that therre were explosive charges set in the buidling. They did, however, know by this point that damaged steel-framed buildings pre-weakened by heavy impacts and set afire can fall down. They had no way of knowing how long it would take, and thus made the wise decison not to wait around to find out.
She thinks you are an idiot. She describes cars cooking off from fires. Then drooling morons like MacQueen take this as a sign that there were bombs every place.
It is just ridiculous trying to explain this with something like Electric Transformer explosions, when she clearly states that the flashes and explosions where going up and down and all around the bulding. If it was only one flash at ONE location i would agree, but this was flashes and explosions on multiple locations all going off at almost the same time.
We have all seen what she saw. She saw fire beging squoze out of the floors thjat were still on fire when the collapse started. You also have to take into account that she could not see even that clearly because her eyes were full of crap from the first collapse.
Was inside the north tower when the south collapsed. Hard to tell the difference between a bomb and a hundred tons of steel hitting the outside of a building you are in.
So we have evidence of:
- The ground shaking before the collapse
Prove it.
-
Windows far away being blown out by the explosions
Not even one that you can prove.
- The lobby of WTC 7 being totally destroyed
Ballistic damage from the collapse of the north tower. We saw it happen.
- Powerful force winds and heavy shaking of floors/building
- People being thrown by explosions at different times
All copnsistant with the displacement of tons of air by tons of falling debris creating a turbidity flow.
- Orange flashes all around the building going up and down on different locations together with explosvie sound
How come, with every TV camera in NYC trained on the buildings, was this not recorded?
- Shockwaves visible to the eye going through the building before the collapse
Not true.
- Multiple explosions right before the collapse
Not true.
- Powerful squibs going trought the steel at the corner of the building (as shown by David Chandler).
Discussed and dismissed elsewhere. Chandler has no clue what he is talking about.
- Ejection speed of the squibs from the towers also matches the speeds recorded for ejections caused by explosives
Not in the least bit similar.
- Squibs and objects are being ejected before the tower begins to collapse
Got evidence?
- Speed of the collapse etc
Half the speed of gravity? WTF?
So yes, it is correct to state that we can see all the characteristics of high energy explosives. It is incorrect to assert otherwise.
If explosives were used, we would expect the evidence to be destroyed and no real inspection being allowed, this was the case on 911.
Get a clue. there were cops and fire fighters screening rubble and finding things like keys and rings. You think they are going to ignore explosives residues? You lack the education to do this sort of thing.
Anyone else, that dont like corrupt officials destroying a legal case in an investigation, will be honest and point out what James Quintiere, Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division, points out: "A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures they predict as necessary for failure are corroborated by findings of the little steel debris they have"...
Meadow muffins. Quintiere is not sure that the standards set by NIST for future construction are stringent enough. He thinks that steel might fail at lower temperatures. Have you noticed that he has never given twoofers the time of day?
Back to Jennings for a moment. When describing the "explosion" that he heard in WTC 7, it is clear that it did not involve HE. He and Hess were "blown back up" some stairs. Hess described it as a wind. Inside the building, it would have been a shock wave, not a wind, if it involved HE.
Jennings further stated that he had heard boilers blow up and that this in no way resembled boiler blowing up. This proves that it was not a bomb of any sort.
Your test results are in.
FAIL
)
The velocities of debris looks wrong too...far to slow.
