Edx
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 5,642
Or when they try to "interpret" expert and eye witness accounts, like EdX on Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl.![]()
Oh I see, you still cant comprehend the point. Good job, ergo. Apparently you still dont understand the fact that you're claiming Astaneh-Asl is an expert and therefore you can use him as an authority, yet at the same exact time you must also claim he is an absolute idiot or at least completly incompetent because he doesnt believe there is anything to your conspiracy claims. Why doesnt Astaneh-Asl think melted steel = thermite? He must be incompetent or in on it. So you require him to be an idiot conspirator that cant keep his mouth shut, or an expert and an incompetent at the same time. Apparently you think this is reasonable.
So far in this thread we've seen three different bedunker assertions of what happened that afternoon, who said what, what decision was made, by whom and why, all of them contradicting the others in some important aspect. Give it up, guys. You can't even get your fakery straight.
Exactly what is contradictory in this thread? You have yet to reply to any of the criticisms of your claims.
Larry has no reason to casually admit fraud and conspiracy with the FDNY to rig WTC7 in a few hours with super secret nano thermite to demolish a building in a way never used before or since without anyone noticing. "Pull" is used by firefighters to describe the firefighting operation or groups of firefighters. The FDNY said the same thing Larry said they did, that they pulled everyone away because it was probably going to collapse. It did. And "Pull it" doesnt mean to put explosives in buildings and blow them up anyway, sorry.
Why do you always require your conspirators to behave like such clueless morons?
Last edited: