Dragon Family lawsuit against the United Nations

[tsig]

The cabal is likely an international shadow society that uses mind control on its own members. Members of the cabal can be found in many different positions in society.

The cabal is using mind control on you right now?

 

[tsig]

Maybe the wrong forum. I'm out of here.

Again?

ETA: I see that didn't last long.

 

[JayUtah]

Again?

ETA: I see that didn't last long.

It never does. A performance artist needs the stage. Threatening to depart it is only part of the act.

 

[Anders Lindman]

When you tell someone that a 4 foot tall Big Mac is living in your garage and teaching interpretive dance to unicorns, do you need to provide evidence for that statement, or do you expect others to prove it false?

The logic is that when someone says something, then that is not the same as it automatically being false. The lack of evidence doesn't automatically make something false.

Many of the members of this forum need some logic lessons it seems.

 

[Anders Lindman]

No, but if the claim is extraordinary, it must be assumed false until proven true. This has been explained to you several times already.

No, it mustn't. That's not logical. It may be rational, or not. Do you see the difference?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Who has the burden of proof and why?

If guests on radio shows always needed to provide evidence, then George Noory's guests on Coast to Coast would have a difficult time.

 

[Anders Lindman]

The cabal is using mind control on you right now?

No, the mind controlled members don't know what they do. I do know what I do.

 

[Mojo]

So when you tell someone you know you had Big Mac for lunch, do you need to provide evidence for that statement? Ha ha.

It is a well evidenced fact that people often eat Big Macs for lunch.

 

[Mojo]

No, the mind controlled members don't know what they do. I do know what I do.

How do you know? Perhaps they are controlling your mind in such a way that you believe that you know what you do.

 

[Anders Lindman]

How do you know? Perhaps they are controlling your mind in such a way that you believe that you know what you do.

The members of the cabal are REALLY mind controlled, meaning they don't have a conscious awareness of what they do. They are like robots. Such as what Svali has described: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI1c3MLDEII

 

[Anders Lindman]

It is a well evidenced fact that people often eat Big Macs for lunch.

And? That doesn't change the logic one iota. Let me repeat: When someone says something without providing evidence, then that's not the same as what is being said is just made up information.

 

[JayUtah]

If guests on radio shows always needed to provide evidence, then George Noory's guests on Coast to Coast would have a difficult time.

Second non-answer noted. You've tried to bluster past my question and you've tried to change the subject. Prove you're not a troll.

Who has the burden of proof and why?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Second non-answer noted. You've tried to bluster past my question and you've tried to change the subject. Prove you're not a troll.

Who has the burden of proof and why?

Burden of proof? A radio interview is not a legal case. lol.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

No, the mind controlled members don't know what they do. I do know what I do.

That's exactly what someone under the influence of mind control would say.

 

[JayUtah]

Burden of proof? A radio interview is not a legal case. lol.

Dodge number three. Who has the burden of proof for such a story and why?

 

[Tomtomkent]

The logic is that when someone says something, then that is not the same as it automatically being false. The lack of evidence doesn't automatically make something false.

Many of the members of this forum need some logic lessons it seems.

Given a lack of evidence, what is there to overcome the null?
(You did learn about the null hypothosis in your logic lessons right?)

 

[Anders Lindman]

That's exactly what someone under the influence of mind control would say.

Ha ha. I am consciously aware, I can assure you. Svali (or someone else who described mind control in a video I watched) said that her mother wasn't aware of being mind controlled, and would even deny it when it was pointed out to her that she was spoken to in German and she didn't know any German in her ordinary personality. Her mother's alter knew the German language, but she was totally unaware of that such alter existed. So when in altered state, the mind controlled members are not consciously aware! Pretty scary stuff.

 

[Tomtomkent]

Burden of proof? A radio interview is not a legal case. lol.

That response is neither rational nor logical.

You have speculated something, presumably because you wish to know if somebody else believes them or not. You have been asked to support the claims with evidence, then argued the burden of proof. It doesn't matter if the statement comes from a radio show, comic or court, you made a statement in a discussion, why should we believe it is true if you do not supply evidence?

You understand the concept of discussions?

 

[Anders Lindman]

Dodge number three. Who has the burden of proof for such a story and why?

Nobody! <-- answer. Imagine George Noory demanding proof ALWAYS for EVERYTHING his guests were talking about.

A radio interview is not a legal court.

 

[Anders Lindman]

That response is neither rational nor logical.

You have speculated something, presumably because you wish to know if somebody else believes them or not. You have been asked to support the claims with evidence, then argued the burden of proof. It doesn't matter if the statement comes from a radio show, comic or court, you made a statement in a discussion, why should we believe it is true if you do not supply evidence?

You understand the concept of discussions?

The truth is that I don't know if David Sale was telling the truth or not in those interviews. Do you know? IF you claim you do, as Craig4 did, then the burden of proof is on YOU.