AlaskaBushPilot
Illuminator
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 4,341
Indeed, the children with names like "Adolph Hitler" noted above were taken away from their parents for reasons other than the names.
Exactly, and I think it was Vortigern99 who pointed out too that the child's wishes are more important than those of the state power groupies that long for any excuse to make pre-emptive laws.
gumboot pointed out that the OP is misleading in the sense that it was a case of the court adjudicating a name-change request on behalf of the child requesting it instead of the legislative branch listing what names are permissible.
In my experience this is a key ignorance amongst state power groupies - the inability to distinguish between legislative, executive, and judicial functions of government. They're huge fans of laws and police power to "fix" problems that are already within the power of the judicial branch to remedy.
One child might very much like the notoriety of a bizarre name, and another not. Kids take on nicknames when they don't like their boring given names, and a lot of these would probably be prohibited pre-emptively by our committee on politically correct names. Once you adopt this power of legislation, you have given the field over to the do-gooders who have a lot more on their minds than protecting kids from parental abuse.
Prohibiting names that introduce technical problems for the state (use of asterisks, underscores, symbols outside the language, etc.) that are not matters of child abuse are another story and do fall within the proper jurisdiction of legislation. But that isn't the nature of the OP.