JayUtah
Penultimate Amazing
What the lawsuit is saying is that the bonds look fake, when in reality being genuine.
And what I'm saying is that this is an impossible condition because bond certificates are negotiable instruments.
What the lawsuit is saying is that the bonds look fake, when in reality being genuine.
And what I'm saying is that this is an impossible condition because bond certificates are negotiable instruments.
Related to the lawsuit is the shady historical dealings with gold. Remember for example when Roosevelt grabbed the gold from the U.S. citizens. That sounds like a pretty drastic and desperate move by the politicians.
"Executive Order 6102 is an Executive Order signed on April 5, 1933, by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the Hoarding of Gold Coin, Gold Bullion, and Gold Certificates within the continental United States". The order criminalized the possession of monetary gold by any individual, partnership, association or corporation." -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102
And in Asia a similar gold grabbing took place:
"Golden lily was the codename given to a project instigated by the Japanese Imperial family. The aim of the project was to rape Asia of its precious metals and mineral resources to feed the industrial revolution back home and the wealth of the Imperial family. ... Nobody knows how much gold and precious metals were in Korea and China at the turn of the 20th century. The accumulated mass of thousands of years of collection and refining in a region of the world which is abundant in natural deposits can neither be guessed at nor confirmed ... for the best part of 40 years the Japanese transferred unhindered, the bullion by ship to the motherland, to be hidden in giant vaults underneath the Imperial palace and underground storage facilitys in the mountains around Tokyo" -- http://joanphils.0catch.com/yamashita_s_treasure__golden_lilly__the_japanese_looting_spree.htm
And remember that I have speculated about how the rulers of the Asian nations were cooperating with each other in secret while pretending publicly to be each other's enemies. In the Second Sino-Japanese War for example, to have the Japanese military to loot all gold they could from the people in China was probably a planned event between the Chinese and Japanese leaders.
What happened the world over from the late 19th century and into the 20th century was a massive gold hoarding by the ruling powers.
See previous post #408. If other such bonds can be presented that indeed are genuine, then that would be an amazing circumstantial evidence.
The claim is that those are special bonds, that can only be used in certain ways.
Not really, you need to substantiate the ones presented, when were they issues,w hat were there numbers and under what authority were they recorded.
There are different types of bonds mentioned in the lawsuit. One type is as old as from the 30s if I remember correctly. Another type is called Kennedy bonds. The same type of bonds would have to be presented for it to give strong support to the claims in the lawsuit.
Why is it so difficult for you to see that presenting any number and type of other bonds does not substantiate the existence of the ones Keenan says he once had?
The claim is that those are special bonds, that can only be used in certain ways.
Because those are very special bonds, not known to the public to even exist!
So if some of those bonds can be presented and shown to be genuine, then that's an amazing story in itself.
The claim is that those are special bonds, that can only be used in certain ways.
Also: David Wilcock said that the Jews had a lot of gold that was robbed. He probably meant during the Holocaust. Horrible stuff.
Because those are very special bonds, not known to the public to even exist! So if some of those bonds can be presented and shown to be genuine, then that's an amazing story in itself. And it will be a strong support for the claims in the lawsuit.
Here is Article 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which deals with negotiable instruments. Please indicate the section or sections that discuss such "special" instruments.
We don't need David Wilcock to tell us that Jews in Europe were the victims of the largest robbery homicide in human history. That sad fact has nothing to do with forged bonds.
Two parties can enter a business agreement outside of that code.
Two parties can enter a business agreement outside of that code.
It was a gold hoarding going on for decades all over the world! And the bonds in the lawsuit are for the exchange of huge amounts of gold. And many more such bonds exist. So it's a debt of hundreds of trillions of dollars.
Here is the part II they talked about in that show where 'anonymous' told David Wilcock to post the additional information, to make the situation safer for David:
And according to Wilcock he will post a part III later on.
Here is the show: