• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
You mean other than Höss, Muthig, Hoellriegl, Krebsbach, Niedemayer, Altfuldisch ...

Shall I continue on down the list, or do you have enough to run from now?
.

Oh, the ones who lost the use of their testicles?
 
Oh, the ones who lost the use of their testicles?
.
No, I mean the ones I mentioned.

Unless you have any of that, you know, evidence thingy that any of these "lost the use of their testicles"?

No?


Because you don't even know who most of them even are?


Rather transparent lie for you to post the suggestion that any of them did.




Why is it perfectly okay for you to post such degenerate , objectively provable lies, and then try to use "I don't believe it" to support your accusations of lying on the parts of others.

Are you *ever* going to get around to showing us a lie on that page from THHP?

How's that computer model thing coming along?
.
 
You hadn't heard?

Newp- despit owning "Postal", I only know Boll by reputation, such as it is; my taste in Bad Directing lies more towards the oeuvres of Phil Tucker or Ed Wood....if there was ever an ideal film to be shown with "The Day The Clown Cried", this would be it
 
Will I?

I don't answer cause why questions whose purpose is misdirection by nonsense.
First, you misrepresent what Rod Serling did and didn't say about the Holocaust. Then, caught, you misrepresent how the Holocaust has been treated in popular movies. Now, having apparently misstated what Nazis said about gas chambers in death camps and having implied, when you were caught, that any statements affirming gas chambers were a result of mistreatment, you make this absurd declaration - that for you to provide evidence of your claims is "misdirection by nonsense."

If you cannot provide evidence of mistreatment, then the only logical responses readers of this thread can have is to conclude you are mistaken - and that your reference to mistreatment was another error on your part. And, finally, that Nazis did affirm the gas chambers, contrary to your earlier claim, just as Rod Serling did mention gas chambers, contrary to your other earlier claim.
 
Last edited:
In addition to the prior mentioned cinematic depictions of gas chambers there was also the TV miniseries "Holocaust" shown first in the late Seventies. There are two scenes of a gas chamber at Auschwitz, one of a gas chamber at Hadamar and one scene involving a gas van. Just checked and it is available on You Tube.
 
First, you misrepresent what Rod Serling did and didn't say about the Holocaust. Then, caught, you misrepresent how the Holocaust has been treated in popular movies. Now, having apparently misstated what Nazis said about gas chambers in death camps and having implied, when you were caught, that any statements affirming gas chambers were a result of mistreatment, you make this absurd declaration - that for you to provide evidence of your claims is "misdirection by nonsense."

If you cannot provide evidence of mistreatment, then the only logical responses readers of this thread can have is to conclude you are mistaken - and that your reference to mistreatment was another error on your part. And, finally, that Nazis did affirm the gas chambers, contrary to your earlier claim, just as Rod Serling did mention gas chambers, contrary to your other earlier claim.

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore View Post
What a coincidence the Nazi's never mentioned them either.

As a group. As a group.
 
I'm going to give you three terms to search online. Please do so:

(1) Frankfurt
(2) 1965
(3) Auschwitz
 
I can always tell by the deafening silence when I'm on the money.
You haven't made a single statement, from what I can see, that is factually accurate here today. You have posted a few remarks that are breathtakingly incomprehensible - such as "I don't answer cause why questions whose purpose is misdirection by nonsense," "As a group. As a group," and "Letting bad Jewish people hide and do their crap neath the skirts of Judaism."

Sometimes, Clayton, deafening silence is really astonishment.

Oh, and you haven't acknowledged or corrected a single one of your misstatements or errors.
 
Nope. Sixteen golden gloves; 2800 lifetime hits.

DUHHHHHHHHH Brooks Robinson wasn't even playing MLB when Al Rosen was the best third baseman in the AL.

So was the great Al Rosen. Nobody made a big deal about it when us kids talked about who was the best 3rd baseman in the American League. I doubt if I even knew, at that time, that Rosen was Jewish.
 
Like other great men of the time, Ike, Charles, and Winston, Rod passed on passing on, for posterity, any mention of the heinous "gas chambers" garbage. Why? Because it was a lie.

That statement shows you have not seen the episode you are trying to sound authoritive about
 
Will I?

I don't answer cause why questions whose purpose is misdirection by nonsense.
.
Care to try again using standard English, properly punctuated?

You made the suggestion -- either support it, or retract it: Which specific witnesses I mentioned experienced problems with their testicles?
.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom