• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Will you ever tire of posting the same speculation over and over again in lieu of the material evidence you were asked for?
 
Robert Prey said:
You're late to the party. There's a mountain of evidence that proves conspiracy, 30 plus medical personnel at Parkland
Click to expand...



Which oddly enough none of them report seeing your entrance wound in his face or forehead. Even though JFK was lying on his back.
 
Robert Prey said:
Only the deaf, dumb and intentionally blind could possibly support the Lone Nutter fairy tale. But there is no shortage of those on this board of Deep Thinkers.
Click to expand...

So the reason you lied about LHO attending military language school and being fluent in Russian is because...? :rolleyes:
 
Robert Prey said:
Bullet Wound to right temple here.
Click to expand...

Robert, your knowledge of wound ballistics is non existent. Entrance wounds SMALL, exit wounds BIG!

May I refer you to a couple of excellent books on the subject. Buy these, study them then come back and admit you were wrong (Yeah like that's going to happen.)

Gunshot wounds: practical aspects of firearms, ballistics, and forensic ...
By Vincent J. M. Di Maio
Click to expand...
Price ~$115

Terminal Ballistics: A Text and Atlas of Gunshot Wounds [Hardcover]
Malcolm J. Dodd
Click to expand...

Price ~$195

These books are probably different from others that you have read in that they are filled with facts. (But I love a good novel also)
 
So Robert, out of interest, instead of drawing a sketch made under instruction from a description of what somebody thought they remembered (and the cropped photo that counters your claim), do you have any material evidence yet?
 
GregHouseMD said:
Robert, your knowledge of wound ballistics is non existent. Entrance wounds SMALL, exit wounds BIG!
Click to expand...

Robert knows all about the appearance of entry and exit wounds. He posted this way back on post #516.

Robert Prey said:
From: Explore Forensics
http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk/entrance-and-exit-wounds.html

Understanding Injuries > Entrance and Exit Wounds
Entrance and Exit Wounds
Author: Jack Claridge - Updated: 20 July 2010 | Comment
Entrance And Exit Wounds Gun Shot Bullet

"...The entrance wound is normally smaller and quite symmetrical in comparison to the exit wound..,."

"Exit wounds...are usually larger than the entrance wound and this is because as the round moves through the body of the victim it slows down and explodes within the tissue and surrounding muscle. This slowing down of the projectile means that as it reaches the end of its trajectory it has to force harder to push through. This equates to the exit wound normally looking larger and considerably more destructive than its pre-cursor - the entrance wound."
Click to expand...

This is why the Zapruder film is such a problem for Robert.

One of the most important aspects of the Zapruder film, often overlooked by the critics, are the frames immediately after the President was shot in the head. It's very clear on the enhanced frames that there is a wound over the right ear, but the back of the head is clean. That film is incontrovertible evidence that there was no defect on the rear of the head.

Dr. Michael Baden, Chairman of the HSCA Forensic Panel (Posner, pp. 309-310)
Click to expand...

In other words, the Zapruder film shows no massive exit wound on the back of Kennedy's head where it must be if Robert's shot from the grassy knoll theory is correct.

fullcmpuu0.jpg


This is why Robert has to lie about the Z film and why he keeps posting that little cartoon drawing of the alleged exit wound on the back of the president's head.
 
GregHouseMD said:
Robert, your knowledge of wound ballistics is non existent. Entrance wounds SMALL, exit wounds BIG!

May I refer you to a couple of excellent books on the subject. Buy these, study them then come back and admit you were wrong (Yeah like that's going to happen.)

Price ~$115



Price ~$195

These books are probably different from others that you have read in that they are filled with facts. (But I love a good novel also)
Click to expand...

Before I run out and buy those books, perhaps you could enlighten me on one fact: Were either Di Maio or Dodd present at Parkland or at the autopsy at Bethesda? Did they actually view the wounds? I don't think so.

Thanks,

RP
 
Were the parkland doctors ballistic experts?
No?

Then on what grounds can we assume the suppossition of direction of bullets accurate?

Is there any material evidence to support their claims of what they think they remember seeing?


No. We cant. And no.

Thanks Robert.
 
For Anyone Who Is Not Robert

HSienzant said:
What part of the first sentence of [the Katzenbach]memo did you not understand?

"It is important for all the facts surrounding President Kennedy's assassnation be made public in a way that will satisfy people in the United States and abroad that all the facts have been told And that a statement to that effect is to be made now."
Click to expand...

For anyone interested in the real history behind the creation of the Warren Commission (as apposed to the lies told by the conspiracy hucksters), here is a rather fascinating web page with actual White House telephone recordings from November 24 and November 25, 1963.

http://www.hpol.org/lbj/warren/

The first recording from November 24, the day Oswald was killed, features LBJ aide Bill Moyers speaking to Eugene Rostow, dean of the Yale Law School. Rostow is usually credited with being the first person to come up with the idea of a special commission to investigate the assassination.

The rest of the recordings are from November 25, the day of JFK's funeral, and feature LBJ talking to J.Edgar Hoover among others. Interestingly, LBJ first thought a Texas commission would be adequate but, probably influenced by Moyers, later came around to the idea of a special presidential commission.

Real history and fascinating stuff and an antidote to the usual conspiracy bunk.
 
Last edited:
Robert Prey said:
Before I run out and buy those books, perhaps you could enlighten me on one fact: Were either Di Maio or Dodd present at Parkland or at the autopsy at Bethesda? Did they actually view the wounds? I don't think so.
Click to expand...

Robert, since you already know what entrance and exit wounds look like (as I demonstrated above) and yet continue to tell your lies about why no exit wound on the back of JFK's head is visible in the Z film, why would you need to buy any books?

You have shown nothing new since that laughable picture of the doofus holding a broomstick. You just keep playing the same flashcards we have all seen over and over again as if to convince yourself that what's on them is true.

You've shot your wad, Robert. You have nothing left to say. Why don't you just pick up your marbles and go home?
 
Last edited:
Walter Ego said:
Robert, since you already know what entrance and exit wounds look like (as I demonstrated above) and yet continue to tell your lies about why no exit wound on the back of JFK's head is visible in the Z film, why would you need to buy any books?

You have shown nothing new since that laughable picture of the doofus holding a broomstick. You just keep playing the same flashcards we have all seen over and over again as if to convince yourself that what's on them is true.

You've shot your wad, Robert. You have nothing left to say. Why don't you just pick up your marbles and go home?
Click to expand...


And why are you so upset after claiming months ago you put me on "ignore"?????
 
Robert Prey said:
Before I run out and buy those books, perhaps you could enlighten me on one fact: Were either Di Maio or Dodd present at Parkland or at the autopsy at Bethesda? Did they actually view the wounds? I don't think so.

Thanks,

RP
Click to expand...

Was the guy who drew the sketch you love to refer to actually at the autopsy or Parkland?

Did he actually view the wounds?

I don't think so.

Thanks for not wishing to improve your knowledge or demonstrate anything close to an open mind.
 
GregHouseMD said:
Was the guy who drew the sketch you love to refer to actually at the autopsy or Parkland?

Did he actually view the wounds?

I don't think so.

Thanks for not wishing to improve your knowledge or demonstrate anything close to an open mind.
Click to expand...

Dr.McCelleland, Yes, at Parkland.




Paul O'Connor
Yes, at Bethesda.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom