• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Explain Atheism to Justinian2

Or he's making stuff up based upon what buttons cause the most reaction when he pushes them.

Considering the inconsistency in his narrative, that is a distinct possibility. Strange that some should desire this sort of reaction , but it seems some people get a kick from getting their ass whopped, again and again.

Hans :rolleyes:
 
Evolution won't wipe out bi-sexuals, but gays are goners.

A gay couple reproduces as well as a couple of mules. Mules aren't extinct though.

Go to the post I'm quoting here, and look at the second line in the post you've quoted, which I have reproduced below for your convenience. For further convenience, I have highlighted the line in question. What does it say?

So, evolution has had millions of years to wipe out homosexuals. Homosexuals are born to heterosexual couples all the time. It is probably easier now, than ever, for homosexuals to have children.

And you predict, Justinian2, that now evolution is going to wipe out homosexuality?

Good luck with that prediction!

(I think the third point is maybe irrelevant but still shows the 'logic' of this position to be even more of a fail)
 
What do atheists do for Christmas?
Eat, drink, be merry, with family.

What are your mores?
What, you mean all of them? :)
I guess my mores arise from a sort of reasoned ethics, based on human commonality, rationality, that suffering is generally bad, and paying it forward is good.
You can reason a lot of mores from a few assumptions like that, such as:

- the golden rule
- don't judge a book by its cover
- bigotry and prejudice are bad
- thou shallt generally not steal/ kill/ commit adultery/ lie
- respect your parents
- etc.

What is your profession?
I'm an engineer.

What is your charity?
I donate to Oxfam and to the "Malteser Hilfsdienst".

How do you vote?
Leftish and Green

Hope that helps.
 
That bar was located in that cloistered town of yours with no gays and no atheists ?

The British prostitute I was most attracted to looked like Rachel Ward (voted one of the ten most beautiful in America). I had frequent company with this prostitute while the movie 'Thorn Birds' (starring Rachel Ward) was playing. I loved her British accent.

Looking back on it, this prostitute was plausibly an Atheist who wrote her own rules. She was into prostitution because working at McDonalds paid minimum wage and enslaved her. She had to make money to support her two children. I was impressed by the fact she wrote her own rules to survive better. I enjoyed helping her and her family by supporting her little business (as she fondly called it).

Unfortunately this probable atheist and British prostitute fell in with drugs and the drug culture and quickly went downhill. Perhaps someone with religious mores would have heeded the danger of drugs and have avoided them.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately this probable atheist and British prostitute fell in with drugs and the drug culture and quickly went downhill. Perhaps someone with religious mores would have heeded the danger of drugs and have avoided them.

No, she just ran out of babies to eat, and reverted to drugs. Happens all the time. Some revert to religion instead, but downhill they all go.

Hans
 
Evolution won't wipe out bi-sexuals, but gays are goners.

A gay couple reproduces as well as a couple of mules. Mules aren't extinct though.

Go to the post I'm quoting here, and look at the second line in the post you've quoted, which I have reproduced below for your convenience. For further convenience, I have highlighted and bolded the line in question. What does it say?

So, evolution has had millions of years to wipe out homosexuals. Homosexuals are born to heterosexual couples all the time. It is probably easier now, than ever, for homosexuals to have children.

And you predict, Justinian2, that now evolution is going to wipe out homosexuality?

Good luck with that prediction!

(I think the third point is maybe irrelevant but still shows the 'logic' of this position to be even more of a fail)
 
Eat, drink, be merry, with family.

What, you mean all of them? :)
I guess my mores arise from a sort of reasoned ethics, based on human commonality, rationality, that suffering is generally bad, and paying it forward is good.
You can reason a lot of mores from a few assumptions like that, such as:

- the golden rule
- don't judge a book by its cover
- bigotry and prejudice are bad
- thou shallt generally not steal/ kill/ commit adultery/ lie
- respect your parents
- etc.

It's interesting that you assimilated the ten commandments.

I'm an engineer.

I donate to Oxfam and to the "Malteser Hilfsdienst".

Leftish and Green

Hope that helps.

Leftish and Green works for me too. I, however, like the type of capitalism that spawns small businesses. I don't like owning stock; I'd rather own a small company.
 
Go to the post I'm quoting here, and look at the second line in the post you've quoted, which I have reproduced below for your convenience. For further convenience, I have highlighted and bolded the line in question. What does it say?

Ignored.
 
Last edited:
I might be atheist...or agnostic....not really sure.

I will say this though. I generally find atheists about the whiniest group of people I have ever encountered. Well that probably not correct. They have about the most annoying vocal minority of any group I have ever encountered. That's more like it.
 
I might be atheist...or agnostic....not really sure.

I will say this though. I generally find atheists about the whiniest group of people I have ever encountered. Well that probably not correct. They have about the most annoying vocal minority of any group I have ever encountered. That's more like it.

Atheists seem proud of their sometimes absolute ignorance of religion.

I like to understand religions and evaluate them for myself. I don't like to have peer pressure cause me to make a black/white decision on any subject or person.

Whether people are religious or nonreligious, I resent them telling me what I should or should not believe. That's why I'm demanding that atheists show religious tolerance. (just kidding about the word demanding) Whether or not people are religious or nonreligious, they should show religious tolerance. Religious tolerance is the law in the USA (enforced in the workplace and schools).
 
Last edited:
The British prostitute I was most attracted to looked like Rachel Ward (voted one of the ten most beautiful in America). I had frequent company with this prostitute while the movie 'Thorn Birds' (starring Rachel Ward) was playing. I loved her British accent.

Looking back on it, this prostitute was plausibly an Atheist who wrote her own rules. She was into prostitution because working at McDonalds paid minimum wage and enslaved her. She had to make money to support her two children. I was impressed by the fact she wrote her own rules to survive better. I enjoyed helping her and her family by supporting her little business (as she fondly called it).

Unfortunately this probable atheist and British prostitute fell in with drugs and the drug culture and quickly went downhill. Perhaps someone with religious mores would have heeded the danger of drugs and have avoided them.

You know the story of the boy who cried wolf ? You're many lies too far to be taken seriously, now.
 
And you never met or heard of atheists or gays in Boston ?
Keep it coming. You're very entertaining.

Does scientology teach you to lie like christianity does ?

I didn't write that. You did. And, as usual, when somebody repeats what I said, it's a lie.
I said that I had never personally met a person that admitted to being an atheist or gay while growing up (0-18 years) in my home town. That home town was NOT Boston (Boston was 25 miles away). I had read about gays and atheists, but they were more of an abstraction to me than a reality.
 
Last edited:
The joke is that homosexual sex isn't going to produce offspring. I know some partners find a heterosexual way to reproduce.

For most of history, having children was considered vitally important. Likely a high percentage of homosexuals wanted children and got them the usual way or 'did their duty' for the family in the usual way and made it with their preferred partners on the side. I don't think it's a coincidence that coming out of the closet coincides with a time when there are much lowered expectations for grandchildren.

I have no idea what the statistics are, but I doubt if the average gay couple has the same number of children as the average heterosexual couple.

Probably not anymore. But if they have straight siblings who have children, most of their genes are going to get passed along anyway. I am not a father, but I have a brother and sister who both had children who are reproducing enthusiastically.
 
I didn't write that. You did. And, as usual, when somebody repeats what I said, it's a lie.
I said that I had never personally met a person that admitted to being an atheist or gay while growing up (0-18 years) in my home town. That home town was NOT Boston (Boston was 25 miles away). I had read about gays and atheists, but they were more of an abstraction to me than a reality.

No, what you actually said was:

I was born and raised in a WASP town. I don't know anything about atheists. I never even knew they existed before recent posts on this site.
<snip>
 
For most of history, having children was considered vitally important. Likely a high percentage of homosexuals wanted children and got them the usual way or 'did their duty' for the family in the usual way and made it with their preferred partners on the side. I don't think it's a coincidence that coming out of the closet coincides with a time when there are much lowered expectations for grandchildren.

Probably not anymore. But if they have straight siblings who have children, most of their genes are going to get passed along anyway. I am not a father, but I have a brother and sister who both had children who are reproducing enthusiastically.

There might be a genetic pro-survival reason why some children in large families - whether they are homosexual or not - choose not to have children of their own. Perhaps, like you say, they see that their genes are being carried on by their brothers and sisters and do not see the need to have children of their own.

I'm aware that evolution has at least a couple of different mechanisms. New theories are that evolution isn't all genetic mutation or natural selection.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom