• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Explain Atheism to Justinian2

Oh, don't worry, we're not mad. Not in either sense of the word. Disappointed, resigned, mildly irritated and bored sums it up so much better.


But we can do something else and **poof** he goes away.

When he does something else, he's still there.

Poor boopsie!
 
And if it is any consolation, Independent Scientology doesn't think that gays are at covert hostility on the tone scale. In fact, one tranvestite gave a large gift to independent Scientology.
 
I was born and raised in a WASP town. I don't know anything about atheists. I never even knew they existed before recent posts on this site.

Did you live in a box ? "Gee, I thought all people were white !" would be just as cloistered.

What do atheists do for Christmas?

Family party.

What is your profession?

Computer programmer. What does atheism have to do with it ?

How do you vote?

With a pencil.
 
By your own words, you're a Nitpicking dilettante

And by your own words, you're a liar.

The belief system of many, but not all, atheists is that theism is bad.

That's not a belief system, but if it were, it'd be grounded in fact.

To me, agnosticism is more valid that atheism. Agnosticism does not make war with the theists as do the nonreligious.

Considering you've claimed to know what atheism is, in addition to being explained several times in this thread, your displayed ignorance of what it means is laughable.

The joke is that homosexual sex isn't going to produce offspring.

And apparently you don't understand evolution, either.

One gay representative

:rolleyes:
 
So, evolution has had millions of years to wipe out homosexuals. Homosexuals are born to heterosexual couples all the time. It is probably easier now, than ever, for homosexuals to have children.

And you predict, Justinian2, that now evolution is going to wipe out homosexuality?

Good luck with that prediction!

(I think the third point is maybe irrelevant but still shows the 'logic' of this position to be even more of a fail)
 
"No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered as patriots. This is one nation under God."
-- George Bush



I didn't vote for him, by the way...
 
Last edited:
So, evolution has had millions of years to wipe out homosexuals. Homosexuals are born to heterosexual couples all the time. It is probably easier now, than ever, for homosexuals to have children.

And you predict, Justinian2, that now evolution is going to wipe out homosexuality?

Good luck with that prediction!

(I think the third point is maybe irrelevant but still shows the 'logic' of this position to be even more of a fail)

Evolution won't wipe out bi-sexuals, but gays are goners.

A gay couple reproduces as well as a couple of mules. Mules aren't extinct though.
 
Last edited:
Evolution won't wipe out bi-sexuals, but gays are goners.

A gay couple reproduces as well as a couple of mules. Mules aren't extinct though.

Go to the post I'm quoting here, and look at the second line in the post you've quoted. What does it say?
 
Go to the post I'm quoting here, and look at the second line in the post you've quoted. What does it say?

With some of these heterosexual people/idiots having twenty children, the world needs more gay couples. Gay is good for the rest of us. Overpopulation's a killer.
 
With some of these heterosexual people/idiots having twenty children, the world needs more gay couples. Gay is good for the rest of us. Overpopulation's a killer.

No, I can see that it does not say that. Try again.
 
And if you believe in reincarnation, there will always be gay people.

Mules aren't extinct, but they rely on three other species to keep going. Mules require donkeys, horses and people.

Homosexuals require heterosexuals.
 
Last edited:
Homosexuals require heterosexuals.

To simply produce offspring (of any sexual "preference"), gay couples need a healthy ovum, viable sperm, and the use of a uterus for about 40 weeks. Nowhere in that combination does it require any of the donors of such things to be heterosexual.
 
Last edited:
Also, we don't have 'representatives' - we aren't that organized.

Thank you for explaining that! The only kind of representative I could think of was a Congressional representative, and I wondered why that wasn't some sort of political scandal: "Congressman sexually harrasses voter." I get it now. In Justinian2's world, gays must have representatives to recruit and further their agenda. Wow. Different world.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom