jargon buster
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,773
second thoughts, Im on thin ice as it is.
Last edited:
I wonder how his interview went this afternoon?
Actually if he just recites his 'stump' stuff to someone who doesn't question it - he might do well. If however she has done some homework and questions him - it might get dicey. We shall see
FreemanMenard said:No, it's due to your claim that you are not bound by the law.
Can you show me that claim?
No? thought not.
But thanks for your support!
As inadvertent and unintentional as it was.
Actually if he just recites his 'stump' stuff to someone who doesn't question it - he might do well. If however she has done some homework and questions him - it might get dicey. We shall see
If there's any truth to his claims about this interview,
(Emphasis mine)That is why I will be on The National very shortly.
All I can confirm is Lysanne Louter became aware of him posting her e-mail here and on the WFS websiteIf there's any truth to his claims about this interview, he's not going to come off looking well.
All I can confirm is Lysanne Louter became aware of him posting her e-mail here and on the WFS website![]()
All I can confirm is Lysanne Louter became aware of him posting her e-mail here and on the WFS website![]()
Yes it certainly was.So it was an email from her?
. A real conman wouldn't be so deluded as to think The National would be friendly to him.
I wonder how the small claim against the officer mentioned in that letter went?
Perhaps we should have a little wager or maybe do a Poll! ?
a/ It was all lies anyway, there was never a genuine chance of an interview.
So, Clown it is, then.
Agreed, all they need to do is ask Menard the right questions and he will do all the debunking on his own.Well, I agree with Jlord it's less likely that there will be a step by step debunking of FOTL if the focus of the story is on the Freemen themselves.