Nuclear (i.e. fission and fusion) mythologies and politics

Anders Lindman said:
First I need a video or image of an atom bomb explosion I think look convincing enough for me to bother even attempting that.
Click to expand...

You need to show the temperature of the explosion at the center if the blast. You need to show the rate at which the temperature drops as distance from ground zero increases.

You will also need to show how quickly the water droplets in the cloud will cool after the event has ended.

All of this requires math.

Get to work.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
You need to show the temperature of the explosion at the center if the blast. You need to show the rate at which the temperature drops as distance from ground zero increases.

You will also need to show how quickly the water droplets in the cloud will cool after the event has ended.

All of this requires math.

Get to work.
Click to expand...

Ha! Do you think I fall for that trap? After having presented flawless math you will just ask me to prove that all the supposed victims of the atom bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima are false. Nice try. Next question.
 
"Mathematics is the language in which God wrote the Universe."
- Galileo Galilei

Mathematics is the foundation of all science, especially physics. If you won't provide scientific evidence then your claims are automatically null and void.
 
Last edited:
Sword_Of_Truth said:
"Mathematics is the language in which God wrote the Universe."
- Galileo Galilei

Mathematics is the foundation of all science, especially physics. If you won't provide scientific evidence then your claims are automatically null and void.
Click to expand...

And mathematics is especially poor for proving atom bomb victims. Because even if the mathematics for the radiation is correct, how do we know that the victims are real in the first place? Maybe they were fake victims, just as in the 9/11 attacks.
 
One funny thing after having looked at the nuclear hoax theory is that news on CNN starts to sound like silly stories for children not to be taken seriously. Recently the Russian President Medvedev has threatened to abandon existing nuclear treaties with the West. Ha ha.
 
Rerevisionist said:
I hadn't realised there'd been some extra posts. However, the moderators here as so incompetent I just can't continue. I'm not as keen to waste time as most posters here!
Click to expand...

Weighed, measured, and found wanting.

If one wants to play in JREF, one needs to bring evidence. Sulking is not part of the scientific method...
 
Steven Greer said that you cannot prove a negative. I don't know if he is correct or not but if he is then it's futile to try to prove that nuclear weapons do NOT exist. So instead we should start ridiculing serious mentioning of nuclear weapons in the news etc. That ridicule will bring down the whole house of smoke and mirrors. Forget about proofs for negative statements. You can't prove a negative so don't try to.
 
For those of you who agree that nuclear weapons may be a hoax, spread the message to other people. We need to mature as a civilization and get rid of the nuclear charade. When people ask for proof tell them that no proof is needed. And if they still demand proof ask them how they are sure that nuclear weapons ARE real.
 
If you are afraid of being ridiculed or that people will think that you have gone mad, then as an alternative direct people to other sources such as this thread to educate them. Truth needs no proof. And with that realization all attempts of debunking pancake.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
Yours is the language of a tyrant. "Don't ask questions, just do as I say!"

With a million followers and a charismatic leader, you might actually be dangerous. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

No. It's not about obedience. It's about critical thinking. Truth needs no proof.
 
Anders Lindman said:
And mathematics is especially poor for proving atom bomb victims. Because even if the mathematics for the radiation is correct, how do we know that the victims are real in the first place? Maybe they were fake victims, just as in the 9/11 attacks.
Click to expand...




:confused: Why am I not surprised.
 
You ARE trolling. You know, it. I know it. Your average amoeba knows it. And as to logic, if it actually worked on you, you'd stop trolling.
 
Funny how people start accusing each other of being a troll when they have lost an argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom