Nuclear (i.e. fission and fusion) mythologies and politics

nomuse said:
What the frack?

You are comparing two strips of film and attempting to judge the luminosity of a peak event?

Next you'll measure the relative stopping power of 45 ACP vs. 9mm parabellum by shooting at a sheet of paper...
Click to expand...

If they had used tons of magnesium like in other fake atom bomb explosions, then the light would have been too bright perhaps to make such double exposure. So they had to skip the magnesium for that atoll explosion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSr39UwpELo
 
Your contributions to nuclear science are quite fascinating, anders. What Nobel will you be working on next?
 
ApolloGnomon said:
Your contributions to nuclear science are quite fascinating, anders. What Nobel will you be working on next?
Click to expand...

Depends on what I come across. I don't actively seek to research conspiracy theories so much and instead get new information mostly from the Internet. One interesting area is to find out how much advanced technology is hidden from the public and even extraterrestrial technology. I'm a great fan of Ray Kurzweil although I don't like the idea of uploading consciousness into computers which sounds like some scary Matrix scenario.
 
Your point about withholding advanced technology is right on target Anders....

Anders Lindman said:
Depends on what I come across. I don't actively seek to research conspiracy theories so much and instead get new information mostly from the Internet. One interesting area is to find out how much advanced technology is hidden from the public and even extraterrestrial technology. I'm a great fan of Ray Kurzweil although I don't like the idea of uploading consciousness into computers which sounds like some scary Matrix scenario.
Click to expand...

Your point about withholding advanced technology is right on target Anders....

Imagine all the stuff the jokers know, have, paid for with our money too....

Jive jive jive it is.....

Rock on Anders, you are indeed the best, the Coltrane of CT.....
 
Anders, we need not concern ourselves with discussing the existence of nuclear weapons. The exist and your suspicions have no influence on anyone who might be in a position to advance your cause, whatever that might be.

Your understanding a nuclear physics is clearly substandard. Would it not be a better plan to ask someone whose knowledge is superior to your own (finding that person should present no great challenge) and ask them to make good your deficiency?
 
Craig4 said:
You are incorrect. The firebombing of other cities took fleets of aircraft. No one saw anymore than two aircraft that morning. Firebombing also does not cause the radiation sickness that Japanese doctors diagnosed. Try again.
Click to expand...

"The papers in Japan reported that Hiroshima was firebombed by several aircraft on the day the so-called atom bomb went off."

"Because the atom bomb was a lie and those cities reduced to ash by M-69 firebombs and that also explains the mysterious vanishing of the historical seismograms of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Are they hiding the fact that there was no shock wave? Is that why the trees were still standing charred and many building facades still standing?"

From: http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...sus-the-atom-bomb-denier/+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk
 
Craig4 said:
Anders, we need not concern ourselves with discussing the existence of nuclear weapons. The exist and your suspicions have no influence on anyone who might be in a position to advance your cause, whatever that might be.

Your understanding a nuclear physics is clearly substandard. Would it not be a better plan to ask someone whose knowledge is superior to your own (finding that person should present no great challenge) and ask them to make good your deficiency?
Click to expand...

The experts would either be a part of the conspiracy or one of the substandard professors in public academia who frankly cannot handle the truth.
 
Anders Lindman said:
They are just parrots swallowing the Einstein relativity hoax hook, line and sinker.
Click to expand...

And again all you do is reveal the appalling shallowness of your knowledge. Tell me Anders is it simply that when you encounter a piece of science that you can't comprehend you simply blame the science and call it a hoax rather than face an unpalabtable truth about your own abilities?
 
Garrison said:
And again all you do is reveal the appalling shallowness of your knowledge. Tell me Anders is it simply that when you encounter a piece of science that you can't comprehend you simply blame the science and call it a hoax rather than face an unpalabtable truth about your own abilities?
Click to expand...

Public academia is very much controlled. Those who can think are taken to real research projects and those who remain in the public education system just imitate what they have been told to believe in. I think all people are basically equally intelligent, but we as humans can be conditioned and programmed like robots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom