• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JFK Conspiracy Theories: It Never Ends

Status
Not open for further replies.
Their statements do not match material evidence. How are you expecting us to comment further? We cant read their minds, we are not making accusations or passing judgement. We are pointing out the statements are not supported by the material evidence. It doesnt matter if they lied. It doesnt matter if they were mistaken. It simply matters that material evidence invalidates the claims and you fail to address why this is so.?

So your best guess is????, they are mistaken? Or lying? It's a simple question and does not require a PhD in Logic.
 
So were the Parkland witnesses all lying, or were they simply mistaken???

(Crickets still chirping)

Either. Neither. We dont know. It doesn't matter. If you cant explain why the photographic evidence doesn't support the statements, then they are simply invalidated.

Why is there no exit wound in any photographic source? Including the uncropped version of your death stare?

I have no idea what would be proven by pretending to be psychic and answering a leading. Question of no importance, regardless of how often you repeat it.
 
So your best guess is????, they are mistaken? Or lying? It's a simple question and does not require a PhD in Logic.

No. It requires psychic powers. And is meaningless. Either way there was still no exit wound to the back of the head in the plaza. And still none when the autopsy photos are taken. Why not?
 
What a sheltered life you must have lived. Ever hear of a Double Agent????

Hoover had. He was also paranoid and proved himself extreme in his views. Oswalds politics would not have been tolerated.

Why is there no sign of an exit wound to the back of JFKs head in the polaroid, the z film or death stare photo (uncropped of course)?
 
No. Only extreme Lefty governments. Certainly were not on the side of Mr. Reagan.

Apparently nobody has informed News International and the rest of the Murdoch empirre. Perhaps Robert can tell us which publications or broadcasters are liberal?
 
Apparently nobody has informed News International and the rest of the Murdoch empirre. Perhaps Robert can tell us which publications or broadcasters are liberal?

Referring to mainstream media, of course: CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, NYT, Wash.Post, Time Mag, Newsweek, Etc., ETc.,ETc.
 
Hoover had. He was also paranoid and proved himself extreme in his views. Oswalds politics would not have been tolerated.)?

No? What other politics could a double agent have during the Cold War, other than strongly pro-Communist? Do you think a flag waving patriotic conservative would even be considered for the role of a Double Agent unless it was all fake??????
 
No. It requires psychic powers. And is meaningless. Either way there was still no exit wound to the back of the head in the plaza. And still none when the autopsy photos are taken. Why not?

Perhaps because your perceptions are limited to a very blurry film, and one subject to alteration, while the contemporaneous views of the first hand witnesses at Parkland are not blurry, nor ambiguous, nor subject to alteration. Nor does it required psychic powers to concloude

A. They all were lying

B.They all were mistaken

C. They were telling truth.

Do you still take the 5th on such an elementary question? What do you have to fear????
 
Why do you keep going on about this irrelevant question? It doesn't matter. Their observations don't match the evidence. You want an answer? Fine. They were either mistaken or lying. There. Can we move on from this now?
 
There is no dispute that someone had a rifle and was shooting from the TSBD. A number of witnesses attesting to that hardly is an ID of the shooter. Obviously.

Other than the fact that Oswald worked there, came to work with a long package that day and then fled the scene there's no reason at all to suspect him of anything.:rolleyes:
 
So does that mean the Parkland witnesses were all lying, or simply mistaken???

(Crickets still chirping)

Answer the questions, Robert.

Are all physicists lying, or simply mistaken?
Why is there a large exit wound in the right front of Kennedy's head in the Zapruder film indicating a shot from the rear?
Which Parkland witnesses do you think are either lying or simply mistaken?

Answer the questions, Robert.

(faint sound of gunshot wound to Robert's feet. Again)
 
Oswald claimed to be a Marxist, but actually was a loyal patriotic American who loved his country, loved his president, was a former US Marine, worked for Naval Intelligence, as well as an operative for CIA and FBI, was sent to USSR after having been sheep dipped as a disloyal American, but never revoked his citizenship, was apparently sent to language school so that he could speak fluent Russian, then sent to USSR so that he could spy for the US. While he made a big splash with the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, he was also working with anti-Castro groups at the same time. Someday, when the full truth is accepted, he should be posthumously awarded the Medal of Freedom.

Didn't know they gave 'patsy's' medals.
 
Hoover had. He was also paranoid and proved himself extreme in his views. Oswalds politics would not have been tolerated.

No? What other politics could a double agent have during the Cold War, other than strongly pro-Communist? Do you think a flag waving patriotic conservative would even be considered for the role of a Double Agent unless it was all fake??????

Yes, Robert, I know. There was even a film about someone who was a Communist for the FBI.

But this is more fundamental than Politics. It's about Power and the real enemy who had what Hoover wanted.

Hoover's paranoia would never have allowed him to employ someone who might be under the influence of James Jesus Angleton.
 
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. And you can lead a Lone Nutter to the truth, but you can't make him take his head out of the sand. You are still hopelessly filled with the brainwash presented by the government and their assets in the media. Hopeless.

But you can drown that ornery cayuse.
 
So does that mean the Parkland witnesses were all lying, or simply mistaken???

(Crickets still chirping)

Of course they were lying, everybody lies all the time about everything, in fact, this post is a lie, now would I lie about a thing like that?
 
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. And you can lead a Lone Nutter to the truth, but you can't make him take his head out of the sand. You are still hopelessly filled with the brainwash presented by the government and their assets in the media. Hopeless.

Translation: I can't or don't want to address anything you've said nor can I prove anything I've said about Lee Harvey Oswald so I'm hand-waving you away.

Can't you even stand by your man, Robert?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom