Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

The fact that media reptiles called an orb a 767 on 911 is beyond refute.


Yeah, just how stupid do they think we are? Those buildings in the orb video don't even look real! They're all blurry, fuzzy and blocky looking! Clearly a fake! Note to Government employed CGI artists: Up your polygon counts and work on your texture mapping. You aren't fooling anyone!
 
You cannot show video of a real 767 on 911 because there was none in the area. You never showed any footage because it's all ******** fakery of computer generated images with different shapes and sizes, some with wings and some without. Why are you having such a hard time with this? You will continue to do nothing which is all that's expected from quacks who cannot prove lies perped by the government and media.

I'm not the one getting confused and posting the wrong video here. Don't get all snippy with me over the fact you don't organize your files on your computer very well. I even suggested a labeling system to help you out.
 
Yeah, I started typing something and then just figured it wasn't worth my typing. It's like someone just drove by and threw a beer can in the yard and by the time you run out to argue with them they are gone, and the argument wouldn't have done any good anyway because they just wanted to get a rise out of you in the first place.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7718097&postcount=1019

His situation is... er... I'll just say special compared even with his conspiracy nut equivalents
 
The fact that media reptiles called an orb a 767 on 911 is beyond refute. They gave it credibility by acknowledging that it was responsible for T2's explosion. It needed to be ignored and written off as a chopper or artifact but wasn't, because humans are incapable of covering almost anything up.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/very-close-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/wtcunitedleftwing.jpg[/qimg]

What "orb" - all I can see is a very poor resolution video of an airliner fast losing altitude.:confused:
 
C'mon, he's just joking right? Like some kind of long form Andy Kaufman style bit?
 
It's so hard to tell. So much of what I see on this forum from truthers looks like some kind of weird performance art.

No he's dead serious... correction obsessively serious. You do not post on 20 something odd forums, spamming pages upon pages upon pages of repeated lunacy and not be serious. Having seen his JFK rantings, and his no-planer rantings, it makes the controlled demolition nuts look like geniuses in comparison.
 
No plane showed up in 4 live broadcasts. The chopper 4 lady and the people in the studio failed to see the orb, and when it was pointed out they called it the plane which of course it was not. Lucky for you, you'll never be tasked with proving a negative, that a twin engine jet could show up as a small circular object moving at 40-50 mph.

[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/real-low-plane_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/very-close-orb_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]
[qimg]http://i889.photobucket.com/albums/ac98/77forever/Gifs/jack_h_GIFSoupcom.gif[/qimg]

A plane landing feet in front of a person in Costa Rica (I think) has what to do with 9/11?? And Jack? Really?

You're not even a talented troll. People like you should be banned simply for stealing bandwidth that could be used for noble purposes.
 
Ah... I knew it was a nice tropical locale or something. I remember watching a TV show about the most extreme airports, and well, it's pretty clear that place made the list!
 
A plane landing feet in front of a person in Costa Rica (I think) has what to do with 9/11?? And Jack? Really?

You're not even a talented troll. People like you should be banned simply for stealing bandwidth that could be used for noble purposes.

A blob plopping into T1 just south of these men reacted to something but certainly not a twin engine jet. That's what you'd have to work with but will never try and prove it could be a 767. That's the dilemma that you'll never face in the real world. It was a small object that dived at the last second and was not a 767.





You're not even a talented troll. People like you should be banned simply for stealing bandwidth that could be used for noble purposes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No he's dead serious... correction obsessively serious. You do not post on 20 something odd forums, spamming pages upon pages upon pages of repeated lunacy and not be serious. Having seen his JFK rantings, and his no-planer rantings, it makes the controlled demolition nuts look like geniuses in comparison.

No I am dead serious... correction obsessively serious. You do not post on 20 something odd forums, spamming pages upon pages upon pages of repeated facts and not be serious. Having seen the easy facts about jfk without any challenge in two years, it's no surprise that 911 is no different.
 
No I am dead serious... correction obsessively serious. You do not post on 20 something odd forums, spamming pages upon pages upon pages of repeated facts and not be serious. Having seen the easy facts about jfk without any challenge in two years, it's no surprise that 911 is no different.

Hey, punk! Stop throwing beer cans in the yard! Get back here and argue like a man!
 
A plane landing feet in front of a person in Costa Rica (I think) has what to do with 9/11?? And Jack? Really?

You're not even a talented troll. People like you should be banned simply for stealing bandwidth that could be used for noble purposes.

A small, circular ufo cannot morph into a poor computer generated image in one minute without real time alteration. That happened on WB11 after 23 minutes of showing the orb and referring to it as a twin engine jet.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIyGEDvG9KQ&list=PL1C1F97A9B8B8D8AE&index=34
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do you continue to post pictures of a plane crashing into the WTC as evidence that a plane didn't crash into the WTC?

What did the people who witnessed it with their own eyes see?

ETA - While you're at it, would you like to explain what a much larger plane filmed from a few feet away landing at a relatively slow speed has to do with a much smaller plane speeding into a building filmed from a few thousand feet away?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom