I bet they may ignore it in the motivation report, just like Massei did. They may ignore it if it was missing in the first defense computer report, because the second report was not admitted.
Did you ever post a link or evidence that they specifically denied the appeal addendum with the screensaver and keyboard light data?
Oh no, I didn’t post an “evidence”. I myself don’t need evidence for things that I know
What matters is when she had her first bite, thus for that testimony it would be 6:00 PM that mattered. There was nothing in her duodenum, that's the first stop after the stomach, thus the moment she swallows, the clock starts on that first bite, …
This is the theory, the doctrine to which all innocentisti cling: only the first bite, the rest doesn’t matter. Sorry if I flatly reject the doctrine. This theory is simply unsupported in scientific literature. This is a standard belief but not ascertained at all in the way you formulate it. There is not a proof that the subsequent assumption of food at close timings does not interfere in any way with the starting of counting. If you have literature that deal with this experimental evidence that would be an interesting reading. But there isn’t any: simply, the stomach isn’t a clock. The start of counting from the first bite is a praxis, based on some standard assumptions. But it is not something really binding to the functioning of the stomach. Just as many organs, the organs of the digestive system can be “used” in varying individualized styles. You should not decide yourself which equation has to be considered true as a mathematic result, without the backing of any real experimental research.
The time of death is uncertain. LJ’s charts report the results of experiments under a number of controlled conditions on a limited scope. Literature reports about mistakes of 12 hours based on this assumptions on stomach emptying time criterion. The assertion that the death should be around 21:00 is unsupported, unproven. Whatever anyone poster or judge believes about it, this will not work as a demonstration.
All of which showed evidence of Rudy Guede in the murder room! Imagine that!
Also showed evidence of multiple assailants, DNA of Sollecito on the bra clasp, Sollecito’s footprint in blood in the bathroom, mixed DNA traces of blood in the bathroom and other rooms, Amanda’s blood in the bathroom, no possible logical scenario to explain the isolated blood footprint attributing it to Rudy, no trace of Rudy in the bathroom nor in FIlomena’s room, and so on.
However it's too late, Toto is in jail, with all things considered he's probably a contender for the least credible witness in the history of man.
Curatolo is not in jail! He is free and he is ok.
Then do one for 11:00 PM. Incidentally, there were no disco buses on the 1st, you did that before, conflating Halloween and All Saint's Day like they didn't matter. Where is any evidence there were disco buses on the 1st?
There were testimonies saying there were disco buses running on that day. Other disco owners and other witnesses working at the service did testify there were disco buses. But his is not the point we have to demonstrate.
He was claiming to have been there when the murder happened, if he wanted anyone to believe his story he couldn't be lying about details that could possibly conflict with other evidence, like if the police had properly weighed the body and took the temperature, if anyone had heard a scream and noted the time exactly, or anyone had seen him leave. There's no reason to put himself there at the wrong time, especially when he was telling the story.
In fact, it’s exactly as you say: there is no reason for him to lie about the timing.
But he could be wrong, because he has not many points of reference, especially as he infers about the time when they probably left.
